1 / 19

Organizational Institutionalism Chapter 26

Organizational Institutionalism Chapter 26. Institutional-level Learning: Learning as a Source of Institutional Change. Authors. Pamela Haunschild Ph.D. from Carnegie Mellon, 1992 Prior postings: Stanford, UW-Madison Currently Chair of Management at UT-Austin

liluye
Download Presentation

Organizational Institutionalism Chapter 26

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Organizational InstitutionalismChapter 26 Institutional-level Learning: Learning as a Source of Institutional Change

  2. Authors • Pamela Haunschild • Ph.D. from Carnegie Mellon, 1992 • Prior postings: Stanford, UW-Madison • Currently Chair of Management at UT-Austin • Interested in: Org behavior, org design, org change • David Chandler • Ph.D. candidate at UT-Austin • Under research interests, he has a quote: “Economics is all about how people make choices; sociology is all about how they don’t have any choices to make.” – Dusenberry 1960 • He is interested in ethics, CSR, and stakeholder theory

  3. Economic Benefit vs. Institutional Pressures • Past theories tend to assume companies adopt new practices for one of two reasons: • Economic benefit: early adoption of new cost-saving or sales-promoting techniques lead companies to change the way they do things • Institutional pressure: the threat of losing legitimacy compels companies to “follow the crowd” regardless of the efficiency or cost concerns related • Organizational Learning theorists suggest these are too exclusive

  4. Organizational Learning • This chapter tries to bridge past theories to show how organizations can adopt practices later but still do so for economic benefit • Wal-Mart Example

  5. Definitions of Organizational Learning • Huber 1991: • “An entity learns if, through its processing of information, the range of its potential behaviors is changed.” • Levitt and March 1988: • Organizations are “seen as learning by encoding inferences from history into routines that guide behavior.”

  6. Organizational Learning • Huber’s Four constructs • Knowledge acquisition • Information distribution • Information interpretation • Organizational memory • Keys from both definitions: • Routines are independent of individual actors • They change based on interpretations of past • They change as new experiences accumulate • Learning and change are intertwined

  7. Levels of Analysis • Past research has examined individual, group, and organizational levels, but little has examined field-level learning • Institutional theory has started to incorporate other levels – change driven from below – while learning literature has considered more field-level learning – change driven from above • The chapter focuses on learning that speaks to the field/institutional level

  8. Processes of Change • Inertia has limited change to path-dependent processes • Neo-institutionalists suggest change occurs in punctuated leaps, rather than over time • Learning theorists suggest it occurs slowly over time through experience and adaptation • The institutional and learning literatures have begun to overlap by acknowledging institutional learning and individual actor agency

  9. Institutional Theory and Change • Neoinstitutionalists have begun to consider that 1) institutions can change and 2) consider the conditions under which it occurs • Institutionalization is a process that includes emergence, diffusion, change, deinstitutionalization, and the emergence of new institutions

  10. Institutional Change • The evolving area of institutional change has created doubt about the permanence of institutions, and therefore created the possibility of deinstitutionalizaation • This concept gave rise to the notion that institutions require reinforcement to survive

  11. Sources of Institutional Change • Exogenous sources of change • Influence of institutional and technical forces in the environment • Incomplete institutionalization • Shocks that alter the firm’s environment • Endogenous sources of change • Individual actors • Forces of interest, agency, and institutional entrepreneurship

  12. Institutional Level Learning • Six key areas within learning theory: • The role of unintended consequences • The role of learning processes and field-level change • The role of search: exploration vs. exploitation • The role of forgetting (unlearning, disadoption, and deinstitutionalization) • The roles of selective and inferential learning • The role of heterogeneity vs. homogeneity

  13. The Role of Unintended Consequences • Unplanned institutional change caused by deliberate action • Example: the importance of performance measures to manager pay leads to a focus on measurement improvement over actual improvement • What does this concept suggest about institutional theory? • Institutions might not automatically reproduce themselves • Intended action is not the only source of change

  14. The Role of Learning Processes and Field-level Change • Organizations exhibit evidence of having learned routines and practices, both from other firms and within the general population • Example: firms may learn from firms with which they share a connection such industry associations • What are the implications for Institutional Theory from this concept? • Previously unaccounted for contextual factors may play an important role in the spread of institutional practices • Example: imperfectly imitating Toyota

  15. The Role of Search:Exploration vs. Exploitation • Exploration: search directed toward new knowledge and competencies • Tends to produce more dramatic and varied change • Examples: HIV/AIDS treatment, green movement • Often related to higher risk without guarantees of higher reward • Exploitation: search directed toward better utilization of existing competencies • More common • Faster feedback, better short-term results

  16. The Role of Forgetting • Unlearning • Disadoption • Deinstitutionalization

  17. The Roles of Selective and Inferential Learning • Firms may adopt practices later and cherry-pick the best practices rather than go through the difficulties of first movers • Contradicts present theory that suggests firms adopt practices regardless of economic performance to maintain legitimacy • Example: adopting green technologies only after benefits were exhibited by earlier entrants • Fields can learn from other fields • Example: Korean firms adopting Japanese and U.S. practices in the semiconductor industry

  18. The Roles of Heterogeneity vs. Homogeneity • Different strategic responses can lead to greater heterogeneity within a field • Three field level conditions that can lead to heterogeneous responses: • Imperfect copying • Regulatory pressures • Competition

  19. Big Questions • Why do organizations exist? • Why do some organizations survive and others don’t? • How and why do organizations differ? • How and why do organizations change? • What are the emerging issues?

More Related