1 / 22

Document Analysis

Document Analysis. Document analysis. Write the following: A guy is driving around the back woods of Montana and he sees a sign in front of a broken down shanty-style house: ‘Talking Dog For Sale.’ He rings the bell and the owner appears and tells him the dog is in the backyard.

lexine
Download Presentation

Document Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Document Analysis

  2. Document analysis Write the following: • A guy is driving around the back woods of Montana and he sees a sign in front of a broken down shanty-style house: ‘Talking Dog For Sale.’ He rings the bell and the owner appears and tells him the dog is in the backyard. • The Lab looks up and says, ‘Well, I discovered that I could talk when I was pretty young. I wanted to help the government, so I told the CIA. • In no time at all they had me jetting from country to country, sitting in rooms with spies and world leaders, because no one figured a dog would be eavesdropping.’

  3. Document Analysis • The examination of questioned documents with known material for a variety of purposes; such as authenticity, alterations, erasures, obliterations.

  4. History • One of the first important uses was in the case of the kidnapping and murder of Charles Lindbergh’s young son (1927). • 1999: officially accepted as uniquely identifying by the US Court of Appeals

  5. I. Document Examiner • Role of the document examiner • Identifies efforts to obscure or alter original contents of writings/typewritten material • May recover original contents of writings or typewritten material • Evaluates authenticity of questioned documents

  6. I. Document Examiner cont’d B. Questioned document • Any object that contains handwritten or typewritten markings whose source or authenticity is in doubt • Examples: letters, checks, contracts, wills C. Collect Known Writings (Exemplars) • Uniqueness of handwriting makes this type of physical evidence almost like a fingerprint; a definitive physical characteristic

  7. II. Handwriting comparisons A. General Style • Education guides early handwriting development. In the US, two major styles taught: 1. Palmer method (1880)

  8. II. Handwriting comparisons cont’d 2. Zaner-Bloser method (1885)

  9. II. Handwriting comparisons cont’d B. Variations in handwriting • Combination of mechanical, physical, and mental functions • no single characteristic can be the basis of a positive comparison

  10. Forgery of Abraham Lincoln Letter

  11. II. Handwriting comparisons cont’d C. Major categories of handwriting analysis • Letter form • Line form • Formatting

  12. 12 Points of Comparison • Line quality • Spacing of words and letters • Relative height, width, and size of letters • Pen lifts, separations • Connecting strokes • Beginning and ending strokes • Unusual letter formation • Shading or pen pressure • Slant of letters • Baseline habits • Flourishes or embellishments • Placement of diacritics

  13. II. Handwriting comparisons cont’d D. Collection of exemplars 1. Known writings should be as similar as possible to the questioned document. a. writing implement, paper or other b. similar words and letter combinations c. enough exemplars to establish natural variations d. age of exemplars (+/- 2 years)

  14. II. Handwriting comparisons cont’d 2. Minimize deception • Require several pages of writing (dictation) • Content similar to questioned document • Use same writing implement and medium 3. Physical evidence • Handwriting specimens are considered physical evidence; not protected by 5th amendment • Taking handwriting samples does not violate 4th amendment

  15. III. Paper and Ink comparisons A. Compare Ink • “Tagged” ink (rare Earth Metals) • Analyzed by Microspectrophotometer, Chromatography: TLC, HPLC • Since 1970 • Ink dating (since 1968; accurate to within 6 months) • Dye ratio

  16. III. Paper and Ink comparisons B. Compare paper • Fiber identification: characterization of additives, fillers, and pigments • Characterization: appearance, color, weight, watermarks

  17. IV. Typewritten Comparisons A. Photocopier, Fax, Printer; Type-writers 1. Photocopiers • Transitory patterns 2. Fax machines • Header called TTI (transmitting terminal identifier); 3. Computer Printer • Printer model technology determination and ink type are most important • Categorized as impact (thermal dot-matrix) and non-impact (laser, ink-jet) application of toner 4. Type-writers

  18. V. Alterations, Erasures, Obliterations A. Alterations • Erasure is most common (rubber eraser, sand paper) • razor blade, knife • In all cases, upper fibers of paper are disturbed (apparent under microscope)

  19. V. Alterations, Erasures, Obliterations B. Obliterations • Use of chemicals most common (bleach, or other strong oxidizing agents) • Writings can be recovered by use of microscope or UV light

  20. V. Alterations, Erasures, Obliterations • IR luminescence can show different inks or residue remaining after erasure

  21. VI. Technology Biometric pad Computerized analysis (FISH) Forensic Information System for Handwriting

More Related