120 likes | 132 Views
Learn about Minnesota's approach to integrating Medicare and Medicaid programs for dual eligible individuals, including aligned financial incentives, improved care coordination, simplified paperwork, and addressing distinct population issues. Discover the challenges faced and future plans for better care delivery.
E N D
Minnesota’s Approach: Integrated Medicare & Medicaid ProgramsAlliance for Health ReformBriefing on Dual EligiblesJune 3, 2011 Scott Leitz Assistant Commissioner for Health Care Minnesota Department of Human Services
MN’s Dually Eligible Population • 106,600 Minnesotans are fully eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid • 97% of seniors and 50% of people with disabilities on Medicaid are dually eligible • About 40% of MN’s total Medicaid spending is for duals • 68% of seniors and 41% of people with disabilities in MN Medicaid receive long-term care services • Most seniors served through managed care • Minnesota SeniorCare Plus (MSC+) • Minnesota Senior Health Options (MSHO): SNP program, voluntary alternative to MSC+ • Most people with disabilities served through FFS • Special Needs BasicCare (SNBC): SNP program, voluntary alternative to FFS
Key Service Needs of Duals • Aligned financial incentives between payers (Medicare and Medicaid) and providers • Primary and chronic care management strategies implemented across care settings • Improved coordination between primary, acute and long-term care services • Aligned networks across Medicare and Medicaid providers • Navigation assistance to get to right providers at the right time • Simplified paperwork and member materials that explain Medicare and Medicaid services and how they fit together • Coordination with behavioral and housing needs
Distinct Population Issues For seniors: • Many opportunities for reducing hospitalization but savings accrue to Medicare • Diversion strategies from nursing homes and high costs community settings (assisted living) For people with disabilities: • High use of specialty care but lack of access to basic primary and preventive care • Many primary care providers unwilling or lack expertise to serve people with disabilities • Majority have co-occurring mental health diagnoses • Not a static population: people with disabilities constantly becoming dual after Medicare waiting period results in continuity of care issues
Primary Issues Facing States • Medicare-paid providers drive primary and acute care. If poorly managed, Medicaid pays for the result (Higher need for long-term care services) • Increased pressure on State budgets due to high growth in dual eligible populations; need to prepare for both fiscal and care delivery challenges • Lack of financial equity for States for investment in aligned/integrated options (immediate savings accrue to Medicare) • Lack of stable scale-able platforms for alignment of Medicaid and Medicare for the future • Access to Medicare data for total cost of care requires State resource investment
Minnesota’s Approach • First state to integrate Medicare and Medicaid primary, acute and long-term care for seniors • Transitioned from Medicare demo to SNP status in 2005 • No complex waivers needed; we use existing state plan and home and community based service authorities under 1915 (a) and (c ). • Close working relationship and ongoing understanding and support from CMS (both Medicare and Medicaid) have been very important • Stakeholder involvement key in acceptance of managed care approach for people with disabilities
Where We’ve Succeeded • SNPs aligned with State long-term care goals for improved access and cost management • Majority of seniors now served in community • 98% of seniors on MSHO now receive annual primary/preventive care visits • State has leveraged integrated Medicare data and coverage of additional care coordination through contracts with Medicare SNPs • Continued enrollment growth in current integrated program for people with disabilities (SNBC) despite loss of some SNPs • Creative environment has produced some total cost of care models (virtual) that manage across payers and domains of care
Not Without Challenges • Limited opportunity for State to share any Medicare and Medicare SNP savings under current models • SNP bid process has resulted in premiums that duals cannot pay and thus lack of stability in SNP participation in integrated programs • Need to stabilize current SNP platform for integration and make it more attractive to States • Need for improvement in Medicare risk adjustment for frail seniors and people with disabilities • Integration of administrative processes: devil is in details, requires expertise and diligence
Moving Forward • Working to bring up PACE in Minnesota • Implementing statewide All Payer Health Care Home including CMS Medicare APC demo • Care Delivery System Payment Demo RFP will be issued soon; future steps expected to include FFS and MCO duals • Duals Demonstration Planning Contract with CMS • Development of performance metrics, risk adjustment, total cost of care payment models and provider feedback mechanisms specific to dual eligibles, consistent across managed care and FFS • Pursuing improvements in current SNP and/or new platforms for integrated financing and service delivery
Contact Information • Scott LeitzAssistant Commissioner for Health CareMinnesota Department of Human Servicesscott.leitz@state.mn.us(651) 431-2012 • Pam ParkerSpecial Needs PurchasingMinnesota Department of Human Servicespam.parker@state.mn.us(651) 431-2512