1 / 21

Workers’ Compensation: An Introduction

Workers’ Compensation: An Introduction. Tee L. Guidotti George Washington University Medical Center. is nation’s first social insurance scheme a state responsibility, organized by state a compromise mostly for industrial workers funded by employers through premiums. is not

leroy
Download Presentation

Workers’ Compensation: An Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Workers’ Compensation: An Introduction Tee L. Guidotti George Washington University Medical Center

  2. is nation’s first social insurance scheme a state responsibility, organized by state a compromise mostly for industrial workers funded by employers through premiums is not a welfare scheme or entitlement program a federal government responsibility a single plan required for very small employers tax supported Workers’ Compensation

  3. What existed before WC? • Crisis during the Industrial Revolution • Injured workers had to sue employer • Courts deliberately tried to protect employers in interest of increasing employment, wages • Legal defenses for employers insurmountable: • “assumption of risk” = worker voluntarily accepts risk of a dangerous job • “fellow servant doctrine” = employer is not responsible if injury due to action of another employee • “contributory negligence” = if any action by injured worker can be construed to have contributed to risk

  4. What forced the change? • Skyrocketing injury rates created social, political problems • Labor unions started using this as an organizing issue • As economy settled down, courts became more open to worker-initiated lawsuits • Muckraking (e.g. The Jungle) • Political climate changed: Progressive movement • Model available: Germany, UK

  5. The WC “Compromise” • Workers would reliably receive care and benefits • Medical care • Lost wages • Employers would be shielded from litigation • No fault • No additional liability, even for negligence • Administration would be fair and efficient • Insurance model (actuarial rating, costs passed to consumers/employers) • Intended to allow employers to anticipate costs • Rapid, no-fault processing of claims • Exclusive remedy: no appeal outside system, no alternative system

  6. Early days of EC • Huge wave of state legislation from 1911 to 1915 • States set up Industrial Accident Commissions • Coverage mandatory (except TX) • Early attention to injury prevention • Few permitted enhanced benefits • However, every state different

  7. Services provided by WC Universal: • Medical services for injured workers • Income replacement • Temporary disability • Permanent disability • Survivor benefits (if fatality) Variable: • Rehabilitation • Retraining

  8. Usual coverage Employees of firms with more than a few employees Covered under special systems: Maritime workers Railroad workers Federal employees Usually not covered Agricultural workers Self-employed Business owners Domestic workers Volunteers Who is covered?

  9. Permanent disability benefits • Two-thirds of WC disability benefits • Wide variation in adjudication, criteria • Ratings are based on: • Impairment assessment (medically discernable injury) • Actual wage loss • Permanent loss of earnings potential (considering job market) • Scheduled awards for specific impairments are trend (since NJ 1911) • Covers future wage loss • Unjust for injured workers to forgo benefits even if little wage loss at the time

  10. How permanent disability is rated Three basic approaches • Impairment model • Based on schedules • Based on guidelines (e.g. AMA Guides) • Wage-loss formula Calculates actual loss of wages due to injury • Loss of earnings capacity Loss of future wages based on actuarial model

  11. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment • Like any tool, needs to be used properly • Not a cookbook: often gives a range • Achieves some consistency • Face validity in terms of relative impairment within functional systems • Expert consensus

  12. Downside to the AMA Guides • No objective validation • Often used indiscriminately as a formula for disability • Avoids many important types of disability: • Chronic pain • Mental changes, depression • Reversible conditions, such as airways reactivity • Dermatitis • Stress-related disorders (e.g. irritable colon) • Has become a self-perpetuating industry involving complicated revisions, guides to the Guides, training programs and even a certification scheme

  13. Financial realities of WC • Carriers go into but mostly out of business • Six states have exclusive funds • Employers pay insurance premiums • Premiums are based on: • Industry group • Size of enterprise • Historical claims experience (“rating”) • Administrative expenses are very high (up to 30 to 40% of premiums) • Industry concentrated in a few big carriers • Liberty Mutual, CAN, Fireman’s Fund, The Hartford, Travelers are the biggest

  14. Financial realities: Special cases • Single payer: ND, OH, WA, WV, WY and Canadian provinces • State insurance pools (24 states) • intended for “residual market” at high risk • expensive for employers • Self insurance ( • allowed in 47 states, not ND, WY • company pays out, usually sets up fund • only an option for big companies

  15. Financial realities of WC: benefits • Benefits from WC tend to be low • Some states cap as a % of average wage in state, typically 2/3 • Some states index to wages • Only considers wages, not additional direct costs or social costs • Costs are shifted from WC to supplemental Social Security and other programs • Limbo between denied WC claims and rejected LTD claims – injured worker caught in middle • Market forces reductions in benefits to reduce costs: • Reduced dollar benefits • Reduced acceptance rate for claims • Reduced impairment ratings • Choice of rating system • Choice of medical examiner

  16. Occupational disease • Underreported • Underrepresented in claims • Latency period • Often arises during retirement • Difficult to attribute to responsible employer • May be multi-factoral • Requirement for “objective finding” • Bad or lacking information • Missing data • Incomplete differential diagnosis • Inadequate exposure history • Irrelevant data

  17. Sociology of WC • Deeply rooted distrust • Of workers • Of employers • Of carriers • Abuse of system • By injured workers • By malingering workers • By employers • By carriers • Fear of consequences of filing a claim • Emphasis on “moral hazard”

  18. Sociology of injured workers • Filing claim may bring stimatizaiton • Esp. if injury is not obvious • Esp. if embarrassing to employer • Esp. if highly visible to other workers • PD or prolonged rehabilitation • Wearing on family • Coworkers often turn unsympathetic, even hostile • Neighbors, friends get tired, even suspicious of abuse • Injured worker gets depressed • Depressed people are difficult to be around • Intimations of fraud, exaggeration, abuse • Involutional cycle

  19. Role of physician • Who picks: the right of choice of physician: • Worker (half of states and DC) • Usually family physician • Employer or insurer (half of states, inc. VA) • Often on list of approved providers • Has given rise to PPO, other managed care models • Control over medical records is lost by worker

  20. Federal and Special Programs • Federal workers • Federal Employees Compensation Act • DoE Office of Compensation Programs • nuclear workers (radiation exposed) • nuclear workers (chemical exposure) • Federally administered • Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act • Federal Black Lung Program

  21. Occupations not covered by workers’ compensation These workers have programs that cover disability whether work-related or not; worker retains access to tort litigation • US Merchant Marine • Railroad workers in interstate commerce

More Related