1 / 2

CARESIM

GAD mortality projections; various assumptions . CARESIM. FRS respondents aged 65+ money values uprated to base year. ‘Age’ the sample (no refreshment) death widowhood evolution of income & wealth. output year > base year?. Yes. tax, benefit, care charging rates. No.

lihua
Download Presentation

CARESIM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GAD mortality projections; various assumptions CARESIM FRS respondents aged 65+ money values uprated to base year • ‘Age’ the sample (no refreshment) • death • widowhood • evolution of income & wealth output year > base year? Yes tax, benefit, care charging rates No simulate income tax liability, benefit entitlement, care charges for each of 7 care situations for pre and post reform charging system • % who self-fund • mean %age user contribution for non self-funders • mean contribution of disability benefits, self-funders & non self-funders • ALL BY TYPE CARE to PSSRU Attach weights by age, gender, marital status, tenure & care type, from PSSRU model Distributional analyses (mean cont’ns from state, user, gains from reforms) by income, housing tenure.. from PSSRU

  2. CARESIM: scope for links with other WPs & models • improved/alternative mortality • by socioeconomic status • correlating mortality of partners • availability of carers (and hence eligibility for Carers’ Allowance) • refreshing the sample – using/learning from PPI model

More Related