1 / 19

Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth

Explore how natural resources like fish and oil impact economic growth in Norway & Iceland, highlighting risks and benefits.

levelyn
Download Presentation

Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth Some Lessons from Norway and Iceland Thorvaldur Gylfason

  2. Natural Resources: A Mixed Blessing? • Consensus on foreign aid and assistance • It is good for growth if accompanied by sound economic policies • Guiding principle in IMF and World Bank dealings with member countries • Seems also to apply to natural resource abundance • Natural resources are good for growth if accompanied by sound economic policies

  3. Why worry?What can go wrong? • Too much emphasis on natural resources • May be at the expense of human resources • Education may suffer • May draw resources available for investment away from other sectors • Domestic and foreign investment may suffer • May result in Dutch disease, resulting in overvaluation of the currency, thus hurting profitability in and exports from other sectors • Total exports may suffer

  4. So what? • Education, investment, and exports are almost surely good for growth • Rent seeking, often associated with natural resources, may hurt growth • So, if natural resource abundance hurts education, investment, and exports and encourages rent seeking, … • … then it may reduce economic growth in the long run

  5. Natural wealth and economic growth National economic output D F E C A natural resource boom makes a country better off at least for a while, but if it reduces growth, then, after a time, the country will be worse off than it would have been without the boom, other things being equal. B A Time

  6. Empirical evidence: Education Same applies to primary and tertiary education A 3 percentage point increase in the share of natural capital in national wealth goes along with a 2 percentage point decrease in secondary-school enrolment from one country to another

  7. Empirical evidence: Domestic investment How about foreign investment? A 5 percentage point increase in the natural capital share goes along with a decrease in the domestic investment rate by 1 percentage point

  8. Foreign investment is export of capital. How about exports of goods and services? Empirical evidence: Foreign investment A 30 percentage point increase in the natural capital share goes along with a decrease in the foreign investment ratio by 1 percentage point

  9. Empirical evidence: Exports A 3 percentage point increase in the natural capital share goes along with a 1 percentage point decrease in the export ratio

  10. Empirical evidence: Rent seeking I How about corruption? A 4 percentage point increase in the natural capital share goes along with a 1 percentage point increase in the import tariff rate

  11. Empirical evidence: Rent seeking II So what does all this mean for growth? A 6 percentage point increase in the natural capital share goes along with a 1 percentage point decrease in the honesty index, which means more corruption

  12. Does this result hold for rich countries as well as poor? Empirical evidence: Growth I A 12 percentage point increase in the natural capital share goes along with a 1 percentage point decrease in the per capita growth rate from one country to another

  13. Rich countries: Same story, but slightly weaker relationship Empirical evidence: Growth II

  14. Poor countries: Same story, but stronger relationship Empirical evidence: Growth III

  15. Challenges for Norway and Iceland • Norway’s fish • Tiny fishing industry • Employs less than 1% of labor force • Contributes less than 1% to GDP • All the resource rent, at roughly 20-25% of the value of the catch, is allowed to dissipate • Inefficient, used to be heavily subsidized • Costly also in other respects • Perhaps the single greatest obstacle to Norway’s EU membership in 1972 and 1994

  16. Iceland’s Fish • Larger fishing industry than in Norway • Employs 11% of labor force • Account for 16% of GDP and 50% of exports • Rent from fisheries is approx. 5% of GNP • Permits (quotas) are given away for free • State gets nothing, even if the fish is a common property resource by law • Declared unconstitutional by Supreme Court • Arguments for fees, based on efficiency and equity • Education and health care in crisis

  17. Norway’s Oil • Large petroleum sector • Second largest oil exporter in the world • Contributes 9-10% to GNP • Oil wealth is estimated at 50-250% of GNP • State takes in about 80% of the oil rent • Mostly through taxes and fees • The oil is a common property resource by law • Oil revenue is deposited in oil fund • Invested in foreign securities • Will become huge in a few years if they can resist the temptation to use the money to meet current needs

  18. But Norway Needs to Be Careful • Many other oil-producing countries have serious economic problems • Iran: -1% growth of per capita GDP since 1965 • Venezuela: -2% • Saudi Arabia: -3% • Norway is one of the few resource-abundant countries that has consistently performed well • Iceland’s economic performance has been mixed

  19. Conclusion: What Iceland and Norway Need to Do • Sell oil drilling and fishing permits to domestic and foreign firms on a level playing field • OECD, IMF, and WTO recommend this • Use proceeds to improve the efficiency of tax collection • By lowering distortionary taxes (income tax, VAT) • In Iceland, also necessary to improve education and health care The End

More Related