1 / 40

Lattice Statistics on Kagome-Type Lattices

Lattice Statistics on Kagome-Type Lattices. F. Y. Wu Northeastern University. Kagome-type lattices. Syozi. Physics Today, 56 (Feb) 12 (2003). (a). (b). (c). Kagome lattice with an internal structure. Kagome. Triangular kagome. Kagome lattice. 3-12 lattice.

ledell
Download Presentation

Lattice Statistics on Kagome-Type Lattices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lattice Statistics on Kagome-Type Lattices F. Y. Wu Northeastern University

  2. Kagome-type lattices Syozi

  3. Physics Today, 56 (Feb) 12 (2003).

  4. (a) (b) (c) Kagome lattice with an internal structure Kagome Triangular kagome

  5. Kagome lattice 3-12 lattice Kagome lattice with 3-site interactions 3-12 lattice with 3-site interactions

  6. There has been a surge of recent interest in considering the “triangular kagome” lattice such as Closed-packed dimers on the triangular kagome lattice Y. L. Loh, D.-X. Yao, C. L. Carlson, PRB 78, 224410 (2008) Bond percolation on the triangular kagome lattice A. Haji-Ankabari and R. M. Ziff, PRE 79 021118 (2009)

  7. Close-packed dimers on the kagome lattice (and the triangular kagome lattice)

  8. The constant can be determined by a simple mapping F. Y. Wu and F. Wang, Physica A 387 (2008) 4148

  9. Dimer-dimer correlation vanishes identically at distances greater than 2 lattice spacing F. Wang and F. Y. Wu, Physica A 387 (2008) 4157

  10. Potts model on the kagome lattice

  11. Triangular lattice with 3-site interactions Exact duality relation: Baxter, Temperley and Ashley (1978) using algebraic analysis Wu and Lin (1979) using graphical method

  12. Exact duality relation Define , , The duality relation reads , The self-dual point is v=v*,y = y* = q, or Using a continuity argument, Wu and Zia (1981) established that this is indeed the critical point of the ferromagnetic triangular Potts model.

  13. Generalization the critical point is y=q. Generally, for the critical point is C/A=q, or for the lattice

  14. Example 1: 2x2 subnet = 

  15. Bond percolation: q=1, C=qA gives 0.471 628 788 268… (exact) In agreement with Haji-Akbari and Ziff (Phys. Rev. E 79 020102(R) (2009)) who obtained the result using a different consideration

  16. Ising model: q=2, C=qA gives and the Ising critical point 2.236 067 977 500… For the q=3 Potts model, C=qA gives 2.493 123 120 701 …

  17. Example 2: The martini lattice (Wu. PRL 96 (2006) 090602) = For bond percolation with q=1, v=p/(1-p), this gives In agreement with Ziff and Scullard, JPA 39 (2006) 15083

  18. Triangular lattice with alternate 3-site interactions M and 0: M M M Exact expression Conjecture (Wu, 1979) Triangular lattice with alternate 3-site interactions M and N: N M N N M N M

  19. Triangular lattice with 3-site interactions M in every face: M M M M M M M Star-triangle transformation:  Diced lattice

  20. Duality transformation: Diced lattice kagome lattice This gives the kagome critical threshold T (Wu, 1979)

  21. Duality relation for Potts model with multi-site interactions (Essam, 1979; Wu, 1982) N’ N’ K L’ M M K K’ L M’ M’ M’ N N M M M M’ M’ K

  22. General formulation for the kagome-type lattices: Using the exact duality relation . K* L L = K* K M* K K* duality K* M M M* M = Kagome lattice with 2- and 3-site interactions K and M 3-12 lattice with 2- and 3-site interactions K* and M*

  23. L = M* L L Solve F, , , hence , in terms of A, B, C

  24. The conjectured threshold gives the threshold for the general problem in terms of A, B. C = =

  25. More generally, the conjectured threshold gives the threshold for the general A, B. C, A’, B’, C’ problem = =

  26. The 3-12 lattice

  27. For the 3-12 lattice with uniform interactions K, the threshold is: For bond percolation, q=1, v=p/(1-p), this gives (Scullard and Ziff (PRE 73 (2006) 045102) For the Ising model, q=2, this gives = 4.073 446 135 … (Soyzi, 1972)

  28. For the lattice with uniform interactions K:

  29. For percolation, q=1 and v=p/(1-p), this gives = 0.600 870 248 238 … This is compared to the Ziff-Gu (2009) numerical result = 0.600 862 4 For Ising model, q=2 and v=p/(1-p), this gives the exact result 3.024 382 957 092 ,,,,

  30. The End

More Related