100 likes | 214 Views
Caution: Large-Scale Projects at Work. Columbia University Libraries: Butler Library’s Media Center and Digital Humanities Center Bethany Edwards LIS 698-01: Practicum Dean Giannini. 1) Kim’s Video DVD donation 2) Reference Desk 3) Digital Humanities Center.
E N D
Caution: Large-Scale Projects at Work Columbia University Libraries: Butler Library’s Media Center and Digital Humanities Center Bethany Edwards LIS 698-01: Practicum Dean Giannini
1) Kim’s Video DVD donation • 2) Reference Desk • 3) Digital Humanities Center Interning at Butler Library
Cataloging system: Voyager • Fairly straightforward copy cataloging • Some foreign films required some detective skills • Russian characters for “English subtitles” Kim’s Video DVD’s
Sunday afternoons • “This is due on Monday.” • Advanced research questions • Lots of questions about technology and the library’s online tools. • CLIO • Subject Guides • Printer Privileges? The Reference Desk
Official Practicum Project • Bob Scott, Director • DHC is in conversation with Digital Science Center and Digital Social Science Center • Planned future expansion Digital Humanities Center
DSC and DSSC have been renovated in the past few years • DHC has been told they will get a renovation and an additional space • Assessment of current DHC is planned before renovation/expansion—data driven improvements • Issues: Delays, no assessment librarian DHC: “New in 2012”
Literature review • Open questions about use of space will be included in faculty focus group sessions • Unique nature of the space presents challenges DHC: New Space
Focus on faculty: Database • Focus on process: Best practices in conducting focus groups in libraries • Focus on action: Questions, notices, meetings • Focus on the future: Work in progress DHC: Focus Groups
Filemaker Pro • RefWorks • Google docs • Familiarity with DHC’s tools • ABBYY Fine Reader • Adobe Suite • Nvivo 9 • Arc, Google Earth • SPSS Digital Tools
Based on previous assessment results, DHC is on the right track in terms of gathering and interpreting data. • Staff associated with DHC are very enthusiastic • Lack of an assessment librarian (or someone in a similar role) made the smallest steps more difficult • “Intern” status has prevented useful interaction with the IRB • Why hasn’t focus group happened yet? • Faculty seem to respect the DHC and digital scholarship • Main barrier is time and resources • DHC director , steering committee, and faculty selected for focus groups have limited time Findings