310 likes | 512 Views
WHY TELL YOU ABOUT THIS?. Although a very particular service developed in response to local and specific demandsGeneral principles may be helpful to considerSomething to learn from cross-agency workingOptions for service design worth discussingWelcome ideas about evaluating service. SETTING THE
E N D
2. WHY TELL YOU ABOUT THIS? Although a very particular service developed in response to local and specific demands
General principles may be helpful to consider
Something to learn from cross-agency working
Options for service design worth discussing
Welcome ideas about evaluating service
3. SETTING THE SCENE Ghn started life as glasgow council for single homeless is a membership org for vol sector homeless providers.Ghn started life as glasgow council for single homeless is a membership org for vol sector homeless providers.
4. SETTING THE SCENE GLASGOWS HOMELESSNESS STRATEGY
Closure of large hostels
Diversion from hostels
Provision of new services and accommodation
Development of new joint assessments
Reduction in repeat homelessness
5. Improving the Standard of Accommodation From this
..
6. To this.
7. Principles behind Design of Homelessness Services Based on health needs assessment
Establish known gaps in service
Identify issues around access, and consider this in design of service
Work in partnership with other agencies
Services ACCESSIBLE, FLEXIBLE, RESPONSIVE to NEED
Re-shape services as needed
8. OBJECTIVES for HOMELESSNESS SERVICES Improve access to services for homeless people
Reduce inappropriate use of A/E
Improve management and resettlement for homeless people with complex needs
9. MENTAL HEALTH DELIVERY PLAN Principle of equality and social inclusion
Better management of long-term conditions, including PD
Avoid inappropriate admissions
Extracts from commitments and targets These are taken from the commitments and targets in the Scottish Execs mental health delivery planThese are taken from the commitments and targets in the Scottish Execs mental health delivery plan
10. Giving you this information to illustrate the extent of homelessness services, and how they have developed from a single dedicated CPN in the early 90s, to a complex system of services.
Start here with the primarily health based servicesGiving you this information to illustrate the extent of homelessness services, and how they have developed from a single dedicated CPN in the early 90s, to a complex system of services.
Start here with the primarily health based services
11. Integrated Homelessness Teams (Health and Social Work) Homeless Addiction Team
19 Health + 19 Social Work Staff (nursing, medical, OT, psychology) 1 Joint Team Leader
Currently supporting 629 homeless people with addictions.
Research on ARBD, assertive outreach model used and staged engagement.
Hostel Assessment & Resettlement Team
To carry out complex assessments on hostel residents to provide alternatives and associated care packages
Social Work / Housing and Health Staff (OT, CPN, Dietician)
Then on to integrated teams, established ahead of mainstream Comm Health Partnerships Then on to integrated teams, established ahead of mainstream Comm Health Partnerships
12. Integrated Homelessness Teams Assessment and Diversion Team
To assess presentations to homelessness and divert them away from hostel
into appropriate support services/ alternative accommodation
Social work/housing, health (CPN, OT, dietician)
13. New Developments in HomelessMental Health Service Since 2004 Discharge & Resettlement Team resettle people from hospital
prevent new homelessness
reduce in-pt days
6 Dedicated in-patient beds
Trauma Team
Personality Disorder Team
14. PERSONALITY DISORDER and HOMELESSNESS TEAM Followed from gap analysis
Significant no. of institutionally homeless people difficult to house, and needs not met by existing services
Many with history of complex trauma
Many thought to have PD, although this often not diagnosed
Many held by vol sector organisations
15. SERVICE MODEL Pragmatic choice; given circumstances
Room to develop and change
Learned from Edinburgh model
Bateman and Tyrer (2004)
-SOLE PRACTITIONER
-DIVIDED FUNCTIONS *
-SPECIALIST TEAMS EDINBURGH experience:
Audit of PD prevalence in homeless population Rough Sleepers funding,
Followed by 1 year COWGATE project, joint funded by health and housing assessment and consultation, looking at effects on sustainability of housing,
Then current service 1 clinical psychologist providing assessment/ consultation/ brief intervention/ training
SOLE PRACTITIONER: well-meaning individual; can benefit some mild disorders, but can impede recovery in more complex cases
DIVIDED FUNCTION: specialist therapists providing interventions, while community team manages case
SPECIALIST TEAM: more holistic team-based approach (involving other agencies e.g. probation, housing, social care) Includes management of the case for continuityEDINBURGH experience:
Audit of PD prevalence in homeless population Rough Sleepers funding,
Followed by 1 year COWGATE project, joint funded by health and housing assessment and consultation, looking at effects on sustainability of housing,
Then current service 1 clinical psychologist providing assessment/ consultation/ brief intervention/ training
SOLE PRACTITIONER: well-meaning individual; can benefit some mild disorders, but can impede recovery in more complex cases
DIVIDED FUNCTION: specialist therapists providing interventions, while community team manages case
SPECIALIST TEAM: more holistic team-based approach (involving other agencies e.g. probation, housing, social care) Includes management of the case for continuity
16. SERVICE MODEL Specific remit to work across all agencies in homeless partnership; HEALTH, HOUSING, SW, VOLUNTARY SECTOR
City wide
Aim to build capacity in existing services
1 consultant psychiatrist in psychotherapy
1 adult psychotherapist/ group analyst
17. MODEL COMPRISES: Assessment and psychodynamic formulation, followed by consultation
Consultation only patient not seen
Regular complex case discussion
Telephone advice/ liaison/ signposting
Training
Limited capacity for direct psychotherapy,
Individual and group
18. FIRST YEAR 56 Referrals,
31 Seen directly
15 Consultation only
6 Pending/ disappeared/ prison/ died
4 Redirected immediately
Continuing effort to raise profile of team
Significant pre-referral discussion
19. SOURCE OF REFERRALS Statutory Organisations 39 (70%)
22 of these from homeless services
20. SOURCE OF REFERRALS Voluntary Sector 17 (30%) Surprised by this low figure. Are often involved in the case, and attend meetings more readily, and feel supported by this have a higher degree of PRESENCE in our ongoing work. Also sometimes referrals made by mental health service workers in order to elicit our support/ input to team such as supported accommodation staff group/ to support a tenancy.Surprised by this low figure. Are often involved in the case, and attend meetings more readily, and feel supported by this have a higher degree of PRESENCE in our ongoing work. Also sometimes referrals made by mental health service workers in order to elicit our support/ input to team such as supported accommodation staff group/ to support a tenancy.
21. ASSESSMENTS 138 appointments
Attended 67 (49%)
DNA 38 (27%)
Cancelled 28 (20%)
Not specified 5 (4% )
Extra efforts required to track and engage patients
Frequent liaison with other services Dont have details of WHERE seen all over city ongoing struggle to identify rooms. Maintaining core of psychodynamic assessment out of a usual clinic setting.
Importance of our consistency in offering the time and place difficulty that people with no experience of consistency have in taking this up. We have put aside 50 mins can use however much of this you want/ able to.
Dont have details of WHERE seen all over city ongoing struggle to identify rooms. Maintaining core of psychodynamic assessment out of a usual clinic setting.
Importance of our consistency in offering the time and place difficulty that people with no experience of consistency have in taking this up. We have put aside 50 mins can use however much of this you want/ able to.
22. DIAGNOSIS Out of the 31 seen directly, plus few others with established diagnosis.
Set out to use IPDE only managed in 4 cases!!!Out of the 31 seen directly, plus few others with established diagnosis.
Set out to use IPDE only managed in 4 cases!!!
23. TYPES OF PD
24. CONSULTATION Number: 115
Efforts made to include all involved agencies
Model welcomed by vol sector agencies/ housing providers/ social work
Health agencies prefer taking the patient
Advantage in piggy-backing onto CPA or Vulnerable Adults procedures
25. ROUGH SEAS Finding language to formulate simply
Translating into practical advice
Getting multiple workers/ agencies to buy into model
Information sharing across agencies
Sheer effort of constituting meetings
Idea of own tenancy as a goal for
all
26. DIRECT TREATMENT Whether such a small service can provide direct treatment?
Model of 1x individual + 1x group
Mentalisation based focus
Would require good links with all those involved in care good case management
Would require reasonable degree of stability
27. TRAINING 1 Day Introduction to PD training
Constantly under review
Mixed groups vs tailored training to one organisation
Focus on boundaries
Attention to different learning styles
Move from theoretical to more interactive/ experiential
29. DRAFT I.C.P. for BPD There needs to be a generic training programme to promote EMPATHY, RESPECT and implementation of the principles of management for all staff
PRINCIPLES:
Establish alliance while managing risk
Maintain flexibility
Establish conditions to make pt safe
30. DRAFT I.C.P. Tolerate intense anger/ aggression/ hate
Promote reflection
Set necessary limits
Understand the dynamics and monitor relationship; reducing poss. splitting
Monitor C/Tr feelings
Use a consistent approach
31. HOW TO EVALUATE??? Main outcomes likely to be difficult to measure;
Reduced staff stress levels
Less staff turnover
Better maintenance of boundaries
Not doing harm
Very slow change in level of chaos e.g. tenancies held/ less A/E presentations