Characters of the Canterbury Tales

Characters of the Canterbury Tales Satire in Chaucer’s “Prologue” to The Canterbury Tales

Social Status Medieval society judged social status according to a person’s dress, wealth, or career, just as we do, but at a much greater (and more serious) degree. People were judged greatly by their appearance, and appearance determined social class

Physiognomy 1. The art of judging human character from facial features. 2. Divination based on facial features. 3. Facial features, especially when regarded as revealing character from Gk. physiognomia "the judging of a person's nature by his features," from physio-, "nature" + gnomon (gnomonos) "judge, indicator."

distinguished followed chivalry truthful, honorable won many battles honored for his graces “modest as a maid” a true, perfect knight “wore a tunic stained and dark where his armor had left mark” NOT satirized He represents all that is good about knighthood and nobility. Good example from the nobility. Knight

lover curly locks fought in nearby battles so he could get home to see the ladies sang, danced, wrote poetry and songs could “joust and dance” “embroidered like a meadow” “loved so hotly that till dawn grew pale/He slept as little as a nightingale” was courteous and serviceable when father was around IS satirized for his insincerity Squire

wore coat & hood of green was servant to knight, yet a freeman feathers were perfectly made in arrows knew his business as an archer and did it well showed proper religious respect by wearing St. Christopher medal was a “proper forester” NOT satirized. Good example from the middle class Yeoman

coy (falsely modest, flirtatious) known as Madam Eglantyne (common heroine for romance novels of the Middle Ages) tried to exude grace, manners, and sophistication, but spoke a very poor quality of French owned hunting dogs (not proper for her) fed dogs roasted flesh and fine food while people were starving yet was overly upset when a mouse died Prioress (Nun)

glass-gray eyes (deceptive) forehead was “fair of spread” (but a span from brow to brow--very large woman) cloak had a graceful charm (another reference to large features) jewelry with “Amor vincit omnia” (Love conquers all) which may have meant romantic love, not God’s IS satirized Prioress (Nun) (cont’d)

riding a horse, which he was not to do ignored rules of his order was “progressive” but supposed to be poor lazy owned dogs, which he was not to do expensive clothing (fur on sleeve) when monk is to be poor fat (opposite of his vows) glittering, bulging eyes (physiognomy) IS satirized Monk

“fixed up” marriages “intimate” with city dames claimed to have license from Pope to hear confessions--charged money as penance gifts to girls knew taverns and barmaids well white neck, lisp (physiog.) wanton (lecherous) begged money even from poorest, whom he was to help charged money on “settling days” Hubert Plays the “hurdy-gurdy” IS satirized strongly Friar

forking beard (physiognomy) gave many opinions dabbled in exchanges seemed stately but... was in debt and no one knew it from the way he talked IS satirized Note that the satire here is not as strong as it was for Monk, Friar, and Prioress. Why was the satire so light for the middle class and the nobility, yet so harsh for religious? Merchant

hollow look threadbare clothing could not find a job in the church was too unworldly for secular employment borrowed money from friends, never repaid was “book smart” but “life dumb” IS satirized This demonstrates the patronage of church positions, which often were bought and sold. Oxford Cleric (Student)

one of 20 “traveling judges” in Chaucer’s day was an experienced lawyer expert on real estate law wore a “parti-colored coat” with a silken belt of pin-stripe found loopholes in law to deprive heirs of their land could argue cases either way with impunity IS satirized Sergeant at the Law

wealthy landowner lived for pleasure, particularly “Epicurean” delights Enjoyed his food, had a table prepared all day long IS not greatly satirized Again, note how light the satire is of this wealthy man compared to others Franklin

treat all of these as a single character the key to under-standing them is their wives they LOOK great (new looking gear which was bought used) • their wives “declared it was their due” whether the men believed it or not wives wanted to be called “Madam” and to be “seen” -- like a queen they ARE satirized Haberdasher, Dyer, Carpenter, Weaver, and Carpet-Maker

could distinguish London ale by flavor (which was quite cheap -- like being able to distinguish Faygo from Food Club cola, etc.) had ulcer on his knee (probably from cooking at open pot) Cook

made good thick soup made good blancmange (yellow-white, thick, creamy chicken soup--much the color of what might be in the ulcer) IS satirized Cook

rode a farmer’s horse well (an insult) skin was tanned (a mark of low breeding) stole wine while the trader slept ignored conscience “sent his prisoners home” IS satirized Skipper

grounded in astronomy, as most doctors in the Middle Ages were “All his apothecaries in a tribe / Were ready with the drugs he would prescribe...” “blood-red garments, slashed with bluish grey / And lined with taffeta did not read the Bible “kept the gold he won in pestilences” “Gold stimulates the heart, or so we’re told…” IS satirized Doctor

tight, red clothing had five husbands, all at the church door bold face, gap-teeth large hips gone to Jerusalem 3x “knew the remedies for love’s mischances” had a unique interpretation of Scriptures which gave her control in her marriages IS satirized Wife of Bath (woman from Bath)

holy-minded poor learned devout patient noble a shepherd virtuous rich in holy thought served the poor gave own money practiced what he preached NOT satirized Parson

honest worker, good and true followed the Gospel steadily went about his work helped poor from love always paid his tithes in full when due rode a mare NOT satirized Plowman

great stout fellow boasted he could heave any door off the hinge or break it with his head red beard wart on end of nose weighed 224 pounds told filthy tavern stories “stole” grain with his “thumb of gold” played bagpipes led procession hated the Reeve IS satirized Miller

buyer of food for the 30 Knights of the Temple (lawyers) got to market early to get best values was illiterate wise in practical matters, though lived debt free on what he “saved” IS satirized somewhat Manciple

supervisor of the serfs “calf-less legs” no one ever caught him in arrears knew the serfs’ dodges, so they feared him better at bargains than his lord was a carpenter rode at back of procession hated the Miller IS satirized Reeve

face like a cherubim carbuncles and pimples black scabby brows, thin beard frightened the children ate garlic, onions, leeks drank wine ‘til all was hazy took bribes: quart of wine or “favors” from women threatened excommunication IS satirized Summoner

from Charing Cross hair yellow, long, hung “like rat-tails” bulging eyeballs carried pardons from Rome, he said goat-like voice could not grow a beard Pardoner

“I judge he was a gelding, or a mare.” pillow case = “Our Lady’s veil” gobbet of Peter’s sail pigs’ bones sang Offertory well always worked IS satirized Pardoner

served finest victuals bright eyes, wide girth suggested the tale-telling contest prize would be a meal for the winner paid for by the others everyone stayed at inn return trip would mean another round of meals and lodging he would be sole judge of the tales accompanied the pilgrims to Canterbury IS NOT heavily satirized Host

Chaucer • Traveling to Canterbury and staying at the Tabard Inn where 29 other pilgrims stay the night • Will try to give an accurate description of the pilgrims—”according to profession and degree”

Nature of the Tales • commonly told stories • stories were interactive with others’ tales • Friar told a tale to insult the Monk and vice versa • Reeve told a tale to insult the Miller, etc.

Characters of the Canterbury Tales