460 likes | 999 Views
TRUST. FUNDAMENTAL REQUIREMENT OF INDIVIDUAL IN ORDER TO SURVIVE. IT IS A TWO WAY PROCESS. IT IS UTMOST NECESSARY TO GIVE AND RECEIVE TRUST IN ORDER TO SUCCECEED. WITHOUT TRUST ACHIEVING ANY THING IS IMPOSSIBLE. WHY WE TRUST.
E N D
TRUST • FUNDAMENTAL REQUIREMENT OF INDIVIDUAL IN ORDER TO SURVIVE. • IT IS A TWO WAY PROCESS. • IT IS UTMOST NECESSARY TO GIVE AND RECEIVE TRUST IN ORDER TO SUCCECEED. • WITHOUT TRUST ACHIEVING ANY THING IS IMPOSSIBLE.
WHY WE TRUST • WE WANT TO TRUST BECAUSE IT IS FAR EASIER,LESS DEMANDINGA ND OFFERS MORE POSSIBILITIES THAN CHRONIC SUSPICION. • WITHOUT TRUST WE CANNOT ENDURE THE COMPLEXITY OF THE WORLD.
WHY WE TRUST • WITH TRUST ,LIFE BECOMES MUCH SIMPLER,WITH TRUST WE CAN DEVOTE OUR ATTENTION TO A MUCH BRODER RANGE OF ACTIVITIES THAN WOULD BE POSSIBLE IN THE ENVIRONMENT OF SUSPICION.
TRUST DERIVED FROM A GERMAN WORD ‘TROST’,WHICH SUGGEST COMFORT. WE TRUST THOSE WHO DEMONSTRATE THEY ARE WORTHY OF IT. DEFINITION BELIEF THAT THOSE ON WHOM WE DEPEND WILL MEET OUR EXPECTATIONS.
`WE TRUST THOSE WHO MEET OUR POSITIVE EXPECTATIONS.` `WHEN WE TRUST OTHERS ,WE ASSUME THAT THEY WILL BEHAVE IN A MANNER CONSISITENT WITH OUR INTERESTS AS FAR AS POSSILE.` `WE BELIEVE THAT THOSE WE TRUST ARE BOTH WILLING AND ABLE TO MEET OUR NEEDS.`
`WE EVALUATE PEOPLES TRUSTWORTHYNESS IN RELATION TO WHAT WE EXPECT OF THEM.` BUILD A TRUSTING RELATIONSHIP `IT IS UTMOST ESSENTIAL THAT WE UNDERSTAND OTHER’S EXPECTATIONS.` `TRUST BUILDS WHEN PEOPLE FOLLOW THROUGH ON CLEARLY SPECIFIED COMMITMENTS.`
EXPECTATIONS • EXPLICIT: LEADS TO COMMITMENT RESULTING IN BUILDING TRUST. IMPLICIT ( BACKGROUND) `EXPECTATIONS THAT ARE TAKEN FOR GRANTED ARE THE ONES THAT MIGHT LEAD TO MISTRUST.` `ORGANISATIONS USUALLY SUFFER FROM THE ABOVE SYNDROME.`
IT IS NOT THAT SIMPLY KNOWING AND FULFILLING EXPECTATIONS SUSTAINS TRUST, • MALEVOLENCE AND INCOMPETANCE,EVEN WHEN THEY ARE EXPECTED OR ANTICIPATED,WILL THOROUGHLY UNDERMINE TRUST. • `IT IS INCONSISITENCY BETWEEN WHAT ONE EXPECTS AND WHAT ONE OBSERVES RAISES DOUBTS ABOUT THE MOTIVES OR ABILITIES OF THOSE IN WHOM WE PLACE OUR TRUST.`
VULNERABILITY • AS WE GIVE TRUST,WE BECOME VULNARABLE,WE DEPEND ON OTHERS AND RELY ON THEM TO FULFILL EXPECTATIONS. • TRUST FADES AND TURNS IN TO DISTRUST WHEN THOSE ON WHOM WE RELY FAIL TO MEET OUR EXPECTATIONS.
TRUST CANNOT GROW UNLESS WE TAKE RISKS THAT MAY RESULT IN DISTRUST. • `SINCE INTERSTS OF PEOPLE AND CAPABILITIES DIFFER,TRUST BECOMES MORE PROBLEMATIC. • WITHOUT RISKS THERE IS NO NEED FOR TRUST. • TRUST & RISK GO TOGETHER.
TO TRUST OR NOT • DEGREE OF FEAR VARIES WITH EACH INDIVIDUAL. • THERE IS EITHER TRUST OR NO TRUST,NOTHING IN BETWEEN. • EACH OF US HAS OUR OWN LIMITS OF TRUST,AND ONCE IT IS VIOLATED,WE BECOME DISTRUSTFUL.
“OUR TRUST WILL BEGIN TO ERODE IF A BUISNESS COLLEAQUE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND AND UTILISE HIS ABILITY TO OUR TRUST WILL BEGIN TO ERODE IF A BUISNESS COLLEAQUE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND AND UTILISE HIS ABILITY TO FORM A TASK THAT IS IMPORTANT TO THE BUISNESS.”
TRUST THRESHOLD • A TRUST THRESHOLD HEPLS PROTECT US FROM THE UNTRUSTWORTHY. • WITHOUT SOME POINT AT WHICH WE WITHDRAW OUR TRUST,WE EXPOSE OURSELVES TO RISKS THAT COULD HARM US AS AN INDIVIDUAL OR THE GROUP WE BELONG TO.
TRUST THRESHOLD EASY “TRUST- DIFFICULT TO REGAIN ONCE LOST” “EACH INDIVIDUAL ,TEAM AND ORGANISATION HAS A POINT AT WHICH IT WILL WITHDRAW ITS TRUST OF OTHERS” TRUST THRESHOLD TRUST DIFFICULT DISTRUST
THRESH HOLD ESABLISHMENT • THE SITUATION: DEPENDING ON THE RISK INVOLVED,SOME SITUATIONS REQUIRE A HIGHER OR LOWER THRESHOLD OF TRUST. • THOSE GIVING THEIR TRUST: BASED ON THEIR OWN HISTORY AND TEMPARAMENT, INDIVIDUALS,TEAMS AND ORGANISATIONS ARE INCLINED TO ESTABLISH HIGHER OR LOWER TRUST THRESHOLDS. • THOSE ASKING TO BE TRUSTED. DEPENDING ON THE PERCEIVED CREDIBILITY OF THOSE WE ARE CONSIDERING TRUSTING,WE MAY RAISE OR LOWER THE TRUST THRESHOLD WE USE.
DEGREE OF TRUST • HOW MUCH DO WE TRUST OTHERS IN GENERAL? • WHOM DO WE TRUST IN SPECIFIC SITUATIONS? • ASSESS THE DEGREE TO WHICH WE TRUST OTHERS • DEGREE TO WHICH OUR TEAM AND ORGANISATION IS WILLING TO TRUST OTHERS IN THE PURSUIT OF BUISNESS OBJECTIVES. ANSWERS
RADIUS OF TRUST • SUPPLIERS • PARTNERS • ALLIANCES DISTRUST OF THOSE OUTSIDE THE ORGANISATION • RESTRICTED TRUST RADIUS • THOSE IN SAME GROUP • THOSE IN OTHER GROUPS • SENIOR LEADERSHIPS DISTRUST OF OTHER ORGANISATIONAL MEMBERS • CLOSE COLLEAQUES • IMMEDIATE WORK TEAM TRUST OF FELLOW TEAM MEMBERS TRUST OF SELF
RADIUS OF TRUST • SUPPLIERS • PARTNERS • ALLIANCES • EXPANSIVE TRUST RADIUS TRUST OF THOSE OUTSIDE THE ORGANISATION • THOSE IN SAME GROUP • THOSE IN OTHER GROUPS • SENIOR LEADERSHIPS TRUST OF OTHER ORGANISATIONAL MEMBERS • CLOSE COLLEAQUES • IMMEDIATE WORK TEAM TRUST OF FELLOW TEAM MEMBERS TRUST OF SELF
EXPANDING THE RADIUS OF TRUST IN ORGANISATIONS. • WHAT ACTIONS CAN LEADERS TAKE TO CREATE THE TRUST NEEDED IN RAPIDLY CHANGING MARKET PLACE? • IN ORDER TO BUILD HIGH PERFORMANCE CORPORATIONS,WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE KEY LEVERAGE POINTS THAT GIVES RISE TO TRUST. • WHAT ARE THE FACTORS THAT MUST BE EXHIBHITED & PRACTICED FOR GAINING HIGH LEVEL OF TRUST?
FOUNDATION OF TRUST THREE BASIC IMPERATIVES. • ACHIEVING RESULTS • ACTING WITH INTEGRITY • DEMONSTARTING CONCERN “THESE FACTORS MUST BE EXHIBHITED AND PRACTICED CONSISITENTLY”
ACHIEVING RESULTS • TRUST = ACTION + RESULTS • INVOLVES PEOPLES PERFORMANCE IN FULFILLING OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS. • IF PEOPLE CANNOT DELIVER THEN WE FIND THEM UNWORTHY OF TRUST
FUTURE OF HP • BASIS OF TRUST WILL BE ON COMPETANCE AND ABILITY TO PRODUCE RESULTS.
ACTING WITH INTEGRITY • INTEGRITY IS ADHERENCE TO A CODE OF ETHICS OR SET OF VALUES • IT IS A MEASURE OF COHERANCE AND CONSISITENCY. • WE TRUST THOSE WHO ARE HONEST IN WHAT THEY SAY AND CONSISITENT IN HOW THEY ACT.
DEMONSTARTING CONCERN CONCERN FOR OTHERS:WE TRUST • WHO CARE ABOUT US • WHO UNDERSTAND OUR CONCERNS • WHO ARE NOT IN CONFLICT WITH OUR INTERESTS.
CONCERN FOR OTHERS • GOES BEYOND INDIVIDUALS • IT IS ABROADER CONCERN FOR THE GROUPS OF WHICH WE ARE A PART. • PEOPLE IN POSITON OF LEADERSHIP AND AUTHORITY,IF THEY HAVE CONCERN, THEY WILL BENEFIT THE COMPANY. • IF NOT THEN THEY HAVE A SERIOUS IMPACT ON INDIVIDUALS AND THE ORGANISATION.
BALANCING ACT • AS LEADERS IN ORDER TO FULFILL RESPONSIBILITIES,WE HAVE TO ACT COMPETANTLY.IN DOING THAT WE MAY VIOLATE THE NEED FOR DEMONSTRATING CONCERN. • HOW WELL YOU DO THAT IS ALWAYS PERCEIVED BY THOSE AFFECTED.
BALANCING ACT • LEADERS WHO ACHIEVE RESULTS BUT WHO DO SO IN A WAY THAT LACKS INTEGRITY WILL NOT BE TRUSTED-EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE DELIVERED THE RESULTS EXPECTED OF THEM
BALANCING ACT • LEADERS CAN SOMETIMES OVERCOME THE PERCEPTIONS OF INCONSISITENCY IN THEIR ACTIONS IF THEY DELIVER RESULTS AND DEMONSTRATE CONCERN FOR PEOPLE.
MONITORING TRUST • WE CONSTANTLY ASSES AND REASSES THE TRUSTWORTHYNESS OF PEOPLE AND MANAGE THE RISK. • THIS WAY WE BALANCE THE NEED TO SIMPLIFY A COMPLEX WORLD AND BUILD SUPPORTIVE RELATIONSHIPS THROUGH TRUST. • THOSE IN LEADERSHIP POSITIONS NEED BOTH TO TRUST OTHERS AND TO ENSURE THAT SUCH TRUST IS WARRENTED.
TRUSTWORTHYNESS • OUR ASSESMENT OF ANOTHER’S TRUSTWORTHYNESS DEPENDS ON • ACHIEVING RESULTS • ACTING WITH INTEGRITY & • DEMONSTRATING CONCERN
ACHIEVING AND SUSTAINING TRUST LEVEL OF TRUST DEMONSTRATING CONCERN + + = ACHIEVING RESULTS ACTING WITH INTEGRITY
THREE IMPERATIVES DETERMINE WHY SOME ORGANISATIONS DEVELOP APPROPRIATE LEVELS OF TRUST WHILE OTHERS FIND THEMSELVES BEING TOO RESTRICTED OR TOO VULNERABLE.