1 / 23

Measuring biodiversity

Measuring biodiversity. Dr RJ (Bob) Scholes Chair, Global Terrestrial Observing System CSIR Environmentek PO Box 395, Pretoria 0001, South Africa bscholes@csir.co.za. This paper will cover…. Theory of biodiversity observations Existing approaches and systems

lgagne
Download Presentation

Measuring biodiversity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measuring biodiversity Dr RJ (Bob) Scholes Chair, Global Terrestrial Observing System CSIR Environmentek PO Box 395, Pretoria 0001, South Africa bscholes@csir.co.za

  2. This paper will cover… • Theory of biodiversity observations • Existing approaches and systems • Approaches that may satisfy the goals

  3. Biodiversity: 3 aspects x 3 levels Structural Landscape patterns Physiognomy/habitat structure (Noss 1994) Population structure Genetic structure Genetic process Genes Demographicprocess Compositional Interspecific interactions Species, populations Functional Landscapeprocesses/ disturbances/ Communities/ecosystems Landscape type

  4. At any level, diversity has at least two components… • How many different types of things are present • Elephant, rhino and lion is less diverse than • Elephant, rhino, lion, leopard and buffalo • How evenly they are represented • 1000 elephants and 1 lion is less diverse than • 500 elephants and 500 lions

  5. ‘Academic’ ways of measuring biodiversity Species level • Richness: Total number of species in an area ( diversity) • Species turnover along a gradient ( diversity) Ecosystem level • Number of different habitats or ecosystems ( diversity) Genetic level • Genetic homology • Cladistic distance

  6. ‘Policy’ ways of measuring biodiversity • ‘Extinction based’ (IUCN) • Threatened species (Red Data Books) • ‘Area based’(Millennium goals) • Area under protection • Area of a key habitat (eg Forest cover) • ‘Richness based’ • Indicator groups or species eg CI Rapid Biodiversity Assessment • Complementarity –based • Various conservation optimisation tools, eg CPLAN • Various spatial representations • Hotspots, last wild places

  7. Royal Society Report2003 • ‘… no sound basis exists for assessing performance against these targets.’ • ‘The fate of organisms not yet recognised by science cannot be measured’ • Lack of baselines • Biodiversity measures must be related to the objectives of measurement

  8. Attributes of a good indicator • Does it measure what it says it does? • Sensitive, but not oversensitive • Scale appropriate in time and space • Well-understood model • Reliable data available • Monitoring systems in place • Understandable by policymakers (NRC 2000)

  9. Natural Capital IndexRIVM/UNEP-WCMC/GEO-3 NCI = ecosystemquality x ecosystem quantity

  10. Example: NCI for The Netherlands

  11. SAMA* Biodiversity Intactness Index Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Strengthening Capacity to Manage Ecosystems Sustainably for Human Well-Being • Based on impacts on populations, rather than extinctions • Considers a range of impacts • Protected, sustainably used, unsust used, partially transformed, transformed • Scale independent • Applicable now, but amenable to incremental improvement *Southern Africa Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

  12. SAMA Algorithm B = biodiversity intactness index Cijk = populations of i under use k/ popn when protected Ajk= Area of land use k in ecosystem j Rij = Richness of taxon i in ecosystem j i= taxon, from 1 to t j= ecosystem, from 1 to m k= land use type, from 1 to n Needs: Land cover, richness, impact matrix

  13. Worked exampleSouth Africa, biome resolution

  14. WWF Ecoregion database 867 biodiversity-based regions of the world Based on best available information Species lists for birds, mammals, reptiles, plants,amphibia

  15. Global land cover products • Many are now available • DISCover, FAO-FRA, GLC 2000, Modis… • Global coverage, resolution < 1 km • 20 m products available for key areas • Methods and results convergence • GOFC/GOLD (a GTOS panel) • Mid 1990s baselines feasible, year 2000 baseline in hand • Reliable expectation of year 2010 repeat

  16. What GTOS can offerGlobal Terrestrial Observing System • Biodiversity is one of the five mandated topics covered by GTOS • Land, freshwater, cryosphere • Close collaboration with GOOS on coasts • GOOS covers open ocean • TEMS database • ‘biodiversity module’ • Biodiversity network: methods harmonised • GOFC/GOLD • Land cover dynamics, especially forests

  17. Web directory of 1,600 sites and 55 networks in 110 countries that carry out long-term terrestrial ecosystem monitoring of 110 variables TEMS: Terrestrial Ecosystem Monitoring Sites Who, what, where http://www.fao.org/gtos/tems

  18. TEMS Biodiversity module Variables specific to biodiversity: • Colonization of habitat by invasive species • Habitat conversion • Habitat fragmentation • Indicator species • Pollinator species • Species Richness • Threatened Species Many of the other 115 variables in TEMS are also directly linked to Biodiversity.

  19. The CBD and WSSD goalsCBD CoP VII/26, WSSD Implementation Plan Rate 1 Rate 2 Biodiversity rate 2 < rate 1 1990 2000 2010 • ‘..significantly reduce the rate of loss of biodiversity by 2010…’ • This is a ‘double differential’ problem • Change in a rate • Requires at least 3 snapshots in time to solve

  20. Global strategy for plant conservationCBD CoP VI/9 April 2002 • Accessible list of plant species… • Assess status of all species… • Understand conservation needs for threatened species… • 10% of each ecological region, 50% of species conserved in situ • 90% threatened species cons ex situ • 30% of production lands managed consistent with conservation goals

  21. UN Millennium Goals • ‘…reverse the loss of environmental resources…’ • Proposed indicators: • Proportion of land area covered by forest • Proportion of land area protected for biodiversity conservation • These indicators are measurable, but not necessarily sensitive to the goal

  22. Pragmatic issues… • For the purpose of evaluating progress towards the goals, biodiversity measurements • Don’t have to be perfect, just agreed • Need to be based on ‘activity’ rather than ‘stock’ measurements (cf UNFCCC) • Satellite-based land cover measurements, coupled with ‘sparse’ in-situ information in an explicit way (a ‘model’) could do the job for terrestrial systems

  23. A proposal Agree to develop an approach based on • Land cover/use in 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2100 [GOFC/GOLD + WCMC] • Richness within ecosystem units [WWF + Taxonomy initiatives+ NGOs + nations] • An impact matrix (land use x taxa, per biome) derived from site data, models and expert judgement [ Diversitas + GTOS] For test by 2005, and retrospective application by 2010

More Related