210 likes | 401 Views
Questions for Discussion. Should/How Can /Do SG's support:User generated content?User/third-party integration of services/capability?Manual/automatic workflow, orSingle-user gateways (MyPage)Work across gateways/between gateways and local resources?SSODataProvenanceWorkflowDevelopment Scal
E N D
1. Gateways and Cyberenvironments and Web 2.0Jim Myers (jimmyers@ncsa.uiuc.edu)Marlon Pierce (mpierce@cs.indiana.edu) Web 2.0 and Cyberenvironments both support the idea of user-generated content and user/third-part integration of services/capabilities. In this BOF we'll discuss the relevance of this concept to Gateways cyberinfrastructure. We'll also exchange information about technologies, current efforts, and interests as well as brainstorm about potential follow-on activities.
5 minutes Welcome/Introductions
5 Minutes: What's possible with Web 2.0 - Marlon
5 minutes: What's possible in Cyberenvironments - Jim
10 minutes: What's being done in currently in Gateway projects: Open Discussion
15 minutes: What are the compelling use cases w.r.t. Teragrid and Cyberinfrastructure for research and education: Open Discussion
15 minutes: Discussion of current best practices, interest, and potential follow-on activities: Open Discussion
2. Questions for Discussion Should/How Can /Do SGs support:
User generated content?
User/third-party integration of services/capability?
Manual/automatic workflow, or
Single-user gateways (MyPage)
Work across gateways/between gateways and local resources?
SSO
Data
Provenance
Workflow
Development Scaling / Composable Software
3. National Center for Supercomputing Applications Amdahls Law for Scientific Progress:
4. National Center for Supercomputing Applications Cyberenvironments Supporting the Research Lifecycle
5. National Center for Supercomputing Applications AJAX and Mashup with Google Map
6. Earthquake Engineering on YouTube
National Center for Supercomputing Applications
7. Š
8. Š Connotea social bookmarking
9. Š
11. Web 2.0 and Grids Comparison Marlon Pierce, Geoffrey Fox
Community Grids Lab
Indiana University
12. The Ten areas covered by the 60 core WS-* Specifications
13. WS-* Areas and Web 2.0
14. Other Parallels Groups:
Virtual Organizations: work best for merging real organizations and enterprises
Social Networks: work best as emergent groups of individual users.
Metadata and information management
Semantic Web: RDF, OWL, ontologies
Web 2.0: Folksonomies, microformats
15. National Center for Supercomputing Applications MAEViz an Example Cyberenvironment(Consequence-Based Risk Management for Seismic Events)
16. Other Eclipse RCP Cyberenvironments Haystack, DASH, BioDASH
CI-Shell
Some Gateways?
17. National Center for Supercomputing Applications Content Aware
ARKs, DOI, LSID
WebDAV, JCR, RDF, SAM, Tupelo
18. National Center for Supercomputing Applications Process Aware
Workflow, Provenance, RDF
19. National Center for Supercomputing Applications Group/VO Aware
Collaboratory, Portal,
20. National Center for Supercomputing Applications Dynamic
Plug-ins, WSRP, Provenance
21. Resources Some tutorial slides and a white paper are available at http://www.servogrid.org/slide/iSERVO/Web20/ if you want more background on Web 2.0. Geoffrey Fox also has several very good presentations at http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu/ptliupages/presentations/.
Cyberenvironments: http://cet.ncsa.uiuc.edu/CEResources/
22. Questions for Discussion Should/How Can /Do SGs support:
User generated content?
User/third-party integration of services/capability?
Manual/automatic workflow, or
Single-user gateways (MyPage)
Work across gateways/between gateways and local resources?
SSO
Data
Provenance
Workflow
Development Scaling / Composable Software