270 likes | 339 Views
Dynamic Properties of High Endurance Gears. Heron A. Rodrigues, Masa Hanada, Ryu Goto, and Ron Steranko. Engineered Sintered Components, Inc. 250 Old Murdock Road Troutman, North Carolina 28166. Dynamic Properties of High Endurance Gears. Impact + Fatigue = Impact-Fatigue Life.
E N D
Dynamic Properties of High Endurance Gears Heron A. Rodrigues, Masa Hanada, Ryu Goto, and Ron Steranko Engineered Sintered Components, Inc. 250 Old Murdock Road Troutman, North Carolina 28166
Dynamic Properties of High Endurance Gears Impact + Fatigue = Impact-Fatigue Life
OBJECTIVES • Enhance the dynamic properties of high endurance pinion gears • Evaluate the dynamic properties by simulating actual field conditions • Clarify the relationship between the impact-fatigue strength properties and the material structure.
Experimental Mix Compositions and Green Density Compacted at 690 MPa (50 Tsi).
Determination of Ideal Sintering Conditions (Mix K Baseline)
SUMMARY • Dynamic properties of high endurance gears were evaluated by simulating field service conditions with an impact-fatigue test rig. • P/M mixes utilizing three alloying modes with varying amounts of Ni, Cu, Mo, and C were evaluated for dynamic performance. • To limit processing costs, gears were single pressed and sintered, then heat treated.
CONCLUSIONS • Higher sintering temperature = significant improvement in impact fatigue properties • Significant improvement when Ni content increased from 4% to 6% • Carbon also beneficial, except in material F, which performed well even without added carbon
CONCLUSIONS (cont.) • A density increase within a given alloying mode results in improvement of 95% IFL • No correlation was evident between the 95% IFL and mechanical properties such as hardness, radial crush strength and tooth strength
CONCLUSIONS (cont.) • The pre-alloy based material D resulted in optimum 95% IFL: • Homogeneous microstructure • Strong matrix • Large rounded pores • Higher mean pore spacing
CONCLUSIONS (cont.) • Elemental (F) and partial alloy (J) mixes: • Slightly better average IFL than mix D • Lower 95% IFL due to microstructural variation