480 likes | 814 Views
Hedge with an Edge. Mathematics of Finance. April 7 th and 14 th 2012 Riaz Ahmed & Adnan Khan Lahore University of Management Sciences. The Good.
E N D
Hedge with an Edge Mathematics of Finance April 7th and 14th 2012 Riaz Ahmed & Adnan Khan Lahore University of Management Sciences
The Good • To blame organizational failures solely on derivatives is to miss the point. A better answer lies in greater reliance on market forces to control derivative-related risk taking. 10 Myths About Financial Derivatives by Thomas F. Siems (CATO Institute)
The Bad • “……and it was all caused by derivatives. So, everybody said we better regulate derivatives better, we oughta have more sunshine, we oughta have more transparency..” JOSEPH STIGLITZ Interview with ABC
And the Ugly…… • What are derivatives? • How does one determine the price of such instruments? • The Math behind it all…………..
From Random Walks to Brownian Motion • Consider a random walk • Move right or left based on a coin toss
Random Walk • Define • The mean of Ri • The Variance of Ri
Coin Tossing Game • Heads - wins you a rupee • Tails - loses you a rupee • After n tosses the earnings are given by the rv • Starting with no money, expected earnings after n tosses
Coin Tossing Game • The variance of the earnings is given by • So we have
Making it more Interesting • Consider the quadratic variation • Let’s start flipping the coin faster say n tosses in time t • Q: What should the winnings be so that the quadratic variation is finite and non zero?
In terms of the random walk • If we take n steps in time t, how long should each step be so that the variation remains finite and non zero?
The right scaling • Let the winnings (or alternately the step size) be • i.e. • The quadratic variation then is
Brownian Motion • Consider the random walk, with step size taken every time interval • In the limit as this scaling keeps the random walk finite and non zero
Brownian Motion • The expectation is given by • The variance is as • The limiting process is called Brownian Motion Bt or Weiner Process Wt
Diffusion Equation-who ordered that? • Consider a random walk • Suppose at time t one is at position x • Consider the probability distribution at the next time step
Who ordered that…... • Taylor expanding etc… • Taking vanishingly small time steps and noting we scaled so that remained finite
Variations…… • Consider a function • Want to know how much the function changes over an interval , where • Summing over all intervals we define the n variation as • n=1 (absolute) and n=2 (quadratic) variation
Functions….Nice and otherwise • Nice functions are those with total variation finite • Can define the integral over an interval for such functions (our old friend the Riemann Steiltjes Integral) • Bad functions may not have finite total variation, e.g. on
Weiner Process • A continuous time continuous space stochastic process • Sample paths are continuous • Increments are Normally distributed • i.e. has pdf given by
Weiner Process • Increments are independent are i.id • The covariance is given by • In general
Martingales • A sequence of random variables (stochastic process) where the expectation of the next value is equal to the present observed value • This means knowledge of past events cannot help predict the future • E.g. Ones position in a random walk • E.g. Earnings in the coin tossing game
Technical Mumbo Jumbo • A stochastic process is a P-Martingale with respect to a filtration if • is an information set for the process
Wiener Process • Wiener Process is a Martingale • Increments are mean zero normal and since we are taking expectations at time t, the process is determined up to time t • Hence
Weiner Process is Markovian • A stochastic process satisfies the Markov property if • i.e. The process is memoryless • The future depends on what is now irrespective of the past
Mean Square Convergence • Consider the function F(X). If then it is said that F(X)converges to in the mean square sense • For a Weiner process • This ‘means’ that in the mean square sense
Simulating Weiner Processes • Consider the discretization • where and • Also each increment is given by
Numerical Expectation and Variance • Theoretically on the interval [0,t]
Taylor Series Ito’s Lemma • For a deterministic variable X • However if we try the same for Brownian motion, the higher order terms cannot be dropped as (at least the expected value in the MSS). • Actually as
Ito’s Lemma • For a stochastic variable X • Q: If , what is • A: Using Ito’s lemma • This is an example of an Ito Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE)
Ito’s Lemma • Consider a function of a Weiner Process • Using Taylor’s rule • So we have • Ito SDE
Examples • Q: Obtain an SDE for • A: We have • Using Ito we get • Q: Obtain an SDE for • A: Using Ito we have
Stochastic Integration • Consider Ito’s lemma • Integrating from 0 to t we have
Example • Q : Evaluate • A: Noting • And using the formula derived
Example • Q: Evaluate • A: Note that • The using the formula derived we have
Ito Stochastic Integral • Let f(x(t),t) be a function of the Stochastic Process X(t) • The Ito Stochastic Integral is defined if • The integral is defined as • where the limit is in the sense that given means
Properties of Ito Stochastic Integral • Linearity • Zero Mean • Ito Isometry
Diffusion Processes • Consider the SDE • Here A(G(t),t) is called the drift • And B(G(t),t) is called the diffusion • Q: Given A and B can we determine G? i.e. solve the SDE
‘Solving’ SDE • We derived SDE given the process • Usually are given SDE, want to ‘solve’ the SDE to find the process • Need to extend Ito’s lemma to be able to do this
Extension of Ito’s Lemma • Consider a stochastic process • And a function of the process • An extension of Ito’s lemma gives
Solving SDE using Extended Ito’s Lemma • Geometric Brownian Motion • Let • Using Ito’s lemma we have
On to the Promised Land Finally some finance After Lunch