1 / 50

Ozgur Ates Hampton University

Ozgur Ates Hampton University. TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design” And OLYMPUS Experiment “Study of Systematics”. The Hadron Hall at J-PARC. Secondary lines for  + , K + , or p beam. Secondary lines for  - , K - , or p beam. 50 GeV/c proton beam to primary production target.

lin
Download Presentation

Ozgur Ates Hampton University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ozgur AtesHampton University TREK Experiment“Tracking and Baseline Design” And OLYMPUS Experiment “Study of Systematics”

  2. The Hadron Hall at J-PARC Secondary lines for +, K+, or p beam Secondary lines for -, K-, or p beam 50 GeV/c proton beam to primary production target

  3. Time Reversal violation Experiment with Kaons: Search for New Physics beyond the Standard Model by Measurement of T-violating Transverse Muon Polarization in K+ μ+π0 νμ Decays New official website: http://trek.kek.jp

  4. Planar GEMs“C1”between CsI and C2, or in replacement of C2 • Cylindrical device “C0” • in replacement of C1

  5. C1: Planar GEMs for TREK • “C1”To cover CsI gaps on the outside

  6. Target andTracking • Addition of C0 and C1 • GEM chambers with • -high position resolution • - higher rateperformance • Larger C3-C4 • distance • Use of He bags E246 J-PARC • Better kinematical resolution • New target

  7. Upgraded Trek Detector Apparatus

  8. Geant4 Simulation • GOALS: • Realistic geometry of upgraded TREK apparatus • Realistic tracking performance Obtain design criteria for • Sizes and locations of new elements • Angular and spatial resolution of tracks at detector elements • Which spatial detector resolution is adequate? • Optimization of material budget

  9. Geant4 Simulation • Got started with • Geometry of Sci. target + C0 + C1 + C2, coded materials • Full cylinders of target and C0 but only one of 12 sectors for C1,C2 • Generate monoenergetic 100 MeV muonsuniformly distributed over volume of targetwithopening angle according to muon gap size. • Produce hits in detector elements of C0, C1, C2 • Use multiple scattering or physics off • Record hits along track and write set of variables (th, ph, z, y, p, edep. mom, etc.) to ROOT TREE

  10. Root Analyses • Studied acceptance of tracks in C0, C1, C2. • From this study,determined required geometric sizes of C0 and C1. • Found out that; • Length of C0 should be: 300 mm • Width of C1 should be: 200 mm • Length of C1 should be: 480 mm

  11. Determination of Length of C0

  12. Determination of Width of C1

  13. Determination of Length of C1

  14. Straight-Line Fit in 3D • Recorded hit locations of Readout layers of C0, C1 and C2. • Appliedstraight-line fit in 3D for each generated event. • Reconstruct straight track from recorded hits with 3D straight-line fit • Recorded fit parameters for each track, and locations of fitted trackat each 3 readout layers. • Closest distance of reconstructed track to origin of generated track (vertex difference)(1st column) • Difference of generated hit position at detectors(C0,C1,C2) and that of the recons. track (2nd to 4th column)

  15. RESIDUALS

  16. Systematic Study of Resolution

  17. OLYMPUS Exp.: The contribution of multiple photon exchange in elastic lepton-nucleon scattering • Study of Elastic Scattering of Electrons and Positrons • Luminosity Monitors • Systematic Study of Resolutions • Monte Carlo Studies and Root Analysis

  18. Proton Form Factor Ratio Jefferson Lab • All Rosenbluth data from SLAC and Jlab in agreement • Dramatic discrepancy between Rosenbluth and recoil polarization technique • Multi-photon exchange considered best candidate Dramatic discrepancy!

  19. Luminosity Monitors: Telescopes Proposed version included in OLYMPUS TDR Sept. 2009 2 tGEM telescopes, 1.2msr, 12o, R=187/237/287cm, dR=50cm, 3 tracking planes Forward telescopes 12o TOF • Geant4 simulation to optimize vertex resolution, solid angle and noise

  20. Triple Super Ratio Ratio of luminosities Ratio of acceptances (phase space integrals) Ratio of counts • Separately determine three super ratios • Blinding of final result until put together • Left-right symmetry = redundancy

  21. Forward Elastic Luminosity Monitor • Forward-angle electron/positron telescopes with good angular and vertex resolution • Coincidence with proton in opposite sector of main detector • Single-arm tracks • Two telescopes with 3 triple-GEM detectors, left-right symmetric • High rate capability • GEM technology MIT protoype: Telescope of 3 Triple GEM prototypes (10 x 10 cm2) using TechEtch foils F. Simon et al., NIM A598 (2009) 432

  22. Study of Elastic Scattering

  23. Study of Elastic Scattering • FOUR VECTORS: • e=(E,Pe) E^2= (me^2) + (Pe^2) • e’=(E’,Pe’) E’=|Pe’| and E=|Pe| • p=(M,0), E=2 GeV and M=0.938 GeV • p’=(Ep,Pp) • CONSERVATION LAWS: Energy: E – E’ = Ep – M Transverse : E’ Sin(Te)=Pp Sin(Tp) Longitudinal: E – E’Cos(Te)=Pp Cos(Tp) *** Ep^2= Pp^2+M^2

  24. Study of Elastic Scattering • We have 4 variables: Pe, Pp, Te, Tp • 3 constraints: 3 conservation equations • 4 - 3= 1 (DEGREE OF FREEDOM) • Then I can find out 12 Different Relations: • Pp(Tp) inverse Tp(Pp) • Pe(Te) inverse Te(Pe) • Pp(Te) inverse Te(Pp) • Tp(Te) inverse Te(Tp) • Pp(Pe) inverse Pe(Pp) • Tp(Pe) inverse Pe(Tp)

  25. PeTp: Data Points(Pe:Tp) and Calculation(PeTp)

  26. TpTe: Data Points(Tp:Te) and Calculation(TpTe)

  27. Residuals: G4_Pe – Calc_PePp(G4_Pp)

  28. Residuals: G4_Tp – Calc_TpTe(G4_Te)

  29. Study of Resolutions • For Proton Left Sector: • Vertex Resolution in Z axis: 0.8 mm • Polar Angle Resolution (Theta): 0.09 Degree • Azimuthal Angle Resolution(Phi): 0.14 Degree • Momentum Resolution: 36 MeV • For Electron Left Sector: • Vertex Resolutions in Z axis: 0.6 mm • Polar Angle Resolutions (Theta): 0.08 D • Azimuthal Angle Resolution(Phi): 0.10 Degree • Momentum Resolution: 36 MeV

  30. What is Next? Montecarlo Studies • Study of Systematics • Further (small) corrections for individual acceptances • Effects by backgrounds and inefficiencies • Effects from beam sizes, slopes and offsets • Construction of GEM LAB@HU!!!!!

  31. Extra Slides

More Related