200 likes | 343 Views
EDC Model Vision. Rapid changes facing the highway community at all levels in the 21st centuryAdapting to those changes must be a central focus of the FHWA.?Every Day Counts captures what I believe to be the sense of urgency with which we must pursue innovation.? Every Day Counts will seek to
E N D
1. Gregory G. Nadeau
FHWA
Deputy Administrator
Inaugural Webinar on the National Center for Accelerated Bridge Construction
March 11, 2011
2. EDC Model Vision Rapid changes facing the highway community at all levels in the 21st century
Adapting to those changes must be a central focus of the FHWA.
Every Day Counts captures what I believe to be the sense of urgency with which we must pursue innovation.
Every Day Counts will seek to identify and deploy innovation as its highly focused mission.
It is my goal to reach out and engage FHWA employees as well as external stakeholders to deliver innovation that will enable us to become faster, better and smarter.
Victor Mendez, FHWA Fall Business Meeting 2009
3. EDC Model Leadership EDC Requires Top Down and Bottom Up Approach
Agency leadership must prioritize initiatives
Project delivery personnel must be committed
Requires mid-level management champions
“Front lines of project delivery”
4. EDC Partners and Stakeholders AASHTO
ACEC
AGC of America
APWA
ARTBA
LTAP’s & TTAP’s
NACE
……….and growing.
5. EDC Innovation Summits Ten regional summits
All State DOTs, DC, Guam, Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico participated
988 participants
6. Who Was There? By December 14th, all states, DC, Guam, Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico participated in the summits, and over 988 front line officials in the transportation community will have engaged in this process. Approximately 60% of the attendees were State DOT officials.
By December 14th, all states, DC, Guam, Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico participated in the summits, and over 988 front line officials in the transportation community will have engaged in this process. Approximately 60% of the attendees were State DOT officials.
7. What Was Their Interest? Sessions
Use of In-Lieu Fees, Mitigation Banking, Expanding the Use of Programmatic Agreements, Enhanced Tech. Assistance on Stalled EIS 18%
Planning & Environmental Linkages, Legal Sufficiency, Clarifying Scope of Preliminary Engineering 25%
CMCG / DB / ROW / Utilities 24%
Warm Mix Asphalt / Safety Edge 15%
ACS Lite 8%
Prefabricated Bridge Elements / Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil 11%
Shortening Project Delivery initiatives captured 67% of the audience (Technologies 33%) Sessions
Use of In-Lieu Fees, Mitigation Banking, Expanding the Use of Programmatic Agreements, Enhanced Tech. Assistance on Stalled EIS 18%
Planning & Environmental Linkages, Legal Sufficiency, Clarifying Scope of Preliminary Engineering 25%
CMCG / DB / ROW / Utilities 24%
Warm Mix Asphalt / Safety Edge 15%
ACS Lite 8%
Prefabricated Bridge Elements / Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil 11%
Shortening Project Delivery initiatives captured 67% of the audience (Technologies 33%)
8. Every Day CountsState Implementation Team Model
9. SHORTENING PROJECT DELIVERY TOOLKIT The 5 technologies are shown on this visual. The 5 technologies are shown on this visual.
10. ACCELERATING PROJECT DELIVERY
11. TECHNOLOGIES The 5 technologies are shown on this visual. The 5 technologies are shown on this visual.
12. ABC – Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems
13. Deliverables:
* Decision Making Framework for use during planning stage
* Training, Showcases, Webinars, Specifications for PBES elements, ABC manual, Conference Attendance, Awards Program, Demonstration Projects, Process for engaging public in Decision Making process
* Research to quantify environmental impacts reduce by using PBES
* Model Specification/Contract Language, Details - Standard Plans
Deliverables:
* Decision Making Framework for use during planning stage
* Training, Showcases, Webinars, Specifications for PBES elements, ABC manual, Conference Attendance, Awards Program, Demonstration Projects, Process for engaging public in Decision Making process
* Research to quantify environmental impacts reduce by using PBES
* Model Specification/Contract Language, Details - Standard Plans
14. Design Build Design-build is a method of project delivery in which the design and construction phases of a project are combined into one contract, usually awarded on either a low bid or best-value basis. This can provide significant time savings compared with the more traditional design-bid-build approach where the design and construction services must be undertaken in sequence. Design-build is a method of project delivery in which the design and construction phases of a project are combined into one contract, usually awarded on either a low bid or best-value basis. This can provide significant time savings compared with the more traditional design-bid-build approach where the design and construction services must be undertaken in sequence.
15. Construction Manager / General Contractor (CMGC)
The “Construction Manager / General Contractor” (CM/GC) project delivery method is widely used in the vertical construction industry; however, it has only been evaluated by a few transportation agencies for horizontal construction. With this method the owner contracts with a construction management firm for constructability input during design process.
Generally at 60%-90% design completion, the owner and the CM firm negotiate a ‘guaranteed maximum price’ for construction. If successful, the owner signs a contract with the CM firm for the construction of the project. The CM firm becomes a general contractor responsible for scope and schedule at the guaranteed maximum price.
This method is also called Construction Manager @ Risk, General Contractor/Construction Manager (GC/CM), and Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc).
The “Construction Manager / General Contractor” (CM/GC) project delivery method is widely used in the vertical construction industry; however, it has only been evaluated by a few transportation agencies for horizontal construction. With this method the owner contracts with a construction management firm for constructability input during design process.
Generally at 60%-90% design completion, the owner and the CM firm negotiate a ‘guaranteed maximum price’ for construction. If successful, the owner signs a contract with the CM firm for the construction of the project. The CM firm becomes a general contractor responsible for scope and schedule at the guaranteed maximum price.
This method is also called Construction Manager @ Risk, General Contractor/Construction Manager (GC/CM), and Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc).
16. Selected Initiatives
17. EDC Going Forward
Together, we can create a national transportation innovation deployment network
The state based approach will result in the development of a national network of transportation professionals skilled in rapid deployment of innovation
Upon completion of the ten Regional Innovation Summits, over 1000 key stakeholders will be part of the network.Upon completion of the ten Regional Innovation Summits, over 1000 key stakeholders will be part of the network.
18. Sustaining the Network
AASHTO/FHWA Collaboration
Invite stakeholder participation
Evaluate and track progress of current initiatives
Formulate next round of initiatives
Assess AASHTO-AGC-ARTBA proposals
Sources of Innovation AASHTO and FHWA should consider establishing a working group to develop a framework of how we can support and sustain this effort on an ongoing basis from an organizational standpoint. This effort should include EDC stakeholders as well.
AASHTO and FHWA should also initiate the formulation of the next round of EDC initiatives, beginning with assessing the proposals submitted to Administrator Mendez from the AASHTO- AGC- ARBTA Joint Working Group. Timing of new initiatives must take into account progress of current initiatives and organizational capacity to implement.
AASHTO and FHWA should consider establishing a working group to develop a framework of how we can support and sustain this effort on an ongoing basis from an organizational standpoint. This effort should include EDC stakeholders as well.
AASHTO and FHWA should also initiate the formulation of the next round of EDC initiatives, beginning with assessing the proposals submitted to Administrator Mendez from the AASHTO- AGC- ARBTA Joint Working Group. Timing of new initiatives must take into account progress of current initiatives and organizational capacity to implement.
19. EDC Forum
20. Thank You John Horsley and the entire leadership of AASHTO
AGC of America and ARTBA (American Road and Transportation Builders Association)
NACE, (National Association of County Engineers) APWA, (American Public Works Association) LTAPs and TTAPs, ACEC (American Council of Engineering Companies)
Resource Agency Partners