1 / 18

2009. 05. Hanjo Lim School of Electrical & Computer Engineering hanjolim @ajou.ac.kr

2009. 05. Hanjo Lim School of Electrical & Computer Engineering hanjolim @ajou.ac.kr. Lecture 4. Electrons and lights in 1D periodic structures. Electrons in a 1D potential : Nearly free and Kronig-Penny model.

lenora
Download Presentation

2009. 05. Hanjo Lim School of Electrical & Computer Engineering hanjolim @ajou.ac.kr

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2009. 05. Hanjo Lim School of Electrical & Computer Engineering hanjolim@ajou.ac.kr Lecture 4. Electrons and lights in 1D periodic structures

  2. Electrons in a 1D potential : Nearly free and Kronig-Penny model. • Free electrons ; electrons at BZ boundary meets total reflection • corresponding to interference effect • represented by standing waves of • the form • and • Charge density peaks at • Charge density is zero there and peaks between the atoms. • Electrons in state see more of the attractive potential than those in free • electron state which have Note that • Electrons in see less of the attractive potential than free electrons. • ∴ Electrons in state lie lower (higher) in energy than the free • electron value at the BZ boundary.

  3. At BZ boundary with the crystal potential satisfying • with an integer • Let (Note Fourier theorem) • and normalization of the wave length of the box. • multiply • Then, kinetic term, let • equals not zero only when • Since the potential is real and symmetric the integral becomes

  4. Likewise, we can prove that normalized wave function • satisfying the Schroedinger eq. • gives the eigenenergy which is higher than • We could also extend our calculation to evaluate and at the 2nd, 3rd, • etc, BZ boundaries, i.e. at with the bandgaps given • by the Fourier components of the crystal potential. • Kronig-Penny Model • with • => Sol.: with and

  5. => Show the existence of bandgap and the dependence of on • When electron energy the bandgap appears at the BZ boundaries. • As electrons are confined more around the atoms, becomes larger. • Note the correlation between Fourier components of the and value. • What if the electrons are far from the BZ boundary? Free electrons.

  6. Multilayer Film: Physical origins of the PBGs • 1D PhC ; alternating layers of materials with and and a period commonlyusedfor dielectric mirror, optical filters, and resonators • 1) Traditional approach; propagation of plane • wave and multiple reflections at the interfaces. • 2) PhC approach ; symmetry approach with index • of the modes; and band number • Let the modes have as a Bloch form with the • translational invariance for • The CTS in the xy-plane can take any value. • The DTS in the z-direction representation of in the 1st BZ • => photonic band(PB) diagram.

  7. consider • i) If uniform dielectric medium, • with an assigned artificial period • bands are continuous. • ii) If nearly uniform dielectric medium light line and a small PBG between the upper and lower branches of the PB structure. • PBG : frequency range in which no mode can exist regardless of value. • iii) If periodic medium with high dielectric constant a PB diagram showing a large PBG. • Note) Most of the promising applications of 2D or 3D PhCs rely on the location and width of PBG. a wave propagating in the z-direction for the 3 cases of periodic dielectric films in the z-direction.

  8. Physical origin of the PBG formation ; understandable considering the field mode profiles for the states immediately above and below the gap • Occurrence of the gap between bands at the BZ edge means that the PBG appears at • Note) Standing wave formation at is the origin of the band gap (nearly free electron model in solid state theory). • ∴ PBG is formed by the multiple reflections forming the standing waves.

  9. The way of standing wave formation; from the EM variational theorem. • i) If nearly uniform dielectric medium • standing waves at • Note) Any other distribution with same frequency violates the symmetry. • Origin of frequency difference ; due to field concentration to a high- • and low- dielectrics (not fully sinusoidal). => dielectirc band, air band. • ii) If periodic medium with a higher dielectric • contrast the field energy for both • band is primarily concentrated in the high- • layers but the 1st being more concentrated in • the high- material. high- material: lowest energy distribution, low- material: field distribution normal to ground state.

  10. Note that, in 1D PhCs, i) PBG always appears for any dielectirc contrast • the smaller the contrast, the smaller the gaps. ii) Occurs between • every set of bands at BZ’s edge or its center. Why? • Evanescent modes in PBGs: defect or surface state. • EM wave propagating in the 1D PhC; Bloch wave • Meaning of no states in PBG; no extended states given by Bloch form. • What happens if an EM wave whose frequency falls in the PBGs is sent • to the surface? No EM modes are allowed in the PhC: No purely real • exists for any mode at that frequency. Then is it reflected just • from the surface or exists in the PhC as an evanescent modes localized • at the surface? What determinates the field distribution in the reflection phenomena? If evanescent modes from the surface, how behaves?

  11. Decaying field, i.e., evanescent wave from the surface should have a complex wave vector as giving the skin depth as • If normal incidence, • Consider near the band minimum at • for band minimum • with ◉ likewise Reflecting metal Non ideal conductor 1D photonic crystal

  12. For (i.e. in the 2nd band), real Bloch states. • For (i.e. within the gap), purely imaginary decay of the wave with attenuation coefficient). • As ∴ band gap must be wide enough for a good reflection. • Note ; Evanescent modes • There is no way to excite them in a perfect crystal of infinite extent. But • a defect or edge in the PhCs might sustain such a mode. => defect states, • defect modes, surface states, surface modes. • One or more evanescent modes localized at the defect (defect states) may • be compatible depending on the symmetry of a given defect. • The states near the middle of the gap are localized much more tightly • than the states near the gap’s edge. are solutions of the eigenvalue problem, do not satisfy the translational symmetry.

  13. Localized states near the surface: surface states • Similarity of localized states between the PhCs and semiconductors; • shallow donors and acceptors, extrinsic or intrinsic defects. • Off-axis propagation in the 1D PhCs (ex: let ) • 1) Because of non-existence of periodic dielectric arrangements in the • off-axis direction, there are no band gaps for off-axis propagation when • all possible are considered. • 2) For on-axis propagation (normal incidence), field in the x-y plane; • degenerate, i.e., x- or y-polarization differ only bya rotationalsymmetry. • ∴ We may take field (polarization) as x- or y-direction as convenient. • * For a mode propagating insome off-axis -direction, broken symmetry • → lifted degeneracy • must be wide enough for a good reflection. • exist a perfect mode • Off-axis propagation • ex) • 1) Nonexistence of band gaps for off-sxis propagation when all possible • are considered. Because of no periodic dielectric arrangement.

  14. ex) A wave propagating in y-direction (reflect. invariance on yz-plane) • Possible polarizations; x-direction or in the yz-plane. • Absence of rotational symmetry between the x-polarized wave and yz- • polarized wave → different relations for x- and yz-polarized waves. • ∴ Degenerate bands for the waves propagating in the z-direction split into two distinct polarizations. • ① Different slopes for different polarization • means different velocity, i.e., from • with the band and polarization index smaller • slope of the photonic band => smaller velocity • due to different field confinement. • ②Approximately linear relations for any band in the long-wavelength • limit => homogeneous dielectric medium.

  15. The variation of in the photonic crystal is smoothed out in the scale of • the long wavelength EM wave: homogenization phenomena. => effective • dielectric constants depending on and polarization direction. • ex) x-polarized modes have a lower frequency than the modes polarized in the yz-plane for the wave with on 1D PhC of • The field distributions at a long-wavelength limit show the reason. • The field lies in the high- regions for the x-polarized wave and crosses • the low- & high- regions for the wave polarized in the yz-plane. • Asymptotic behavior of the modes for large • (short ) region: Bandwidth • for large value, especially below the line • because of the exponential decay of the modes.

  16. Defect modes: modes localized at a defect. • Defects: a structure that destroys a perfectly periodic lattice (ex: a layer • having different width or than the rest in 1D PhCs). • Consider the on-axis propagation of a mode with the frequency in the • PBG via a defect in 1D PhCs. • Introducing a defect will not change the fact that there are no extended • modes with freq. inside the periodic lattice, since the destruction of • periodicity prevents describing the modes • of the system with wave vector • Then a resonant mode of the defect ↔ • extended states inside the rest of PhC? (Yes)

  17. Defect state: can be interpreted as localized at defect and exponentially • decay inside the rest, i.e. a wave surrounded by two dielectric mirrors. • If the thickness of a defect becomes of the order of quantized modes • → Fabry-Perot resonator/filter (band pass filter) • If a defect is the high- material, as increases (why?) with the • increase of decay rate as • Density of states : # of allowed states per unit increase in frequency • Interaction (or interference) between two different localized states. • Interaction of modes at the interface between two different PhCs: • possible if the two PBG overlap. Existence of a mode having • Surface states: localized modes at the surface of a PhC. • Surface: there is a PBG only in the PhC, and no PBG in the air.

  18. Therefore, we should consider four possibilities depending on whether • the EM wave is decaying or extended in the air or PhC for all possible • If an EM mode is decaying in the PhC • (a mode whose lies in the PBG) and • also in the air ( below the light line) • → EM mode is localized at the surface • → Surface states. • Note: All four cases are possible in the case of • the structure described at the legend of left • figure. • It can be shown that every layered material (1D PhC) has surface modes • for some termination. Band structure of 1D PhC with =13( =0.2a) and =1( =0.8a) with the termination of high dielectic layer with 0.1a thickness.

More Related