220 likes | 228 Views
This report discusses the downgrade scenarios in email address internationalization (EAI) and the issues related to POP3 implementation. It includes an introduction, scenarios, mailing list functions, POP3 service design, and key issues encountered during testing.
E N D
IETF 66 EAI WGTesting Report TWNIC snw@twnic.net.tw
Outline • Introduction • Downgrade • Scenarios • Mailing List • POP3 • Issue
Introduction • Base on sendmail • Sendmail complier with Milter (8.13.6) • Mimedefang for address/header rewrite (2.56) • Most coding by perl (string process) in Mimedefang • Trial System • eai1.twnic.tw EAI SMTP (RH9.0, pam + mysql) • eai2.twnic.tw EAI SMTP (RH7.3, pam + mysql) • downgrade.twnic.tw Original Sendmail version • Test by using ‘telnet’ command
eai2 Architecture Envelope From/To & Header downgrade Envelope To possible upgrade by eai1 to transfer punycode local part to UTF8 eai1 downgrade.twnic.tw 台網中心.tw (xn--fiq43lrrlz83a.tw) twnic.net.tw (All domain are same server) Only downgrade Trace Field
Reference • draft-ietf-eai-framework-00.txt • draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-00.txt • draft-ietf-eai-scenarios-01.txt • draft-ietf-eai-smtpext-00.txt • draft-ietf-eai-mailinglist-00.txt • draft-ietf-eai-pop-00.txt • draft-ietf-eai-downgrade-01.txt
Downgrade -Envelope • Downgrade (eai1 to downgrade) • Sender EAI-aware to Destination not EAI-aware • Downgrade Envelope From/To • MAIL FROM: <UTF8@UTF8> EAI-Parameter=ATOMIC • RCPT TO: <UTF8@UTF8> EAI-Parameter=ALT-ADDRESS • ATOMIC: UTF8@UTF8 iesg--PUNYCODE@IDN (xn--) • ALD-ADDRESS: to replace address by ALT-ADDRESS
Downgrade -Header • 8bit Header (UTF8) SHOULD downgrade with MIME • UTF-8 information MUST NOTappear in Received fields • Trace Field (Received) ‘for’ clauses downgraded with punycode • Add Header: I-EMAIL: 1.0;downgraded by EHLO (PTR [IP])
Downgrade -Sample (eai1 to downgraade)- SMTP negotiation (telnet from eai2 to eai1)
Mailing List • Base on sendmail mailing list function • Format maximum 3 columns • Email • EAI-Parameter with ‘{‘ ‘}’ • Comments with ‘(‘ ‘)’ in 2822
Scenarios • A, B and C are i18mail users • X,Y and Z are original ascii user • L is i18n-aware • LA is non-i18n-aware • S is Sent success • R is Reply Success • Linux ‘mail’ command for EAI to reply • Outlook Express for non-EAI to reply
Scenario for Draft in TWNIC EAI trial – From non-EAI (downgraded)
Other Scenarios • A to B , relay by non-EAI MTA • eai1 ->downgrade -> eai2 • Once downgrade , all downgrade • X to Y , relay by EAI MTA • downgrade -> eai1 -> downgrade
EAI POP3 • TWNIC design a simple i18n-aware POP3 service • The POP3 service was developed with PERL language • Our key point • ‘CAPA’ responses ‘UTF8’ , the MUA can login with UTF8 or punycode (also implement MIME, but we think it is better using punycode). Different encoding map to the same mailbox • ‘CAPA’ don’t response ‘UTF8’ , login as punycode, and MDA store mail as punycode mailbox name
Issue 1 • May addr-spec change ? Should we have to use ESMTP argument (such as eai-parameter) ? • Make sense MSG from/to regards as envelope from/to between both EAI MTA • Easy to implement in mailing list and parser, not confused in other symbols (‘,’ ‘:’ ‘#’ ‘;’ ‘|’ ‘&’…) • Some MUA (Outlook) can input and keep ‘{‘ ‘}’ information in address book, and transmit ‘<addr {eai-parameter}>’ it to MTA, if EAI MTA is known • When relaying, POSSIBLE ESMTP arguments (Ex: SIZE,AUTH,NOTIFY ) do not pass to next relay EAI MTA, cause EAI-Parameter MAYBE lose the argument. • Broken the addr-spec is not a good idea • Any opinion or method is welcome, we need more comment for our trail
Issue 2 • Recommend: alt-separator for mailing list is same to ‘utf8header’ • List-* MAY appear alt-separator before REQUEST-URI (Query String) • List-Id: “Testing \(TWNIC EAI TESTBED\) ” <中文@台網中心.tw> • Can be null • List-Subscribe: <mailto:中文@台網中心.tw{atomic}?subject=subscribe> • Using in List-* and URI ‘mailto’
Issue 3 • EAI-Parameter replaces Envelope From, and some consideration • Alt-address can be assign to another domain name that is different host from original mail address? • EAI need more detail describe conflicts with other extensions (DSN/MDN/AUTH…etc) and services • EAI need to take care SPAM issue under ALT-ADDRESS
Issue 4 • SPF will check Sender from MTA, EAI-parameter is possible confused • Is EAI-parameter restricted to MTA domain ? • If not restrict, we don’t know how to setup SPF
Issue 5 • Issue in DKIM • EAI is possible to change Envelope From/To and Message From/To, this action causes ‘h=‘ clause verify failure • EAI-Downgraded-From/EAI-Downgraded-To (or other downgrade header) is in need for DKIM • Whether downgrade header or not, when transmits to destination MTA via MSP, DKIM can’t sign before this • Some small issue in ‘c=relaxed/simple’ when downgrade causes folding/non-folding