150 likes | 259 Views
Maryland Matters. Taylor Lovett Rahul Monga Tammy Tran Ian King. Problem. The easiest way to get information about a topic is to ask people. Better way is to rely on the web and ask a public forum. The more heads that are involved in the search, the more likely you ’ ll find your answer.
E N D
Maryland Matters Taylor Lovett Rahul Monga Tammy Tran Ian King
Problem • The easiest way to get information about a topic is to ask people. • Better way is to rely on the web and ask a public forum. The more heads that are involved in the search, the more likely you’ll find your answer. • But how do you avoid returning irrelevant results?
Example • Survey Monkey + Large amount of traffic + Publicly accessible • Too much information! I don’t want to know about a chipotle in New York, I want to know about the places on Rt. 1. But if the author of the note doesn’t specify which chipotle they’re talking about, how am I supposed to know?
Example • Google Doc Surveys + Easy to maintain and read data • Users need to receive the link to access the survey • Anybody who has the link can input data, but how do you know who has the link?
Solution • Maryland Matters is designed to filter out all of the useless information. • It’s a source of information for Maryland students – by Maryland students. • It’s publicly accessible to all UMD students. Anybody who has a UMD id can access this service and ask questions or read results from other questions
Usability Test Method • Test Subjects • Pre-Test • Usability Test • Post-Test • Feedback/Problems identified
Test Subjects Test Subject 1: A 23 year old, male 4+ year undergraduate student at UMD majoring in economics and English. Test Subject 2: A female graduate student at UMD studying telecommunications. Test Subject 3: A 22 year old, male 4+ year undergraduate student at UMD majoring in psychology. Test Subject 4: A 22 year old, female graduate student at UMD studying computer science.
Pre-Test • Demographic • Educational background • Past survey experiences • Computer competency
Usability Test List of performed tasks: • Registering for a Maryland Matters account • Searching for a survey • Vote/participate in a survey • Comment on a survey • Manage one’s activities • Create a new survey • Manage a created survey
Post-Test • Rate task difficulty • Feedback on: • Usefulness • Preference • Overall look and experience
Usability Test Results Crucial problems identified: • Create a survey does not have a preview feature • Comment box not big enough • Poor survey participation page layout • Search feature not intuitive • List of created and participated surveys (on one's manage account survey page) needs better organization.
Usability Test Results Pros Cons "the layout could be displayed better“ "needs improvement with design“ "[Maryland Matters software] might be biased because only people who are really opinionated will vote" • "simple“ • "easy“ • "convenient“ • "straightforward“ • fairly "intuitive“ • “has potential”
Usability Test Result • Overall, Maryland Matters was recognized as a potentially "great tool to use in order to get feedback", but it would only be useful once it gains a "high volume of students to participate".
Conclusion • Open issues • Lessons learned • Importance of usability testing • Potential additions and future ideas