1 / 7

Focus Groups!

Focus Groups!. A Brief PowerPoint Alana McMains, Jeffrey Kaplan, Kevin Awakuni, Chase McMunn, and Tony Aponte. 5 Assumptions (Lederman). People = valuable info sources People = capable articulators Facilitator  puts “focus” in focus group Group dynamics ≠ “group think”

linus
Download Presentation

Focus Groups!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Focus Groups! A Brief PowerPoint Alana McMains, Jeffrey Kaplan, Kevin Awakuni, Chase McMunn, and Tony Aponte

  2. 5 Assumptions (Lederman) • People = valuable info sources • People = capable articulators • Facilitator  puts “focus” in focus group • Group dynamics ≠ “group think” • Interviewing group > interviewing individuals

  3. 10 Essential Ingredients (Axelrod) • Clearly understood objective • Homogeneity • Good recruiting • Relaxed atmosphere • Moderator who listens

  4. 10 Essential Ingredients (Axelrod) 6. Well-prepared moderator 7. Free-flowing dialogue 8. Restrained group influence 9. Skilled analysis 10. Competent researchers

  5. Advantages of Focus Groups • Less inhibited participants • Flexibility • Handling contingencies • Time • Interpretability of data • Provision of basic exploratory info

  6. Disadvantages of Focus Groups • Cost • Subject’s conformity • Biased results • Generalization issues

  7. How fascinating! I must learn more. • Byer, Peggy Yuhas, and James R. Wilcox.  “Focus Groups: A Qualitative Opportunity for Researchers.”  The Journal of Business Communication 28, no.  1 (Winter 1991): 63-78.

More Related