310 likes | 739 Views
The following presentation is being provided for informational and educational purposes only.
E N D
1. Using Nasal Pressureto Diagnose Hypopnea
3. The Challenge:Locate and Identify Hypopneas Early sleep research focused on apnea. Later we recognized the reduced airflow/effort pattern we call hypopnea
Hypopnea may be just as physiologically disruptive as apnea
Defined as a 30-50% drop in airflow
Hypopneas have often been undetected – RERA’s, UARS
4. Monitoring Airflow Airflow has been traditionally monitored by using thermocouples and thermistors.
Thermistors and thermocouples are still the most common technique used in labs
These sensors respond to changes in temperature
They are very effective in detecting apneas – where there is no flow.
HOWEVER…..
5. Limitations of Thermistors Thermistors and thermocouples
Have inherently slow response times from the thermal mass of the sensor beads
Have a curvilinear response to temperature change that flattens as airflow increases
6. Actual Flow vs. Thermistor Thermistors have very poor correlation against measures of flow or minute ventilation
Qualitative, but not quantitative
7. Searching for a Better Way Requirements:
Relatively inexpensive
Easy to use
Tolerated by patients
Sensitive to changes in airflow
Specific to real reductions in airflow
8. Research to the Rescue! 1997 - Berg, et al., Comparison of therm, nasal pressure, and RIP to measured ventilation (body box).
Show that NP is much better than therm though not perfect
1998 – Hosselet,et al comparing therm, NP and pneumotach during sleep
Show that NP directly relates to flow and the contour of inspiratory signal is useful in detecting UARS
9. How are Airflow and Pressure Related? Bernouli Principle
Flow is related to pressure, temperature and gas composition
p + ½?V2 + ?gh = constant
10. The Pitot Tube One of the most immediate applications of Bernoulli's equation is in the measurement of velocity with a Pitot-tube.
The Pitot tube (named after the French scientist Pitot) is one of the simplest and most useful instruments ever devised.
It simply consists of a tube bent at right angles
11. The Pitot Tube By pointing the tube directly upstream into the flow and measuring the difference between the pressure sensed by the Pitot tube and the pressure of the surrounding air flow, it can give a very accurate measure of air velocity.
12. Nasal Pressure Response
13. Nasal Cannula as Pitot Tube The nasal cannula, when placed in the nares and terminated at a pressure transducer, acts similar to a Pitot tube
Variations due to gas composition, temperature and placement of cannula ports in the nares affect signal
But the overwhelming result is a reading directly related to the airflow measurement.
14. Making a NP Measurement Using a standard or custom nasal cannula:
Attach to patient
Attach other end to Pressure Transducer
15. NP vs Measured Airflow Linear relationship as flow increases, so does NP
NP is not calibrated and relationship will vary from patient to patient
16. NP vs. Measured Flow NP to flow is not entirely linear
It is nearly linear for the majority of the flow rates of normal breathing
17. AASM Recommendations AASM recommendations published in 1999 indicated that the thermistors and thermocouples are very poor at detecting reduced airflow (though still excellent for apnea)
Pneumotach is best, but not practical
Nasal pressure is somewhere in between
AASM Task Force. Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. Sleep 1999;22:667-689
18. Clinical Significance of Nasal Pressure
19. Normal Breathing Note “sinusoidal” pattern to inspiratory portion of nasal pressure trace
20. Apnea DetectionNP vs Therm NP signal tends to disappear, while thermocouple will show some fluctuations
Thermocouple can respond to extremely low flow better where NP signal is lost
21. Sensitivity of NP NP flow compared with driving pressure via a glottic or esophageal catheter.
22. Hypopnea by NP vs Therm Hypopneas are more evident in the NP trace
The morphology of the trace is indicative
23. Hypopnea by NP vs Therm Note the clear drop in amplitude and change in shape on the NP trace
24. Morphology of NP Signals Detection of Flow Limitation with a Nasal Cannula/Pressure Transducer System, Hosselet JJ, Norman RG, Ayappa I, Rapoport DM; AM J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1461-1467
25. Comparison of AHI NP vs. Therm.
26. Nasal Pressure = More Events Study shows that RDI is at least 5 to 25 events per hour higher with Nasal Pressure
COMPARISON OF NASAL PRESSURE AND THERMISTOR RECORDINGS IN THE DETECTION OF SLEEP-DISORDERED BREATHING EVENTS, Cunninham SL, Shea SA, White DP; SLEEP Vol. 21, Supplement, pp 62
27. Detecting Snore with NP Snore can be detected in NP signal if filtered appropriately (Low Pass = 70Hz)
Usually used as second trace to keep NP flow trace clean
28. Snoring Sample
29. Problems with NP Over scoring of AHI with NP
Mouth breathing - #1 concern
Requires appropriate pressure transducer and amplifier settings
Fluid blockage from condensation and “patient sources”
Minimal issue,
Remedied with replacement cannula
Increased nasal resistance from presence of nasal prongs
30. Linearized Flow from NP Square root of pressure is flow
Processed signal is closer to pneumotach flow
Improved linear response compared to straight NP
Farre, Monteserat, 2001
31. Clinical Effect from Derived Flow from NP Hosselet, et al (1998) suggested it made little clinical difference and that hypopnea events were more exaggerated in the NP trace than the derived flow trace.
But since the relationship between nasal pressure and nasal flow is a square function, a 50% drop in NP reflects a 30% drop in flow; a 75% drop in NP reflects a 50% drop in flow (approximately)
32. Affect on Hypopnea Detection Farre, et al, 2001, concluded that NP can over-detect hypopneas, due to the square response and that when using NP a 75% drop in signal from baseline could be used to score hypopneas.
33. Adjusted AHI for Nasal Flow Thurnheer, et al, 2001, found that using the derived flow from the NP signal (square root of pressure) resulted in a lower AHI.
They suggested using a factor of .84 to correct the overestimation of the AHI from NP.
34. Mouth Breathing An example of exaggerated mouth breathing
Increased signal at mouth transition – from additional sensor at mouth
Note the NP signal does not disappear
35. Mouth Breathing In most cases, mouth breathing will not eliminate flow through the nose.
Only 1-2% of cases will lose nasal airflow completely (Monteserrat, et al)
36. Technical Considerations of NP Pressure transducer range - ±2 to ±10cm H20 since signal rarely exceeds 4cm H2O
If using AC Amplifier, HPF (LFF) should be set to 0.05 Hz or less
To see snoring, LPF (HFF) must be at 30Hz or higher (preferably closer to 100Hz)
Digital sampling rate must be at least twice LPF setting. (10Hz to 256 Hz)
37. NP & ? Nasal Resistance Lorino AM, et al noted a significant increase in nasal resistance from the nasal prongs from a standard oxygen cannula
Depends on size of nares
Affected by shape of nose and soft tissue
Also affected by nasal congestion from allergies and viral infections
Care should be taken to use a cannula with small nasal prongs
38. Does NP Meet the Criteria? Easy to use – Yes
Relatively inexpensive – Yes
Tolerated by patients – Yes
Sensitivity - Yes
Specificity – Much better than thermal sensors but may over detect apneas
39. With Nasal Pressure have we Found Hypopnea? NP detects more hypopneas than thermal with consistently higher AHI’s, but it can over score if rules are not adjusted.
NP provides both amplitude and morphology change with events that help detect UARS
NP is easy to use (assuming transducer and recording system are setup correctly)
NP has limitations but they are outweighed by the advantages.
40. Should the Rules Change? Hypopnea guidelines for flow have been developed and followed using thermal sensors.
If NP is used, should the rule be changed to use a 50% drop in signal (indicating a 30% reduction in flow) to indicate hypopnea?
Should the AHI be adjusted?
41. References Measurement of Human Nasal Ventilation Using an Oxygen Cannula as a Pitot Tube. Guyatt AR, Parker SP, McBride MJ; ARRD 126:434-438, 1984
Detection of Respiatory Events During NPSG: Nasal Cannula Pressure Sensor Versus Thermistor. Norman RG, Ahmed MM, Walsleben JA, Rapoport DM; Sleep 20(12):1175-1184, 1997
Comparison of Direct and Indirect Measurements of Respiratory Airflow: Implications for Hypopneas. Berg S, Haight JS, Yap V, Hoffstein V, Cole P; Sleep 20:60-64, 1997
Evaluation of Nasal Prongs for Estimating Nasal Flow. Montserrat JM, Farre R, Ballester E, Felez MA, Pasto M, Navajas D; AJCCM 155:211-215, 1997
Detection of Flow Limitation with a Nasal Cannula Pressure Transducer System. Hosselet JJ, Norman RG, Ayappa I, Rapoport DM; AJRCCM 157:1461-1467, 1998
Comparison of Nasal Pressure and Thermistor Recordings in the Detection of Sleep-Disordered Breathing Events. Cunninham SL, Shea SA, White DP; Sleep Vol. 21, Supplement, pp 62, 1999
Nasal Pressure Recording in the Diagnosis of Sleep Apnoea Hypopnea Syndrome. Series F, Marc I; Thorax 54:506-510, 1999
AASM Task Force Report. Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. Sleep 22:667-689, 1999
42. References (cont.) Effects of Nasal Prongs on Nasal Airflow Resistance. Lorino AM, Lorino H, Dahan E, d’Ortho MP, Coste A, Harf A, Lofaso F; Chest 11892):366-371, 2000
Classification of Sleep-disordered Breathing. Hosselet JJ, Ayappa I, Norman RG, Rapoport DM; AJRCCM 163(2):398-405, 2001
Acuracy of Nasal Cannula Pressure Recordings fo Assessment of Ventilation during Sleep. Thurnheer R, Xiaobin X, Bloch K; AJRCCM Vol 164:1914-1919, 2001
Relevance of Linearizing Nasal Prongs for Assessing Hypopneas and Flow Limitation During Sleep. Farre R, Rigau J, Montserrat J, Ballester E, Navajas D; AJRCCM 163:494-497, 2001
Performance o Nasal Prongs in Sleep Studies: Spectrum of Flow-Related Events. Hernandez L, Bellester E, Farre R, Badia JR, Lobelo R, Navajas D, Montserrat JM; Chest 119:442-450, 2001
Assessment of Inspiratory Flow Limitation in Children with Sleep-disordered Breathing by a Nasal Cannula Pressure Transducer System. Sererisky D, Cordero R, Mandeli J, Kattan M, Lamm C; Pediatric Pulmonology 33:380-387, 2002