1 / 18

PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

Palace of Fine Arts Feasibility Study. PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION. MAIN ENTRY FLOW – MAYBECK VISION. PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION. REINTRODUCE THE CENTRAL ENTRY.

libitha
Download Presentation

PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Palace of Fine Arts Feasibility Study PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  2. MAIN ENTRY FLOW – MAYBECK VISION PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  3. REINTRODUCE THE CENTRAL ENTRY PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  4. CENTRAL ENTRY - CONCEPT PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  5. CENTRAL ENTRY - CONCEPT PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  6. REINTEGRATE DAYLIGHT Current Add one pair of skylights Add glass at monitor PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  7. PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  8. 1A PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  9. HISTORIC PRESERVATION NOTES • National Register of Historic Places • Entire complex – site, lagoon & structures – is listed as a “district” • Listed as an example of Conservation • Periods of Significance 1964-1967 and 1973-1974. • Exhibition Hall • Not a faithful representation of original Maybeck design • Only some doors, chimneys/fireplaces and steel truss structure are original. • Legend • Significant • Contributing • Non-Contributing. PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  10. HISTORIC PRESERVATION • Significant • Contributing • Non- • Contributing. PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  11. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  12. COST PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  13. STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS • Existing Structure is Code Compliant • 1993 seismic retrofit allows the building to comply with current structural codes • No “Trigger Events” • Add area – connected mezzanines, vertical additions. • Remove lateral structure • Increase mass of the building • Increase occupancy • While not required by code, Structural Engineer strongly recommends improvements to Foundation and Trusses. • To deal with liquefaction of soil • To deal with lack of redundancy between gravity and lateral systems • To be confirmed with Building Department PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  14. MECHANICAL / ELECT / PLUMBING / FIRE PROTECTION / CIVIL • Building and site infrastructure is inadequate & will be upgraded or replaced for future tenant: • Mechanical • Electrical • Plumbing • Fire Protection • Civil • Water/ Waste Water systems • Surface Drainage • Stormwater Infrastructure PALACE OF FINE ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY 24 JAN 2013 RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION

  15. Two Phased Process The Department is conducting a two phased competitive bidding process First phase: Request for Concept Proposals (RFCP) • Provides for a lower barrier of entrance • Gives Department and public a broad view of high level possible concepts Second phase: Invite only Request for Proposals (RFP) • Only the highest scoring bidders from the RFCP will be invited to advance to the invite only RFP • RFP will ask for a much higher level of detail from respondents

  16. Mandatory Requirements • Building usage must fulfill a recreational purpose (per City of San Francisco Charter) • New tenant must have the ability to fund the required structural improvements to the Building

  17. Key RFCP Terms • Restoring the Palace of Fine Arts • Obtaining a financially viable tenant to enter into a long term lease agreement to provide valuable services and amenities • Obtaining a tenant that will compliment and connect existing amenities in the surrounding area • Enhance visitors’ experience to the Palace of Fine Arts and surrounding park • Provide significant public access to the Palace • Provide a use that will continually engage the public over the duration of the term • Provide for a public central entryway concept • Proposals that include restoring, retaining and operating the historic Palace of Fine Arts Theater by a nonprofit theater group are encouraged.

  18. Questions?

More Related