180 likes | 590 Views
Abduction Using Neural Models by Madan Bharadwaj Instructor: Dr.Avelino Gonzalez Agenda Introduce the Concept Why Neural Approach ? UNIFY Hopfield Model Critique Summary Abduction & NN’s What are Neural Networks? What is Abduction? The Analogy Figure 1:
E N D
Abduction Using Neural Models by Madan Bharadwaj Instructor: Dr.Avelino Gonzalez
Agenda • Introduce the Concept • Why Neural Approach ? • UNIFY • Hopfield Model • Critique • Summary
Abduction & NN’s • What are Neural Networks? • What is Abduction?
The Analogy Figure 1: Handwritten Characters. A’s and B’s Figure 2: After training the Neural Network classifies data into classes
Major References • “A Unified Model for Abduction-Based Reasoning” by Ayeb et al • “A Neural Architecture for a Class of Abduction Problems” by Goel et al
Types of Abd. Problems • 4 Major Types • Open & Incompatible Classes
UNIFY • NN Architecture reflects problem dynamics • Tackles all 4 classes • Architecture incrementally introduced • Simple Architecture
Hypothesis Layer Observation Layer Inhibitory Weights Excitatory Weights UNIFY - Initial Model
The Algorithm • Initialize cells and weights • Update cells and weights • Check Termination condition
UNIFIED MODEL Intermediate Layer
Modifications • Incompatibility Weights • Modified Equations
Experiments • Toy Problems • Real Life Problem • Results very encouraging
Hopfield Model • Energy Function approach • Only linear and monotonic classes • Partition data into sub domains • Map sub domains • Minimize Energy Function • ART Model also proposed
Critique • Fuzzy Framework essential for abduction • Neural Networks still abstract
Future Avenues • Cancellation Class • Better designs using ART • Evolving Architectures • Other Approaches
Summary • Neural Network Approach feasible • UNIFY is better • Vast scope for further research
References [1]. B.Ayeb, S.Wang and J.Ge, “A Unified Model for Abduction-Based Reasoning” IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol 28, No. 4, July 1998 [2]. A.K. Goel and J. Ramanujam, “A Neural Architecture for a Class of Abduction Problems”, IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part B – Cybernetics, Vol. 26, No. 6, December 1996 [3]. _____, “A Connectionist Model for Diagnostic Problem Solving: Part II”, IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics., Vol19, pp. 285-289, 1989 [4]. A. Goel, J. Ramanujam and P. Sadayappan, “Towards a ‘neural’ architecture of abductive reasoning”, in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Neural Networks, 1988, pp. I-681-I-688. [5]. D.Poole, A. Mackworth and R.Goebel, “Computational Intelligence: A Logical Approach”, pp 319-343, Oxford University Press, 1998. [6]. C. Christodoulou and M. Georgiopoulos, “Applications of Neural Networks in Electromagnetics”, Boston: Artech House, 2001. [7]. Castro, J.L.; Mantas, C.J.; Benitez, J.M., “Interpretation of artificial neural networks by means of fuzzy rules”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, Jan. 2002. Page(s): 101 –116 [8]. T. Bylander, D. Allemang, M. C. Tanner, and J. R. Josephon, “The computational complexity of abduction,” Artif. Intell., vol. 49, pp. 25–60, 1991.