The Future of Society

1. The Future of Society “We are engaged in a revolution; a technological revolution. We have commenced an era where computers, databases, and the internet handle tasks formally completed by the human hand and mind. We live in and at our computers. We do not have to leave the comfort of our own computer station any longer. Everything imaginable can be found on the internet; from research, to shopping, to business transactions, to love. It is not us that makes technology obsolete, it is our technology which is making us obsolete. We are the computers, the computers are us.” http://www.uvm.edu/~artclass/cyborg/NateCloutier.html

2. The Future of Society Think of your life before the answering machine, the ATM, e-mail. Think of your grandparents' lives before the television and the airplane. Think of your great-grandparents' lives before the telephone. All told, the shift will be that substantial. Machines will recognize our faces and our fingerprints. They will watch out for swimmers in distress, for radioactivity- and germ-laden terrorists, for red-light runners and highway speeders, for diabetics and heart patients. Imagine devices that monitor the breathing rhythms of infants in cribs, watch toddlers at day care, and track children as they go to and from school; that can keep an eye on our home supply of orange juice and let us know when the milk is sour. Machines might watch our calorie intake and burn-off, monitor air quality in our homes, and look out for mice and bugs. Envision sensors as large as walls and as small as molecules in your bloodstream sending quiet signals to nearby computers, which will process and relay information to you, your doctor, your lawyer, your grocer, your building manager, your car mechanic, your local fire or police department. As time and technology march on, less and less will escape the attention of sophisticated machines. They'll have us covered. http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0311/feature1/index.html http://www.janis-purucker.de/3dgallery/utopia.jpg

3. Who controls who? “We shape our buildings and afterwards they shape us.” Winston Churchill. www.hasekamp.net/thailand/thailand1.jpg www.tickintsofcentralohio.org/images/Historical/Horseless_carriage_ca._1915.jpg

4. What was the role of (information) technology in Sept 11th? http://www.ptb.be/scripts/center.phtml?section=A1AAAABS http://media.guardian.co.uk/gallery/image/0,8560,-10904255171,00.html

5. What is he talking about? “We have one here at Cambridge; there is one in Manchester and there ought to be one in Scotland as well but that is about all.” Douglas Hartree 1947 quoted in The Dream Machine p 8.

6. Growth in technology…. Manchester Mark I www.man.ac.uk/Science_Engineering/CHSTM/nahc.htm

7. http://foodman123.com/ibm709.htm IBM 709 ~1955

8. DEC 2060 – Early 1980’s DEC 2060 with 1 million 36-bit words of MOS memory, PDP-11 front end, PDP-11 sync communications, 1 RP06 176 MB disk, 2 RP07 498MB disks. Running TOPS-20 with FORTRAN-20, COBOL-68/74, BASIC-PLUS-2, CPL-20, and MS (a mail system). http://www.hawaii.edu/infobits/s2000/images/dec2.jpg

9. Moore’s “Law” Moore's law (rule of thumb) - processor power doubles every 2 years List of Intel Processorshttp://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/quickrefyr.htm

10. Developments

11. Computers in Towson in 2008 • How many computers will there be in Towson when you graduate? • How powerful will they be: processor, memory, etc. • What will the situation be in 2018?

12. The future of technology…. • “Early in the next millennium your right and left cuff links or earrings may communicate with each other by low orbiting earth satellites and have more computing power than your present PC. Your telephone won’t ring indiscriminately; it will receive, sort, and perhaps respond to your incoming calls like a well trained English butler”. • [Being Digital. N. Negroponte, 1995.]

13. The Home of The Future • Changing Places/House_n The MIT Home of the Future Consortium - architecture.mit.edu/house_n/ • Welcome to the Broadband Home of the Future Wired Magazine article January 2004 www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.01/wiredhome_1.html

14. Cybernetics • “I was born human. But it was an accident of fate – a condition merely of time and place. I believe it’s something we have the power to change…..” • www.kevinwarwick.com

15. “Impact Of IT Upon Society Good Things Bad Things

16. Convergence! Communications IT Convergence Computers Communications Applications Content

17. The Information Society Communications IT The Information Society

18. A day in the life….. • Many examples in the press and media of home and work in the future….. www.arch.usyd.edu.au/kcdc/vds96/elective/images/nc.gif

19. Technology & Society “NAIVE MODEL” OF TECHNOLOGICALDEVELOPMENT ART LAW Technology WORK Set of feasible applications - expanding LEISURE ECONOMY Society

20. 2 Things to Note Pervasive != Important Rate of change

21. Rate of Change • The first steam powered cotton mill in the US dated from 1847 - sixty three years after its adoption in Britain. • The first electronic computers were developed in the mid forties. • Fifty years later we have………..

22. Pervasive • Not All Pervasive Technologies Are “Important” • Zip fasteners and matchsticks are clearly not all that important. • The automobile, radio and TV, electricity and printing have greater claims to importance. • Why is this?

23. What does history tell us? Technology has always had a huge influence upon the development of society. Examples?

24. Some Previous Technologies& Social Change • Farming • settled life, villages. • Industrial revolution. • Output increased faster than labor input. • Work centralized in factory units. • Land declined as the chief source of wealth. • Urbanization. • Train network, printing press, sanitation, mechanical clocks, the telescope etc. etc.

25. The Telegraph • See “The Victorian Internet” for a very interesting discussion. • Effects include • Commerce – stock exchange • The .com phenomenon • News reporting – Crimean War/Florence Nightingale • World Peace!” • "It brings the worlds together. It joins the sundered hemispheres. It unites distant nations, making them feel that they are members of one great family". [Standange 98] • http://www2.arts.gla.ac.uk/SESLL/STELLA/STARN/scotplay/SMITH/CARNEGIE/act1.htm

26. The Case of the Automobile [Kling 96] • Originally promoted as a clean mode of private transport. • Today society is strongly dependent upon the private car with accompanying, pollution and traffic jams. • Deaths due to accidents • 400-500 each holiday weekend in the USA. (Kling) • Helped give rise to suburbia and the decline of urban centers. • The road infrastructure requires huge on going public investment • Dependence upon oil. • 1970’s oil crisis, the Gulf War (I) and (II), …..

27. Neutral • Technology May Not Be Neutral • Often With Technology Society Gets More Than It Bargained For!

28. A Variety of Views http://www..pensacolabeach.com/ domeofahome/ http://www.filmarchiv.at/events/lang/metropolis.htm

29. Dawn of a new age…. • “Within a few short decades, society rearranges itself - its worldview, its basic values, its social and political structures, its arts, its key institutions. Fifty years later there is a new world. And the people born then cannot even imagine the world in which their grandparents lived and into which their own parents were born.” • Peter Drucker. Post Capitalist Society, 1993.

30. Negroponte’s View • The change from atoms to bits is irrevocable and unstoppable. P4 • Computing is not about computers any more it is about living. P6. • Early in the next millennium your right and left cuff links or earrings may communicate with each other by low orbiting earth satellites and have more computing power than your present PC. Your telephone won’t ring indiscriminately; it will receive, sort, and perhaps respond to your incoming calls like a well trained English butler. P6. • On-demand information will dominate digital life. We will ask explicitly and implicitly for what we want, when we want it. P169. • The information superhighway is more than a short cut to every book in the Library of Congress. It is creating a totally new, global social fabric. P183. • [Being Digital. N. Negroponte, 1995.]

31. Chris Evans’ View (1980) In the home in the short term future (early 1980s) there will be • “speaking bathroom scales, freezers which remind you to restock them, cookers which tell how the meat is coming along, telephones that tell you how many people have rung in your absence……thermometers which advice you what to wear before you get up." (p79) • “The first practical shift will be reflected in a cut in the working week to an average of 30 hours, a retirement option at fifty five or even fifty, and annual vacations of at least six weeks”. (p95) • [Evans C., The Mighty Micro, Cornet, 1979]

32. Thoreau (1850) • Technology for Technology’s Sake? “...so with a hundred other ‘modern improvements’ ..... our inventions are wont to be pretty toys which distract our attention from serious things. They are but an improved means to an unimproved end..…” “Walden” by Henry Thoreau 1818-1862

33. Kling’s View • The Seductive Equation of Technological Progress with Social Progress. “Social Revolutions are based on changes in ways of life, not just changes in equipment…..”

34. Steve Talbott “No law seems more certain than this one: the next generation of computers will be better than the last. Yet no law conceals a more socially devastating lie.” [Netfuture, #1, Dec, 1995] “I recently heard an industry pundit say, "As voice recognition technology gets more sophisticated, we can expect computers to become more user-friendly.“ Self-evidently true? Let's consider. Perhaps the most conspicuous application of voice recognition today is in telephone answering systems. The idea, of course, is that better listening skills will enable the software to deal more flexibly with your and my needs. The notorious klunkiness of the current answering systems will yield to friendlier capabilities. In a sense, this is true. When I call a business in the future, the options will be more numerous, and I'll be able to negotiate those options with voice commands more complex than "yes" and "no." But this is to ignore an obvious fact about the new capabilities: their reach will be extended. Where earlier software eventually routed you to a human operator, the "friendlier" version will replace the operator with a software agent who will attempt to conduct a crude conversation with you. So the earlier frustrations will simply be repeated -- but at a much more critical level. Where once you finally reached a live person, now you will reach a machine. And if you thought the number-punching phase was irritating, wait until you have to communicate the heart of your business to a computer with erratic hearing, a doubtful vocabulary of 400 words, and the compassion of a granite monolith! The technical opportunity to become friendlier, in other words, is also an opportunity to become unfriendly at a more decisive level. This is the prevailing law of technological development, underlying nearly every claim of progress. “ [Netfuture, #1, Dec, 1995, http://www.netfuture.org/1995/Dec1495_1.html#3]

35. Digital Age Nonsense I sometimes wonder whether the folks at the M.I.T. Media Lab are pullingour legs. Are they stand-up comedians in disguise?It seems that a lot of energy at the prestigious lab (which claims to be"inventing the future") is going into the redesign of the Americankitchen. For example, one project involves training a glass counter top to assemble the ingredients for making fudge by reading electronic tags on jars of mini-marshmallows and chocolate chips, then coordinatingtheir quantities with a recipe on a computer and directing a microwave oven to cook it. Dr. Andrew Lippman, associate director of the Media Lab, says that "mydream tablecloth would actually move the things on the table. You throwthe silver down on it, and it sets the table." One waits in vain for the punch line. These people actually seem to beserious. And the millions of dollars they consume look all too much likeserious money. Then there are the corporate sponsors, falling all overthemselves to throw yet more money at these projects. Nowadays this kind of adolescent silliness is commonly given the halo of arationale that has becomerespected dogma. [Netfuture, #87, March 30, 1999, http://www.netfuture.org/1999/Mar3099_87.html#2c]

36. Views of/on Technologists • “Computer Science … is the systematic study of algorithms….” [ACM task force quoted in Kling p33]. • “A man trained in computer science alone is by any definition an uneducated man” – [C. Holland, The Idea of A University]. • “Whether or not it draws upon new scientific research, technology is a branch of moral philosophy, not of science”, [Kling, p33].

37. Globalisation Communications IT The Information Society is a Global Society

38. Charles Handy - Globalisation • In the large “Today we are faced with the complexity of the global community. Decision makers have to operate beyond the traditional limits of national boundaries and regulations, beyond the conventions of a particular culture.” • In the small “Life is now horribly confusing. We are mixing up home and work, and work is no longer secure.” Charles Handy

39. Essential Argument • The role of (Digital) Technology in all this change, globalisation, information society, employment, views of humanity etc. etc. • The role of Engineers in all this….. • The role of Education in all this…..