1 / 4

-0.8

Supplementary Figure S1: Relationship between cophenetic (COPH.NTS) and genetic distance matrices (DIS.NTS) derived from DArT binary scores among 89 accession of rapeseed. 0.4. 0.2. 0.0. -1.0. -0.8. -0.6. -0.4. -0.2. 0.0. 0.2. 0.4. Dimension 2. -0.2. -0.4. -0.6. -0.8. Dimension 1.

leia
Download Presentation

-0.8

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Supplementary Figure S1: Relationship between cophenetic (COPH.NTS) and genetic distance matrices (DIS.NTS) derived from DArT binary scores among 89 accession of rapeseed

  2. 0.4 0.2 0.0 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 Dimension 2 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 Dimension 1 Supplementary Figure S2(a): Two Dimensional relationships among the 89 rapeseed accessions revealed by principal component analysis of the DArT marker data set derived genetic similarity. The analysis was performed using the NTSYSpc software package (Rohlf 1998). The pair-wise genetic distance was calculated using the Jaccard coefficient (Jaccard 1908). Percentage of variation explained by Axis (dimension) 1 and 2 was 11.4% and 7.3% respectively III II I

  3. Supplementary Fig S2(b): Three Dimensional relationships among the 89 rapeseed accessions revealed by principal component analysis of the DArT marker data set derived genetic similarity. The analysis was performed using the NTSYSpc software package (Rohlf 1998). The pair-wise genetic distance was calculated using the Jaccard coefficient (Jaccard 1908). Percentage of variation explained by Axis (dimension) 1, 2 and 3 was 11.4%, 7.3% and 6.2% respectively III II I

  4. Supplementary Figure S3: Relationships among the 32 accessions of Brassica napus, B. rapa, B. juncea and B. carinata revealed by principal component analysis based on 922 DArT markers analysed in second expt. PCA was performed using NTSYSpc package. Percentage of variation explained by Axis (dimension) 1, 2 and 3 was 29.1%, 17.3% and 12.2% respectively B. napus B. juncea B. rapa B. carinata

More Related