Welcome to Seminar! PS 512 Unit 2 Any questions to start??

1. Welcome to Seminar! PS 512 Unit 2 Any questions to start??

2. Issues in Single Subject Research • Prediction • Verification • Replication • Reliability • Validity • Ethics

3. We use single subject research to determine functional relationships between variables in Applied Behavior Analysis • As in any experimental design, we manipulate the Independent Variable and measure the dependent variable. • Independent Variable=Intervention • Dependent Variable= Target Behavior • We measure behavioral and environmental events, apply interventions, then determine whether there is any change due to our interventions

4. It is essential that we: • Define and measure independent and dependent variables with precision • Control manipulation of the independent variable and measurement of the dependent variable and, • Identify and Control outside factors that may be influencing our variables of interest

5. Example • Use of A DRO Procedure for Reducing Disruptive Outbursts in the Classroom • Independent Variable: Use of positive reinforcement • Definition: When the student is in seat and quiet, the teacher will give praise and a token every 5 minutes. • Dependent Variable: Not Disruptive • Definition: Student is in seat and quiet

6. Procedure • Measure Baseline • Apply Intervention • Measure Change

7. Prediction: If there is no effect attributable to the independent variable (intervention), the dependent variable’s data path will remain the same Verification: Confirmation that the dependent variable is changing in a predictable fashion Replication: Repeating of the observed predictions and verifications within the same study

8. A B A Baseline Praise Baseline 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Frequency of disruptions 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Day

9. Validity • Internal Validity : Degree to which the researcher has adequately controlled the independent, dependent, and extraneous variables • Extraneous Variables: Anything outside the study that may be affecting the results • Confounding Variables

10. Threats to Internal Validity • History • Passage of time and effect of external events over time • Maturation • Natural development of an individual over time • Attrition • Loss of subjects during a study • Multiple Treatment Interference • Effects caused by use of more than one intervention • Treatment Drift • Individuals responsible for administering interventions making changes to procedures

11. External Validity • External Validity: Degree to which other researchers are likely to achieve the same results with other individuals, other target behaviors, or in other settings. • External Validity is demonstrated through • Direct and Systematic Replication:

12. Direct Replication • Attempts to duplicate the procedures as closely as possible • Systematic Replication • Varying conditions from earlier studies, but achieving similar results

13. Ethics • Single subject designs incorporate very powerful means for changing behavior, and • Are often used to treat people in vulnerable populations • People with DD • Children, etc. Review Guidelines on Page 99 of your text Review BACB.com Guidelines for Responsible Conduct

14. PS 512Looking Ahead to Unit 3 Withdrawal Designs

15. Readings: Chapter 5, Chapter 6 • Schilling, D., & Schwartz, I. (2004). Alternative Seating for Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Effects on Classroom Behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August, Vol. 34(4), p.423-432. Retrieved from ERIC Database.

16. Basic Withdrawal Designs Withdrawal designs provide direct evidence for Prediction, Verification, and Replication • AB Baseline / Treatment • ABA Baseline/ Treatment / Baseline • ABAB Baseline/ Treatment/ Baseline/ Treatment • Of these designs, the ABAB is the most useful for demonstrating functional relationships

17. Withdrawal Designs Video

18. Withdrawal designs are useful : • For demonstrating clear functional relationships between variables • When the intervention can be reversed • When the effects of the intervention will not remain once the treatment is reversed • When withdrawal of treatment does not compromise ethics

19. Example • The effect of praise on increasing ‘In Seat’ behavior • First Steps: • Define ‘In Seat’ • Define ‘Praise’

20. Withdrawal designs are less useful: • When the target behavior is not reversible • When the treatment effects continue after the treatment is withdrawn • When it’s not in the client’s best interest to return to baseline • When withdrawal of treatment would be unethical

21. Examples Using Physical Prompting and Differential Reinforcement to decrease self injurious face slapping Problem: It may be dangerous or unethical to withhold treatment while collecting baseline data or in a reversal phase Aversive treatment to eliminate ‘alcohol drinking’ behavior Problem: Effects of aversive therapy are likely to linger beyond the treatment period

22. Variations of the Basic Withdrawal Design • BAB Treatment/ Baseline/ Treatment • When impossible or inappropriate to take an extended baseline • ABABAB Base/Treat/Base/Treat/Base/Treat • To increase confidence in the functionality of the relationship we’ve demonstrated • ABC Baseline/Treat 1/Treat 2 • When trialing different treatments • ABAC Base/Treat 1/Base/Treat 2 • When trying to increase experimental control while trialing different treatments

23. Use Physical Prompting and Differential Reinforcement to decrease self injurious face slapping

24. Using Token Reinforcement to increase percentage of time spent “In Seat”ABAB

25. ABACUsing Praise, then Token to Increase % Time in Seat

26. Down load this ppt and run as slide show to view embedded videos • Graphing Single Subject Reversal Design with Excel

27. Down load ppt and run as slide show to view videos • Importing your graph into a word document

28. Questions?