380 likes | 492 Views
Public Accountability-Part II. Best Practices Occupational Licensing Model. Presented by Jim Zukowski, Director Professional Licensing & Certification Division Texas Department of Health. Model Developed by the Texas Sunset Advisory Commission. Model.
E N D
Public Accountability-Part II Best Practices Occupational Licensing Model Presented by Jim Zukowski, Director Professional Licensing & Certification Division Texas Department of Health Presented at CLEAR’s 2003 Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September 11-13
Model • Developed by the Texas Sunset Advisory Commission Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Model • Helpful in evaluating occupational licensing programs. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Covers every aspect of an occupational licensing agency ranging from Model Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
the need for the agency to how licensing and enforcement should operate. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Based on common standards that the Sunset Commission Model Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
staff have observed over 25 years of evaluations. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Model • Also delivers a detailed explanation for each of the standards so that criteria to measure Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
whether the program meets the standard can be developed. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Example - Inspections Standard “ The Agency should have clear procedures, rules, Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
and statutory authority for conducting inspections”. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Example - Inspections The explanation section lays out what policies one would expect the agency to have Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
that define the records, facilities and other matters subject to the inspection. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Model • Then provide additional information on the use of announced vs unannounced Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
inspections, risk-based scheduling, and the processes in place to follow- up on compliance issues. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Model • Was developed as a guide for sunset staff but has applicability to any state regulatory agency Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Some verbage is strictly “Sunset” language, For example ATB is used in several sections. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Model • A T B means “across the board” and if the phrase A T B recommendation is used, it means that the recommendation Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
would apply to all agencies going through the sunset review process. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Model Broad categories for the model include the following: Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Need for Agency • Overall Structure • Policy Body Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Administration • Licensing, and • Enforcement Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Model The major thrust of the model is in the areas of licensing and enforcement. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Some examples: Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Area:Licensing Subject:General qualifications Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Standards: Qualifications for licensure should be easily determined, clear, Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
represent a current condition, and relate to the practice of the profession. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Area:Enforcement Subject:Compliance Investigations Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Standards: In general, board members should not be involved in both the investigation of complaints and Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
determining disciplinary action. Ideally, investigation of complaints and setting a Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
complaint for hearing should be a staff function. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Standards: If board members are involved in the investigation, they should not Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
take part in the disciplinary proceedings. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
The completion of these standard practices provides a structure for occupational licensing agencies Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
to see if they are efficient, effective, fair and accountable in their mission to protect the public. Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
The Model is available on line at: www.sunset.state.tx.us/sunset Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003
Questions??? Presented at CLEAR’s 23rd Annual Conference Toronto, Ontario September, 2003