1 / 15

Leisure & Culture for Improving the Quality of Life

ESP Board Meeting 2 nd December 2003. Leisure & Culture for Improving the Quality of Life. Nikki Enoch and Mike Collins. Presentation Outline. Benefits of leisure and culture Individuals & community Work-life balance Strength of the evidence Biggest benefits Health projects

lefty
Download Presentation

Leisure & Culture for Improving the Quality of Life

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESP Board Meeting 2nd December 2003 Leisure & Culture for Improving the Quality of Life Nikki Enoch and Mike Collins

  2. Presentation Outline • Benefits of leisure and culture • Individuals & community • Work-life balance • Strength of the evidence • Biggest benefits • Health projects • Youth projects • Community building • ‘Bending’ mainstream services • Next tranche of funding • Conclusions

  3. Personal Health - halves CHD risk - reduces blood pressure - controls body weight, diabetes - reduces risk of falls, back pain - reduces risk of colon cancer - reduces anxiety/depression - enhances mood, self-esteem - promotes imagination & vision Socialisation, tolerance, team working Social cohesion Leadership & organising skills Communal/social increases family/local links reduces NHS costs reduces crime and disorder costs community identity thro’ history/culture increases participation by poor, disabled, ethnic minorities increases social networks/activecitizens creates jobs improves environment Leisure & Culture for Improving the Quality of Life

  4. Strength of the Evidence Personal • Health - halves CHD risk     P,L, C - reduces blood pressure     P,L, C - controls body weight, diabetes     P,L, C - reduces risk of falls, back pain     P,L, C - reduces risk of colon cancer     P,L, C - reduces anxiety/depression    P,L - enhances mood, self-esteem     P,L, C, A - promotes imagination & vision A, C • Socialisation, tolerance and team working A, C • Social cohesion A, C • Leadership & organising skills   A,C Rating  Strength of evidence PPopulation studies LLaboratory studies CCase studies AAnecdote

  5. Strength of the Evidence Rating  Strength of evidence PPopulation studies LLaboratory studies CCase studies AAnecdote Communal/social • increases family/local links   A, C • reduces NHS costs   A, C • reduces crime and disorder costs   A, C • community identity through history/culture   A, C • increases participation by poor, disabled, ethnic minorities    P, A, C • increases social networks/activecitizens    P, A, C • creates jobs    P, A, C • improves environment    A, C

  6. Health Estimates extrapolated from national government studies Enfield residents: • 37% are sedentary = 101,200 • 22.5% are obese = 61,500 Savings from 10% increase in activity: • 10% = 17,200 residents • 311 lives • £10.5m • £1.9m NHS • £4.3m loss of earnings • £4.3m premature mortality Source: DCMS: 2002 Game Plan Implementing the Government’s Strategy for Sport Obesity and Inactivity Indicators Source: Prentice & Jebb ‘95

  7. Health Proposals People’s Life Span Best Start (0-14) Aids optimum physical and mental development Reduce Drop Out (13+) Especially females and BEMs (esp. Asians) Fit for Life (55+) Maintains body functions Prevents disability & isolation Same People Most at Risk  Poor Health Quality of Life  Inactivity 55+ (especially women) C2DE, Disabled, BEM Strategic Approach Current Projects/Proposals Health living centres Exercise referrals 55+ Next Logical Target Maintain: CV function, grip, leg strength; avoid osteoporosis and breakages Need More… Walking schemes, activities with hobbies in homes/day centres/senior/cultural clubs

  8. Reducing Youth Crime Diversion Leisure & Culture Activities • ‘Magnet’ projects, Positive Futures, SPLASH, Homework Centres, Black History Month need to ensure continuity of Restorative Justice scheme 46% affected in C2DE groups by kids ‘hanging about’ (res2003) And Structural Changes • 70%of youth crime committed by 7-8% youths • Broken social and fragmented, unanchored leisure lives • Drugs and poor health • Examples: Scott and Jason life histories

  9. Reducing Youth Crime Scott & Jason life history charts

  10. Reducing Youth Crime Concentrated focus and combined effort: • Mentors and activity leaders to work with: • Leisure and culture development officers • Social workers • Police • Health • Education & training • To connect: • Social • Numeracy & literacy • Anti drugs • Social education • Work placements

  11. Building Communities Social cohesion and Active Citizenship by: • Involvement in groups/clubs • Increase social capital: • Support networks • Mutual trust • Organisational skills • Schemes to: • Develop youth & senior sections of sports and arts groups • Increase volunteering • Training to existing and new • Awards for quality and recognition • Make better use of: • Voluntary sites (nights/days) • Grants (e.g. Nottingham Healthy Heart Group) 40% of volunteering from sport and arts Source: Home Office Survey 2003

  12. Leisure & Culture for Improving the Quality of LifeConclusions • Encourage local people to be more active in their neighbourhoods • Encourage embedded local control • Improve health in deprived areas • Reduce crime and fear of crime • Increase accessible and affordable youth activities: • Including new and better ways of diverting away from crime and antisocial behaviour • Involving young people themselves in design and delivery • Promote services to give children and young people a better start • Establish good baselines and monitoring for evidence based assessment

  13. Leisure & Culture for Improving the Quality of LifeReferences (1) Arts Council for England (2002) Arts in health London:ACE Britton, A. and McPherson, K. (In Press). Monitoring the progress of the 2010 target for coronary heart disease mortality London: National Heart Forum Central Council of Physical Recreation (2002A) Saving lives, saving money: physical activity - the best buy in public health London: The CCPR Coalter, F. (2001a) Realising the potential of cultural services: the case for sport; (2001b) the case for the arts; ( 2001c) The case for libraries; (2001d); The case for museums; (2001e) The case for tourism; (2001f); The case for urban parks, spaces,and the countryside; (2001g) The case for children’s play London: Local Government Association Coalter, F. (2002) Sport and Community Development a manual Research Report 86 Edinburgh: sportscotland Coalter, F. (2003) Measuring the impact of sport (unpublished lecture) University of Stirling Coalter, F., Allison, M.. and Taylor, J . (2000) The role of sport in regenerating deprived urban areas Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit Collins, M. F. (2003) Sport and social capital London: Routledge Collins, M.F. et al (1999) Sport and the arts paper for Policy Action Team 10 London: DCMS Countryside Agency (2001a) Walking for Health –the first randomised trial CR Note 18 Cheltenham: CA Countryside Agency et al (2003) The use of public parks in England Cheltenham: CA

  14. Leisure & Culture for Improving the Quality of LifeReferences (2) DCMS (1999) Sport and Arts: Policy Action Team 10 report London: DCMS DCMS (1999) Libraries for All London:DCMS DCMS (2002a) Game Plan: implementing the government’s strategy for sport London: DCMS DCMS (2002b) Social impact of museums: centres for social change London:DCMS Department of Health (2002) Tackling health inequalities: consultation on a plan for delivery London: DoH Enfield Council (2001) Sports strategy for Enfield 2001-2005 Enfield: LB Enfield Enfield Council ( 2002a) Enfield’s future, draft Community strategyEnfield:LB Enfield Enfield Council (2002b) Leisure strategy Enfield:LBE Enfield Council (2002c) Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy: Residerts in priority neighbourhoods Enfield:LB Enfield Enfield Council (2002d) Toward neighbourhood renewal : a draft strategy Enfield: LB Enfield Enfield Council (2003a) Enfield residents 2003 Enfield:LB Enfield Enfield Council (2003b) Voluntary and community sector funding paper Cabinet meeting 25.6.03 Gorard, S. and Taylor, C. (2001) The composition of Specialist Schools: track record and future prospect School Leadership and Management 21,4 365-81 Health Development Agency (1999) Social capital and health London:HDA Health Education Authority (1999) Physical activity and inequalities London: HEA Health Education Authority (1999) Art for health: Social capital for health summary London: HEA

  15. Leisure & Culture for Improving the Quality of LifeReferences (3) Joint Health Survey’s Unit (1999). Health Survey for England: Cardiovascular Disease 1998. London: The Stationery Office. Jackson, A. (2003) Doing it ourselves: Learning to challenge social exclusion through the voluntary arts London: Department for Education and Skills Ladd, J. and Davis, L. (2003) Guide to best practice in sport and urban regeneration London: British Urban Regeneration Association Long, J.et al (2002) Count me in! London:DCMS Lui, Maniadakis, Gray and Raynor (2002) The Economic Cost of Cronoary Heart Disease Reeves, M. (2002) Measuring the social and economic impact of the arts: A review London: Arts Council of England Riddoch,C., Puig-Ribera,A. and Cooper,A. (1998) Effectiveness of physical activity promotion schemes in primary car: A review London: Health Education Authority Splash National Support Team (2003) Splash 2002 Final Report London: Youth Justice Board/Cap Gemini Ernst Young www.homeoffice.gov.uk accessed 14.7.03 Sport England et al (2002) Positive Futures: a review of impact and good practice Summary report London: SE

More Related