250 likes | 391 Views
WindBarriers - Project overview. Dorina Iuga European Wind Energy Association 21 October, Sofia. Agenda. Introduction to the project Short description of the methodology Project results Some recommendations Conclusions. Introduction to the project. WindBarriers objectives.
E N D
WindBarriers -Project overview Dorina Iuga European Wind Energy Association 21 October, Sofia
Agenda • Introduction to the project • Short description of the methodology • Project results • Some recommendations • Conclusions
WindBarriers objectives • IEE funded project (December 2008 – November 2010), • Obtain quantifiable data on: • Administrative barriers (building consent, etc), • Grid access barriers (lead time, capacity of grid infrastructure, etc), • Find best practices and reveal existing issues and bottlenecks, • Propose recommendations on how to overcome these barriers, • Raise awareness amongst decision-makers at local, regional, national and European level.
European political added value Supports the implementation of the : • 2009 Renewable Energy Directive, particularly Art. 13 and Art 16; • National Renewable Action Plans (NREAPs)
Project consortium Coordinator: EWEA - European Wind Energy Association • Fraunhofer - Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI • DWIA - Danish Wind Industry Association • AEE- Spanish Wind Energy Association • PSEW – Polish Wind Energy Association • MSZET - Hungarian Wind Energy Association • Dong Energy • Iberdrola • Austrian Wind Power Cooperation with: • National wind energy associations, • Project developers.
Methodology illustration 1 - Indicators 2 - Questionnaires 4 – EU-27 analysis & country overview 3 – National samples- 2008 online projects 5 – Recommendations
Desk-research results • Project website: www.windbarriers.eu, • List of references on administrative and grid access barriers at EU, national and regional level, • Research on perceived administrative and grid access barriers at EU and national level, • Indicators and 1 questionnaire (33 targeted questions) to collect concrete information enabling the analysis of administrative and grid access barriers.
Final results Publication (August 2010), containing: Analysis (both qualitative and quantitative) of the barriers Inter-comparison of countries, Recommendations for improving administrative and grid connection procedures in EU-27. Dissemination workshops : Poland Romania Hungary Denmark Spain
Recommendations for administrative procedures at EU level • Better EU average administrative lead time (2008: onshore: 42 months, offshore: 18 months), • Clear requirements for EIA’s, • Develop spatial planning, • Reduce the number of direct and indirect authorities to be contacted (now onshore: 9 direct and 9 indirect, offshore: 7 direct and 16 indirect)
Recommendations for administrative procedures at EU level • Implement “the one stop shop” approach in all Member States, • Improve transparency at EU level, • Set deadline for all procedures and improve the dissemination of information (developers and local authorities).
Recommendations for administrative procedures for Bulgaria • Provide project developers with clear rules on the EIA, • Implement spatial planning, • Improve the transparency of the decision-making process for obtaining the building consent,
Most frequent barriers to thegrid connection procedures at EU level
Recommendations for grid procedures at EU level • Improve the EU average for grid connection lead time (2008: onshore: 25.8 months, offshore: 14 months), • Lower the EU average for the grid connection time, • Set deadlines for grid processes (next stage), • Develop the grid infrastructure, • Reduce the number of number of involved ST & other parties : Onshore: 0.85 System operators (ST), 24 other parties (land users, technical questions etc), Offshore: 0.92 System operators (ST), 4.4 Other parties
Recommendations for grid procedures at EU level • Implement the “one-stop-shop” approach in all EU MS, • Set deadlines for the grid connection process, • Clarify and streamline the decision-making process.
Recommendations for grid procedures for Bulgaria • Realistic plan for the construction and extension of the grid ( too many demands compared to the current capacity of the grid), • Clarify the grid connection requirements, • Centralised decision-making process, • TSO and DSO to commit to completing grid upgrades as scheduled;
Recommendations for grid procedures for Bulgaria • Avoid discrimination against those developers not directly linked to electrical companies through ownership unbundling between electricity generation, transport and distribution.
Conclusions • Motivation - sell the good idea • Good legislation • Political support/Motivating support schemes • Adequate grid infrastructure "If you want to build a ship, don't drum up the people to gather wood, divide the work, and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea." - Antoine De Saint-Exupery
www.windbarriers.eu Thank you for your attention Dorina Iuga European Wind Energy Association diu@ewea.org +32 2 213 18 09 Sharon Wokke European Wind Energy Association swo@ewea.org +32 2 213 18 39