200 likes | 310 Views
Outcome of diabetic pregnancy Comparison of North East England with Norway. December 2000 Gillian Hawthorne. Dr Hawthorne. Consultant Diabetologist based at Newcastle Diabetes Centre, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Interested in diabetic pregnancy since 1990
E N D
Outcome of diabetic pregnancyComparison of North East England with Norway December 2000 Gillian Hawthorne
Dr Hawthorne • Consultant Diabetologist based at Newcastle Diabetes Centre, Newcastle-upon-Tyne • Interested in diabetic pregnancy since 1990 • Studied with David Hadden, Belfast and Lois Jovanovic, New York
St Vincent’s declaration • Achieve pregnancy outcome in the diabetic woman that approximates that of the non diabetic woman
Norway Bergen Medical birth registry
Northern Diabetic Pregnancy Survey • Prospective population based survey • Perinatal mortality for diabetic pregnancy 48/1000 compared to background of 8.9/1000 • Congenital malformation rate for diabetic pregnancy 83/1000 compared to 21.3/1000
Diabetic Pregnancy outcome for the UK Perinatal Mortality Birth Defect per 1000 Diabetes Background Diabetes Background Merseyside 1990-94 36.1 7.6 9.7% Northern Ireland 37 N/A 5%
Perinatal Deaths in Norway 1987-1996 • Perinatal deaths in diabetic pregnancy • 11.8 per 1000 • Perinatal deaths in non-diabetic pregnancy • 6.7 per 1000 • Perinatal deaths = stillbirth at 28 completed weeks or neonatal death <7th day of life
Aim of study • To determine if the difference in diabetic pregnancy outcome between Norway and North East England can be explained by procedural differences: • Are there differences in recording data? • Are the differences in recorded outcome real?
Methods • All data collected prospectively between 1st July 1994 and 30th June 1997 • In Norway compulsory notification of all pregnancies with gestational age of 16 completed weeks or more • In north East England notification of all diabetic pregnancy to Northern Diabetic pregnancy Survey
Standardisation of definitions • Stillbirths defined as all fetal deaths more than 24 completed weeks • Perinatal mortality all stillbirths >24 completed weeks and all live births • Congenital anomalies coded using ICD 8
Terminations for birth defects included in both numerators and denominators • Relative risks approximated by odds ratio
Perinatal Mortality in North East England Total Number Perinatal Deaths Perinatal mortality /1000 With diabetes 304 13 42.8 Without diabetes 101516 1014 10.0 Relative risk 4.4 [2.5-7.7]
Perinatal mortality in Norway Total Number Perinatal Deaths Perinatal mortality /1000 With diabetes 2019 21 10.4 Without diabetes 179754 178542 6.7 Relative risk 1.5 CI [0.97-2.3]
Birth Defects in North East England Total Number Birth Defects Birth Defects /1000 Babies of: Mothers with diabetes 309 17 55.0 Mothers without diabetes 101755 2472 24.3 Relative risk 2.5 CI [1.5-4.0]
Birth defects in Norway Total Number Birth Defects Birth Defects /1000 Babies of: Mothers with diabetes 2019 58 28.7 Mothers without diabetes 179754 5465 30.4 Relative risk 0.95 CI [0.73-1.2]
Summary • In North East England - • The perinatal mortality for offspring of mothers with diabetes was 42.8/1000 - a 4 fold increase in risk compared to offspring of mothers without diabetes • The risk of birth defects was 2.5 fold increased
Summary • In Norway • Perinatal mortality was 10.4/1000 for offspring of mothers with diabetes- 1.5 fold increase compared to offspring of mothers without diabetes • Risk of birth defects for offspring of mothers with diabetes was 0.95
Relative risks between North East England and Norway • The differences were significant [p=0.0002] for the relative risk of perinatal mortality adjusted for maternal age • The differences were significant [p=0.0008] for relative risks for birth defect adjusted for maternal age
Conclusion • In Norway the outcome of diabetic pregnancy is similar to that of the background population • Diabetic pregnancy remains high risk in North East England • Further research is required to understand what is the cause of this difference