1 / 25

NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS, the case of Poland

NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS, the case of Poland . DR ANDRZEJ SIEMASZKO NATIONAL CONTACT POINT FOR RESEARCH PROGRAMMES OF THE EU. Synergia w wykorzystywaniu środków unijnych. CENTRA DOSKONAŁOŚCI. Wyniki 7PR dla 54 konkursów. pierwszy konkurs ICT. pierwszy konkurs Security.

lela
Download Presentation

NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS, the case of Poland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS, the case of Poland DR ANDRZEJ SIEMASZKO NATIONAL CONTACT POINT FOR RESEARCH PROGRAMMES OF THE EU

  2. Synergia w wykorzystywaniu środków unijnych CENTRA DOSKONAŁOŚCI

  3. Wyniki 7PR dla 54 konkursów

  4. pierwszy konkurs ICT

  5. pierwszy konkurs Security

  6. For all thematic areas, we find a significant degree of funding concentration and network centralization, ie a few institutions dominate What % do the top 10% participants account for? IST and LSH have the highest degree of funding concentration and network centralization.

  7. We also find that IST and LSH exhibit clustering, ie a relatively small number of participants collaborate in two or more projects dominate the networks. High Circle Size = Funding The more funding, the higher the clustering and centralization Clustering Degree to which networks are dominated by participants cooperating in two or more EU funded projects Low Low High Centralization Degree to which networks are dominated by a few participants

  8. ….which then lead to different coordination patterns across thematic areas. • Organizational Roles • Circle size indicates total number of projects coordinating • Arrow size indicates number of projects coordinated • Arrow direction indicates who coordinates whom

  9. socio-economics and the humanities health food, agriculture and biotechnology environment and climate change nanosciences and nanotechnologies, materials and new production technologies information and communication technologies nuclear fission and radiation protection* energy transport (including aeronautics) space security fusion energy* *EURATOM Cooperation – Collaborative research more competition more cooperation

  10. As for new member state integration, Germany and UK are the primary drivers while some new member states are significantly more integrated than others.

  11. New strategy:more cooperation, less competition

  12. Podział budżetu 7PR

  13. nowe elementy 7PR przesunięcie instrumentów w kierunku realizacji wielkich i dużych inicjatyw i przedsięwzięć technologicznych rozwinięcie sfery programowania, realizacji projektów „zamawianych”,„centralnego planowania” i lobbingu budowa ERA skoncentrowanej wokół „twardego jądra” rozszerzenie listy krajów uczestniczących do 38

  14. POLISH TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS • National Technology Platforms - Polish initiative • since 2004 • Currently 29 Polish Technology Platforms • correlated to European Technology Platforms

  15. POLISH TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS correlation ETP – PTP (1)

  16. POLISH TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS correlation ETP – PTP (2)

  17. POLISHTECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS correlation ETP – PTP (3)

  18. POLISH TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS correlation ETP – PTP (4)

  19. OBJECTIVES OF POLISH TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS • Integration of key industrial and research partners of a specific economy sector for joint research, technology development and technology initiatives • Formal coordination structure, cooperation agreement • Cooperation network, supply chain • Research network, cooperation with selected research centers • Close contacts with the Ministry of Research, the Ministry of Economy and other related Ministries • Technology regulatory framework, legal problems • Promotion, lobbing

  20. OBJECTIVES OF POLISH TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS • Active participation in European Technology Platforms • Active role in development of Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) • Participation in working groups, steering committees… • Transfer of Polish initiatives to ETP • Preparation of joint proposals, initiatives • Participation in FP7 collaborative projects • Participation in Joint Technology Initiatives, ERA-Nets and other European initiatives

  21. OBJECTIVES OF POLISH TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS • Active participation in preparation of National Strategic Research Agenda • Active role in development of Sectorial National Strategic Research Agenda • Cooperation with Ministry of Research and National Research and Development Center (NCBR) • Participation in national strategic research projects, Polish Framework Programme • Participation in foresight activities • Optimal use of structural funds (67 billion euro), in particular from „Innovative Economy Operational Programme”

  22. OBJECTIVES OF POLISH TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS • Active participation in regional development • Active role in development of Regional Innovation Strategies, Regions of Knowledge • Cooperation with regional industial and technology clusters • Participation in joint technology and research projects • Optimal use of structural funds at regional level, in particular from Regional Operational Programmes

  23. REGIONS OF KNOWLEDGE

  24. Knowledge based economy

  25. Thank you for your kind attention! andrzej.siemaszko@kpk.gov.pl

More Related