1 / 11

Understanding MFI? More mapping requirements

Understanding MFI? More mapping requirements. Commentary. This presentation was prepared to inform discussion at the 2008 WG2 Meeting in Sydney. The purpose was to set out additional requirements that the mapping module needs to address.

lea
Download Presentation

Understanding MFI? More mapping requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Understanding MFI?More mapping requirements

  2. Commentary • This presentation was prepared to inform discussion at the 2008 WG2 Meeting in Sydney. The purpose was to set out additional requirements that the mapping module needs to address. • These are the models that the editor of 19763-4 referenced in his presentation on 25 June 2009 during the 2009 WG2 Meeting in Jeju. KFG - 26 June 2009

  3. Three more ‘Level 1’ data models (b) (a) All same universe of discourse but different levels of abstraction (c) Note:(a) Is a ‘bad’ model but is typical of the sort of model developed by new modellers

  4. Mapping (a) to (b) (a) (b) For this MODEL COMPONENT SET of MODEL INSTANCE (a): • Each instance of DEPOT maps to an instance of SUPPLY UNIT in (b) • Each instance of SUB-DEPOT maps to an instance of SUPPLY UNIT in (b) • Each instance of the relationship from DEPOT to SUB-DEPOT maps to an instance of the relationship from SUPPLY UNIT to UNIT in (b)

  5. Mapping (a) to (b) (a) (b) For this MODEL COMPONENT SET of MODEL INSTANCE (a): • Each instance of SUB-DEPOT maps to an instance of SUPPLY UNIT in (b) • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to an instance of SUPPLY UNIT in (b) • Each instance of the relationship from SUB-DEPOT to SUPPLY UNIT maps to an instance of the relationship from SUPPLY UNIT to UNIT in (b)

  6. Mapping (a) to (b) (a) (b) For this MODEL COMPONENT SET of MODEL INSTANCE (a): • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to an instance of SUPPLY UNIT in (b) • Each instance of UNIT maps to an instance of UNIT in (b) • Each instance of the relationship from SUPPLY UNIT to UNIT maps to an instance of the relationship from SUPPLY UNIT to UNIT in (b)

  7. Mapping (b) to (c) (b) (c) For the MODEL INSTANCE (b): • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT that is described by an instance of UNIT TYPE that is designated as a “Supply Unit” • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT that is described by an instance of UNIT TYPE that has any designation • Each instance of the relationship from SUPPLY UNIT to UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT UNIT ASSOCIATION and its associated relationships to the two UNIT instances

  8. Mapping (a) to (c) (a) (c) For this MODEL COMPONENT SET of MODEL INSTANCE (a): • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT that is described by an instance of UNIT TYPE that is designated as a “Supply Unit – Depot” • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT that is described by an instance of UNIT TYPE that is designated as a “Supply Unit – Sub-Depot” • Each instance of the relationship from SUPPLY UNIT to UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT UNIT ASSOCIATION and its associated relationships to the two UNIT instances

  9. Mapping (a) to (c) (a) (c) For this MODEL COMPONENT SET of MODEL INSTANCE (a): • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT that is described by an instance of UNIT TYPE that is designated as a “Supply Unit – Sub-Depot” • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT that is described by an instance of UNIT TYPE that is designated as a “Supply Unit – Supply Unit” • Each instance of the relationship from SUPPLY UNIT to UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT UNIT ASSOCIATION and its associated relationships to the two UNIT instances

  10. Mapping (a) to (c) (a) (c) For this MODEL COMPONENT SET of MODEL INSTANCE (a): • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT that is described by an instance of UNIT TYPE that is designated as a “Supply Unit – Supply Unit” • Each instance of SUPPLY UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT that is described by an instance of UNIT TYPE that has any designation • Each instance of the relationship from SUPPLY UNIT to UNIT maps to a MODEL COMPONENT SET in (b) that consists of an instance of UNIT UNIT ASSOCIATION and its associated relationships to the two UNIT instances

More Related