Microrray Data Standardisation

1. Microrray Data Standardisation Microarray Gene Expression Database group -- MGED December, 2000

2. Public data repositories for microarray data There is a growing consensus in the life science community for a need for public repositories of gene expression data analogous to DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank for sequences

3. Some of the reasons: • Gradually building up gene expression profiles for various organisms, tissues, cell types, developmental stages, various states, under influence of various compounds • Through links to other genomics databases builds up systematic knowledge about gene functions and networks • Comparison of profiles, access and analysis of data by third parties • Cross validation of results and platforms - quality control

4. Systematic gene expression profiling initiatives in public domain The International Life Science Institute (ILSI) is coordinating a program undertaken by ~25 pharmaceutical and food companies to generate toxicity related gene expression data under defined experimental conditions • evaluate gene expression profiles in standardised test systems following exposure to toxicants • relate changes in gene expression to other measures of toxicity

5. Microarray data handling and analysis - a major bottleneck (Calculations by Jerry Lanfear) • Experiments: • 100 000 genes in human • 320 cell types • 2000 compounds • 3 time points • 2 concentrations • 2 replicates • Data • 8 x 1011 data-points • 1 x 1015 = 1 petaB of data

6. Expression data repository projects • Public repositories in making: • GEO - NCBI • GeneX - NCGR • ArrayExpress - EBI • In-house databases - Stanford, MIT, University of Pennsylvania, • Organism specific databases: Mouse in Jackson • Proprietary databases - Gene Logic, NCI

7. Difficulties • Raw data are images • What is needed for higher level analysis and mining is gene expression matrix (genes/samples/gene expression levels) • lack of standard measurement units for gene expression • lack of standards for sample annoation

8. Raw data - images Treated sample labeled red (Cy5) Control data labeled green (Cy3) Competitive hybridization onto chip Red dot - gene overexpressed in treated sample Green dot - gene underexpressed in treated sample Yellow - equally expressed Intensity - “absolute” level red/green - ratio of expression 2 - 2x overexpressed 0.5 - 2x underexpressed log2( red/green ) - “log ratio” 1 2x overexpressed -1 2x underexpressed cDNA plotted microarray Stanford university (Yeast,1997)

9. Gene expression matrix Samples Genes Gene expression levels

10. Gene expression levels • What we would like to have • gene expression levels expressed in some standard units (e.g. molecules per cell) • reliability measure associated with each value (e.g. standard deviation) • What we do have • each experiment using different units • no reliability information

11. cm inc Comparing expression data

12. ? ? Comparing expression data

13. Comparing expression data

14. Measurement units • In perspective: • standard controls for experiments (on chips and in the samples) • replicate measurements • Temporary solution: • storing intermediate analysis results (including the images) and annotations of how they were obtained - i.e., the evidence

15. Comparing expression data - problem 2 • How gene names relate in different data matrices? • How samples relate in different data matrices?

16. Sample annotation • Gene expression data have any meaning only in the context of what are the experimental conditions of the target system • Controlled vocabularies and ontologies (species, cell types, compound nomenclature, treatments, etc) are needed for unambiguous sample annotation • Sample annotations in current public databases are typically useless

17. In perspective • Standard units for gene expression measurements • Standards for sample annotation.

18. More immediate actions • To understand what information about microarray experiments should be captured to make the descriptions reasonably self-contained • Develop data exchange format able to capture this minimum information • Develop recommendations how data should be normalised and what controls should be used

19. MGED group The MGED group is an open discussion group initially established at the Microarray Gene Expression Database meeting MGED 1 (14-15 November, 1999, Cambridge, UK). The goal of the group is to facilitate the adoption of standards for DNA-array experiment annotation and data representation, as well as the introduction of standard experimental controls and data normalisation methods. The underlying goal is to facilitate the establishing of gene expression data repositories, comparability of gene expression data from different sources and interoperability of different gene expression databases and data analysis software. Since 1999 the group has had two general meetings and the third one is planned for 2001 For more see www.mged.org

20. Affymetrix Berkeley DDBJ DKFZ EMBL Gene Logic Incyte Max Plank Institute NCBI NCGR NHGRI Sanger Centre Stanford Uni Pennsylvania Uni Washington Whitehead Institute MGED participants including

21. Working groups • Microarray experiment annotations and minimum information standards (A. Brazma) • XML-data communication standards and interfaces (P. Spellman) • Ontology for sample description (M. Bittner) • Cross platform comparison and normalisation (F.Holstege, R.Bumgarner) • Future user group - queries, query languages and data mining (M. Vingron)

22. MGED state of art • Formulation of the “minimum information about a microarray experiment” (MIAME) to ensure its interpretability and reproducibility • Data exchange format based on XML - microarray markup language (MAML) submitted to OMG in November

23. MIAME six parts: 1. Experimental design: the set of the hybridisation experiments as a whole 2. Array design: each array used and each element (spot) on the array 3. Samples: samples used, the extract preparation and labeling 4. Hybridizations: procedures and parameters 5. Measurements: images, quantitation, specifications 6. Controls: types, values, specifications see www.mged.org for details

24. MIAME concepts • MIAME is aimed at co-operative data submitter • Concept of “qualifier, value, source” lists, where source is either user defined or an external reference • Reusable information can be referenced, but should be provided at least once (array descriptions, standard protocols) • Raw data should be reported, together with the authors interpretations

25. MAML • MAML is an XML based data exchange format able to capture MIAME compliant information • The work is still in progress, the first draft has been submitted to OMG as a data exchange standard for microarray data

26. MAML concepts • Annotations + data; data can be given as a set of external 2D matrices • Data format independent on particular scanner or image analysis sofwater • Sample and treatment can be represented as a DAG • Concept of composite images and composite spots

27. Sample and treatment representation Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Treatments Array 2 Array 1

28. Images Samples Genes Spots Gene expression levels Spot/Image quantiations Expression matrix - raw and processed 

29. Microarray image analysis data representation Spots Quantitations composite spots primary spots Images composite images e.g., green/red ratios primary images

30. MAML future • The NOMAD microarray LIMS system will export data in MAML format • ArrayExpress and GEO will import data in MAML format • We hope that OMG will accept MAML as the industry standard • We hope that MAML will become a defacto standard

31. MGED steering committee • Meeting in Bethesda on 17 Nov 2000 • MIAME accepted and a publication urging the journals and funding agencies to adopt it will be prepared • MGED will become ISCB Special Interest Group • Next general MGED meeting in Stanford, March 29-31

32. Top level object model for gene expression database