1 / 1

Effect of Word Frequency on Tonal Variation Yuan Zhao, Dan Jurafsky Stanford University

ABSTRACT

lin
Download Presentation

Effect of Word Frequency on Tonal Variation Yuan Zhao, Dan Jurafsky Stanford University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ABSTRACT We show that lexical frequency is an important source of tonal variation. Words of low (corpus) frequency are produced with higher f0 than high-frequency words of the same tone. Our results suggest that phonetic context is not the only source of tonal variation. Surface realization of tone is also affected by lexical factors like word frequency. RESULTS Low-frequency words have higher f0 Frequency effect is on mid-tones Tone3 (mid-level): LF 11.7 Hz higher than HF words (F (1,7) = 25.115, p<.002); Tone5 (mid/low-rising): LF 7.5 Hz higher than HF words (F (1,7) = 12.505, p<.010). Frequency effect not constant during word Lexical frequency starts influencing tonal variation only 50% of the way through the word, (no significant effect on tone production at beginning of word) Effect of Word Frequency on Tonal VariationYuan Zhao, Dan JurafskyStanford University INTRODUCTION • Background: We know lexical frequency influences segmental realization: • LF words: fuller vowels (Fidelholtz, Rhodes, Bybee, etc) • LF words: expanded vowel space (Munson 200) • Question: Does lexical frequency influence the surface realization of tones? • Hypothesis I:HF and LF words of the same lexical tone will be produced at different pitch (f0). • Hypothesis II:Tonal contrast among close competing tones will increase when speakers produce LF words (vide Lindblom H&H) DATA • Test Language: Cantonese (6-tones) • Materials: 90 HF and LF monosyllabic word pairs • Balanced for tones and segmental content • Above 6 on familiarity scale • Frequency: mean HF= 3.66; mean LF=0.97 • Speaker: 8 Hong Kong Cantonese speakers • Measurement: f0 value at 10 equidistant points Tonal contrast of LF words increases Tonal Distance= F0 of six tones CONCLUSIONS • There is systematic subphonemic variation in tone production due to the lexical status of words • LF words are produced at higher f0 than HF words of the same tone • Lexical frequency doesn’t start influencing tone production until half way through the word • Clearer tone production of LF words: tonal contrast of LF words is larger than that of HF words;

More Related