300 likes | 492 Views
TMA Systems Design Review Topics of Discussion. Overview
E N D
1. ATSTTelescopeMountAssembly
2. TMA Systems Design ReviewTopics of Discussion Overview & Charge to Committee (Mark)
6 Major Parts of SDR:
SRD Flow-down & Error Budgets (Rob Hubbard)
Specifications (Mark)
Reference Designs (Bret Goodrich, Mark)
Lunch
Performance & Analyses (Myung Cho)
Contracting Approach (Mark)
Risk Areas (Mark)
Plans for Future Work (Mark)
AOB
Executive Session (closed session for committee members)
Feedback from Committee (All Hands)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dinner Explain I’ll get back to the 5 parts in a moment
We have a couple of short breaks scheduled throughout the day, plus a lunch at noonExplain I’ll get back to the 5 parts in a moment
We have a couple of short breaks scheduled throughout the day, plus a lunch at noon
3. Presentation Overview Top-Level Functional Requirements
Specification Document Summary
Interface Control Documents
Safety Requirements
QA/QC Requirements
4. Top-Level TMA RequirementsOptic & Instrument Mounting Requirement: Provide stiff, precision mounting interfaces for the optic assemblies and instruments:
M1-M6 mirror assemblies, heat stop, Lyot stop assembly, and calibration optics
M7-M9 mirror assemblies, coudé instruments
M3n-M5n Nasmyth optics and instrument These “big picture” type requirements are pretty much standard for any large telescope.
Our approach to quantifying the requirement, and then specifying them in the SD was: 1) approach them from a top-down look (e.g., in the error budget) (Rob has already talked about this previously) (top down come from experience, other telescope projects, and the like) and then 2) using top-down as a target, analyze our structure and (iteratively) arrive at an appropriate spec.These “big picture” type requirements are pretty much standard for any large telescope.
Our approach to quantifying the requirement, and then specifying them in the SD was: 1) approach them from a top-down look (e.g., in the error budget) (Rob has already talked about this previously) (top down come from experience, other telescope projects, and the like) and then 2) using top-down as a target, analyze our structure and (iteratively) arrive at an appropriate spec.
5. Top-Level TMA RequirementsOptic & Instrument Mounting: M1-M6
6. Top-Level TMA RequirementsOptic & Instrument Mounting: M7-M9
7. Top-Level TMA RequirementsOptic & Instrument Mounting: M3n-M5n
8. Top-Level TMA RequirementsPoint, Track, & Slew Requirement: Provide accurate and repeatable pointing, tracking and slewing of the optics over their full required ranges of travel
Top-down requirement from open-loop pointing (SRD)
Bottom-up estimates from other large telescope as-built performance
9. Top-Level TMA RequirementsLight Path Requirement: Provide an unobstructed optical path from the sun, to/through all optics, to the instrument stations at the Nasmyth and coudé foci—with acceptable seeing and stray-light characteristics
Top-down requirement (mount seeing) is NA in error budget
Unobstructed, fully shaded structure with low thermal mass and ventilation.
(Bottom-up via thermal analysis of mount structure)
10. Top-Level TMA RequirementsInstrument & Optic R&R Requirement: Provide for periodic instrument and optics R&R (e.g., M1 recoating operations)
Top down requirement from SRD: telescope must be optimized for “efficiency”
Bottom-up requirements from NIC subassembly designs
11. Top-Level Functional Requirements (cont.) Requirement: TMA shall be safe for personnel and equipment
Top down: ATST Project Tenet
Bottom-up:
OSHA & HIOSH compliance
Provide integrated safety systems for personnel and telescope (e.g., M1 cover; GIS interface, etc.)
Safety reviews
Etc…
12. TMA Specifications Document (SPEC-0011) The “SD” contains all the specifications & requirements that the Contractor must use when designing and constructing the TMA
Performance, Engineering & Functional Specifications
Traceability of specs fall into three major categories:
Traceable to SDR (e.g., Jitter, Coincidence of Az. Axes)
Traceable to Use Cases (e.g., Settling Times)
Traceable to “BEP” (e.g., Braking, Torque Margins, Factors of Safety)
Contractor required to create a Compliance Matrix that includes all numbered specs in SD
States how spec will be verified (e.g., test, inspection, analysis, etc.)
? SD organized into 10 Major Subsystems + General (design, fab, metrology, shipping, assembly) + Safety requirements “CEP” Common Engineering Practices (Engineering Experience)“CEP” Common Engineering Practices (Engineering Experience)
13. 1.1 Mount Structure Requirements Performance:
Mount payload definitions
Overall structure characteristics
Size, mass, resonant frequency
Flexure (M1-M6, M3n-M5n displacements)
Static & Dynamic
Individual Mirror Displacements & Rotations
Line of Sight (LOS) requirements (including M7-M9)
Thermal Deflections
Seismic
Assembly & Bearing precision
E.g., perpendicularity of azimuth and altitude axes.
Functional & Engineering:
Bearing systems
Personnel access
14. 1.2 Mount Drive Requirements Performance:
Alt, Az ranges of travel and limits
Velocity and acceleration
Pointing and tracking
Jitter, stability, drift, settling time
Engineering & Functional:
Encoders
Over-speed sensing
Brakes
Drives (torques, etc.)
15. 1.3 Coudé Rotator Structure Requirements Performance:
Rotator payload definitions
Overall structure characteristics
Size, mass, resonant frequency
Flexure (M7-M9, instrument displacements)
Static (dynamic covered above in Mount)
Individual Mirror Displacements & Rotations
Thermal Deflections
Seismic
Assembly & Bearing Precision
E.g., azimuth axis coincident with mount structure
Functional & Engineering:
Bearing systems
Personnel access
Electronic enclosure requirements
16. 1.4 Coudé Rotator Drive Requirements Performance:
Azimuth range of travel & limits
Velocity and acceleration
Pointing and tracking
Jitter, stability, drift, settling time
Engineering & Functional:
Encoders
Over-speed sensing
Brakes
Drives (torques, etc.)
17. 1.5 Nasmyth Rotator Structure Requirements Performance:
Nasmyth Instrument payload definitions
Overall structure characteristics
Resonant frequency
Flexure (instrument displacements)
Static (dynamic covered above in Mount)
Thermal Deflections
Seismic
Assembly & Bearing Precision
E.g., rotation axis coincident with mount altitude axis
18. 1.6 Nasmyth Drive Requirements Performance:
Range of travel & limits
Velocity and acceleration
Pointing and tracking
Jitter, stability, drift, settling time
Engineering & Functional:
Encoders
Over-speed sensing
Brakes
Drives (torques, etc.)
19. 1.7 Ancillary Mech. Equipment Requirements Locking Pin Assemblies
Positions
Design Loads & Factor of Safety
20. 1.7 Ancillary Mech. Equipment (cont.) Enclosure Avoidance System
(Safety)
Cable Wraps
Stiction
Capacity
21. 1.7 Ancillary Mech. Equipment (cont.) ?Mirror Cover Assembly
Fail-safe closure
Mirror protection
22. 1.7 Ancillary Mech. Equipment (cont.)
23. 1.8 MCS Requirements Functional: TMA Control
operational
startup and initialization
target acquisition
on-target operations (offset, scan)
stow and shutdown
IT&C
acceptance & performance tests
engineering
single axis motion
full control of each component
24. 1.8 MCS Requirements (cont.) Functional: TMA status
reporting and logging
component status
configuration states
health and alarms
faults, traces
performance
25. 1.8 MCS Requirements (cont.) Functional: Interfacing
ATST Common Services
connection and event services
property service
log and archive services
Telescope Control System
commands
modes (park, slew, track, …)
trajectories
status
Enclosure Control System
follow ECS
26. 1.9 LIC Requirements Functional: Safety
detect
mount-enclosure collision
end-of-travel, over-speed
temperature, pressure
Castell keys, e-stops, doors
interlock
directly to hardware power
report
to and from GIS
one-way to MCS
one-way to engineering display
27. 1.10 Telescope Pier Requirements Performance:
Stiffness & Capacity
Soil Interface
Engineering & Functional:
Flooring & Stairs
Man-Lift
Coudé Crane
Lighting
28. Interface Control Documents ICDs define the interfaces between the TMA and other “NIC” subsystems (e.g., M1)
Each ICD contains 6+1 major subcategories:
Mechanical (e.g., bolt patterns)
Optical (e.g., beam clearance)
Electronic/Electrical (e.g., cabling, power)
Mass/Balance
Thermal (e.g., coolant)
Software/Control
(Safety Issues) Explain: ICDs are notoriously difficult to write, complete, release. Don’t know why (human nature, proscrastination) Completion scheme is as follows:
Whenever a subsystem undergoes an SDR, all ICDs must be initiated
When the second, interconnecting subsystem undergoes its SDR all interfaces must be identified
Shortly after the second subsystems SDR, the ICD must be completed and released
Explain: ICDs are notoriously difficult to write, complete, release. Don’t know why (human nature, proscrastination) Completion scheme is as follows:
Whenever a subsystem undergoes an SDR, all ICDs must be initiated
When the second, interconnecting subsystem undergoes its SDR all interfaces must be identified
Shortly after the second subsystems SDR, the ICD must be completed and released
29. Interface Control Documents (cont.) Currently there are 14 identified ICDs that “touch” the TMA
1.1/1.2 TMA-to-M1 Assembly
1.1/1.4 TMA-to-M2 Assembly (includes HS, Lyot Stop)
1.1/1.5 TMA-to-Feed Optics
1.1/1.7 TMA-to-System Alignment
1.1/2.1 TMA-to-Coudé Wavefront
1.1/2.2 TMA-to-Nasmyth Wavefront
1.1/3.1.1 TMA-to-Polarimetry
1.1/3.1.2 TMA-to-Nasmyth Station
1.1/4.4 TMA-to-TCS
1.1/4.5 TMA-to-GIS
1.1/5.0 TMA-to-Enclosure
1.1/6.2 TMA-to-SO Building
1.1/6.6 TMA-to-System Interconnects
May add 1.1/6.5 TMA-to-Handling Equipment (articulated man lift attached to stationary TMA telescope-level flooring)
30. Safety Requirements This will be a “safety-first” project, from the kick-off meeting, through all phases of the Work, to the final punch-list close-out effort at the Site, and then on into operations
We require the Contractor to appoint a safety officer who has no other role in the project
We require the Contractor to develop and implement a project and site specific Safety and Health Management Plan
Based on Safety & Health Specification (SPEC-0031)
Covers work both at Contractor’s facility and at Site
Safety was covered on day 1 of the review…Safety was covered on day 1 of the review…
31. Quality Assurance Requirements Quality Assurance & Management plan is requirement of Contract
Requirements for this plan are spelled out in ATST Quality Management for TMA document
A QA/QC officer is required by Contract