90 likes | 297 Views
Benefit design. Trustee training. DOH vs CMS strategy. Hospital care. Primary care. BBP. DOH. CMS. Primary care. Hospital care. 1990s vs 2000s. Traditional plans 100% 80% 70% Nu-gen 100% benefit Nu-gen co-payment / risk share plans . Healthcare Product.
E N D
Benefit design Trustee training
DOH vs CMS strategy Hospital care Primary care BBP DOH CMS Primary care Hospital care
1990s vs 2000s • Traditional plans • 100% • 80% • 70% • Nu-gen 100% benefit • Nu-gen co-payment / risk share plans
Healthcare Product • Like any other commercial product • Identify market • Targeting and segmenting • Age/sex distribution • Salary distribution • Geographic distribution • Identify needs • Age/sex distribution • Disease profile • Will PMB/CDL be enough? • Access: Geographic distibution • Meet the needs • Satisfied member / Grow the demand • Build the brand / loyalty
First step • Demographic profile • Developed world • Developing world • One cross subsidised product or…. • Public health needs • Maslow’s theory • Consumer demands • Marketing/branding benefits
Public health needs • Water, sanitation, housing, security • Primary care: • Immunisation, • preventative care, • Consults, medicine, diagnostic, dental and optical benefits • Consumer demand • Comprehensive hospital cover – high ticket item • High cost outpatient care cover e.g. MRIs • Marketing benefit • Lifestyle benefits
Some benefit design scenarios Non-PMB chronic cover Savings Risk transferr Risk transferr Savings Non-PMB chronic cover Savings Higher add-on benefits: Some non-PMBs specified in terms of Rand amount per member per year and / or limits for specific forms of treatment Savings Add-on benefit: some non-PMBs specified in terms of Rand or limits Non-PMB hospital cover Prescribed minimum benefits Adapted from Trustee training presentation,E Stipp 2005.
Provider re-imbursement • FFS • Per diems • DRG • Capitation • Risk adjusted capitation • Risk share arrangements