570 likes | 586 Views
Learn about scientific thinking, peer review, evaluating hypotheses, and unscientific thinking in this comprehensive guide. Explore the importance of quantitative reasoning and critical thinking in scientific endeavors.
E N D
THE SCIENTIFIC CONTEXT Dr. Sam Miller Weather & Climate – MTDI 1200OL Plymouth State University 1
What does it mean to think scientifically? Scientific thinking is quantitative reasoning, which is a form of critical thinking.
What does it mean to think scientifically? Scientific thinking is quantitative reasoning, which is a form of critical thinking. Means: • How? • How much? • When? • Where? Does not mean: • Why?
What does it mean to think scientifically? Scientific thinking is quantitative reasoning, which is a form of critical thinking. Means: • Willing to be skeptical about claims • Demanding evidence • “Logical” is not the same thing as “true” Does not mean: • Cynical • Decision to stick to beliefs regardless of overwhelming evidence contradicting them
Sound science requires that scientists in a given field evaluate each other’s work. Peer review is a mechanism to wring out error and keep ourselves honest. We build on each other’s work and don’t want to start from mistaken information. We trust Newton’s F = ma and other theories because they have been so rigorously tested.
Sound science requires that scientists in a given field evaluate each other’s work. Peer review is a mechanism to wring out error and keep ourselves honest. We build on each other’s work and don’t want to start from mistaken information. We trust Newton’s F = ma and other theories because they have been so rigorously tested.
Sound science requires that scientists in a given field evaluate each other’s work. Peer review is a mechanism to wring out error and keep ourselves honest. We build on each other’s work and don’t want to start from mistaken information. We trust Newton’s F = ma and other theories because they have been so rigorously tested.
Sound science requires that scientists in a given field evaluate each other’s work. Peer review is a mechanism to wring out error and keep ourselves honest. We build on each other’s work and don’t want to start from mistaken information. We trust Newton’s F = ma and other theories because they have been so rigorously tested.
How do you evaluate a scientific hypothesis? Is it theoretically sound?
How do you evaluate a scientific hypothesis? • Is it theoretically sound? • Does it make any testable predictions?
How do you evaluate a scientific hypothesis? • Is it theoretically sound? • Does it make any testable predictions? • Reproducible measurements (no position of privilege)?
How do you evaluate a scientific hypothesis? • Is it theoretically sound? • Does it make any testable predictions? • Reproducible measurements (no position of privilege)? • Do the observations support the hypothesis?
How do you evaluate a scientific hypothesis? • Is it theoretically sound? • Does it make any testable predictions? • Reproducible measurements (no position of privilege)? • Do the observations support the hypothesis? • Does the resulting theory make correct predictions?
Examples of unscientific thinking: “It is true because I believe it.”
Examples of unscientific thinking: “It is true because I believe it.” “It is true because we believe it.”
Examples of unscientific thinking: • “It is true because I believe it.” • “It is true because we believe it.” • “It is true because I want to believe it.”
Examples of unscientific thinking: • “It is true because I believe it.” • “It is true because we believe it.” • “It is true because I want to believe it.” • “It is true because I have always believed it.”
Examples of unscientific thinking: • “It is true because I believe it.” • “It is true because we believe it.” • “It is true because I want to believe it.” • “It is true because I have always believed it.” • “It is true because it is in my best interests to believe it.”
Examples of unscientific thinking: • “It is true because I believe it.” • “It is true because we believe it.” • “It is true because I want to believe it.” • “It is true because I have always believed it.” • “It is true because it is in my best interests to believe it.” • “It is true because someone in authority wants me to believe it.”
To manage scales that may range over many orders of magnitude, we use: Scientific Notation Exponentials Powers of Ten
100 x Larger 100 x Smaller
1000 x Larger 1000 x Smaller
1,000,000 x Larger 1,000,000 x Smaller
Short Video Powers of Ten
Solar System Objects SUN JUPITER EARTH DIAMETER ~ 800,000 MILES [ 100 Earth diameters ] ~ 80,000 [ 10 Earth diameters ] ~ 8,000
Solar System Objects SOLAR MASS 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Kg 2 x 1030 Kg [ ~ 330,000 Earth masses ] JOVIAN MASS 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Kg 2 x 1027 Kg [ ~ 330 Earth masses ] TERRESTRIAL MASS 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Kg 6 x 1024 Kg
Earth – Moon System EARTH MOON DISTANCE ~ 250,000 MILES [ About 30 Earth diameters ]
Earth – Moon System EARTH’S MOON Diameter: 2,200 Miles [ ~1/4 Earth diameter ] Mass: 7 x 1022 Kg [ ~ 1/100th Earth mass ] Composition: Earth continental rock EARTH MOON
Earth – Sun System (Disks and distances between them are not on the same scale) SUN EARTH DISTANCE ~ 95,000,000 MILES [ About 12,000 Earth diameters ]
Solar System (graphic: www.nineplanets.org)
Solar System INNER PLANETS
Solar System INNER PLANETS MERCURY VENUS MARS EARTH (graphic: www.nineplanets.org)
Solar System OUTER PLANETS
Solar System OUTER PLANETS JUPITER
Solar System OUTER PLANETS SATURN
Solar System OUTER PLANETS URANUS
Solar System OUTER PLANETS NEPTUNE
Solar System DIAMETER ~ 8,000,000,000 MILES [ About 1 million Earth diameters ]
Solar System Age of the Solar System: About 5 billion years
Short Video The Age of Earth (from The Creation of The Universe)