270 likes | 420 Views
INSTITUTE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING SEISMOLOGY (IZIIS) University “SS. Cyril and Methodius” Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
E N D
INSTITUTE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERINGAND ENGINEERING SEISMOLOGY (IZIIS)University “SS. Cyril and Methodius”Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESMENT BASED ON STRONGMOTION INSTRUMENTATIONbyDr. DIMITAR JURUKOVSKIUniversity professorDiscussion presented on"Vulnerability of Buildings"Workshop held March 03-065,2003ISPRA, ItalyOrganized by Secretariat of EUR-OPA Major Hazard AgreementCouncil of Europe
HISTORY OF SMI OF BUILDINGS • OBJECTIVES • PRACTICE • Site Seismicity • Building Geometry • Soil Conditions • Structural System • Cost of Instrumentation • RILEM INITIATIVE FOR ESTABLISHING OF • RILEM SLB-61 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
Fig. 1. Suggested scheme for soil structure interaction instrumentation for frame structure Fig. 2. Suggested scheme for for soil structure interaction for shear wall structures
Fig. 3. Suggested instrumentation of moment resistant structure approximately square in the plan
Fig. 4. Suggested instrumentation of moment resistant rectangular in the plan
Fig. 5. Suggested instrumentation of a frame structure with shear walls or core
Fig. 5. Suggested instrumentation of a frame structure with shear walls or core for rectangular shape plan
Fig. 7. Suggested instrumentation of a shear wall or large panel structure approximately square in plan
Fig. 8. Suggested instrumentation of the roof on the shear wall or large panel structure (a:b = 2:1 – 3:1 3 strong motion instruments) (a:b > 3:1 5 strong motion instruments)
DAMAGE ASSESMENT BASED ON STRONG MOTION RECORDS • CAPACITY CURVES ESTIMATION FOR NON-LINEAR STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR • SYSTEM INDENTIFICATION MODELING • FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD ANALYSIS • WAVE PROPAGATION ANALYSIS
Capacity curve Shear Base (%) UT/H (%) Real earthquake response Ductility (m) DUCTILITY curve UT/H (%)
Damage states N – None S – Slight M – Moderate E – Extensive C – Complete Estimation of Performance Point and Fragility of Building Fragility curves Damage probability matrix
ANALYSIS OF STRONG MOTION DATA • DATA PROCESSING • SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION • DAMAGE DETECTION TIME DOMAIN SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FREQUENCY DOMAIN
WHAT WE KNOW • Structure Structural System and Material • Earthquake Input and Earthquake Response at some levels
SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION • SELECTION OF MATHEMATICAL MODEL • SELECTION POF VECTOR OF VARIABLE PARAMETERS (Model parameters) • EVALUATION OF MATCHING PROCEDURE FOR ADJUSTMENT OF MODEL'S RESPONSE AND RECODED RESPONSE
IDENTIFICATION OF MODEL PARAMETERS • DETERMINISTIC APPROACH • PROBABILISTIC • Maximum likelihood, or • Bayesian identification QUALITY OF IDENTIFICATION IS A FUNCTION OF COMPLEXITY OF THE MODEL
SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION BASED ON SMR (1) (2)MATHEMATICAL MODELING
SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION BASED ON SMR (3)VECTOR OF UNKNOWN VARIABLES (PARAMETERS) - Damping parameters - Non-linear behaviour parameters - Material properties - Other parameters
SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION BASED ON SMR (4)CRITERION FUNCTION (5)Selection the algorithm for minimizing of (4) and calculation of vector {b} (6)Calculation of the responses of the structures:
SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION BASED ON SMR (7)Analysis of the Damage • Wave propagation • Inter-story drift • Shear Base • Overturning • Other techniques
By EC8 • LEVEL I, simple and quick (time requirement for assessment less than one hour per building), suitable for determining risk for a large number of buildings. Only general building data – such as the age and type of building – is taken into account at this level • LEVEL II, detailed and more time-consuming (time requirement for assessment in order of half a day per building). At this level, a number of measurements of the building's properties (e.g. natural frequencies, building height, cross-sections of the shear walls, etc.) may also be required. • LEVEL III, significantly more precise, but very time-consuming (time requirement for assessment can run into several days or weeks for each building). At this level, a precise analysis of the load-bearing structure is carried out using all building data. All key geometric and mechanical building properties are determined and included in the model.
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 By EC8 Light Moderate Moderate Light Moderate Moderate
CONCLUSIONS • TECHNOLOGY FOR DAMAGE ASSESSMENT BASED ON: • WAVE PROPAGATION PATTERN • SHEAR BASE RATIO • INTER-STORY DRIFT • INCREASING OF FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD • OVERTURNING
CONCLUSIONS • FOR RAPID ASSESSMENT A DATA BASE AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE SHOULD BE CREATED IN TERMS OF: • TYPOLOGY OF STRUCTURE • DATA FOR ALL INSTRUMENTED BUILDINGS • MONITORING AND TELEMETRIC SYSTEM • DATA BASE FOR EVALUATED MATHEMATICAL MODELS FROM SIMPLE TO COMPLEX ONE • TECHNOLOGY FOR DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
CONCLUSIONS • TO CONCENTRATE ON THE MOST VITAL SYSTEMS: SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS, AND OTHER VITAL PUBLIC SYSTEMS • TO MONITOR A CERTAIN NUMBER OF THIS BUILDINGS IN A HIGH SEISMICITY REGION WITH TELEMETRIC COMMUNICATION TO A RELEVANT CENTRES • TO EVALUATE CONCISTENT PROCEDURE FOR DAMAGE ASSESMENT, CREATION OF A DATA BASES AND DESSIMINATION