1 / 37

FLOOD STUDY Union County, NJ

FLOOD STUDY Union County, NJ. FEMA REGION II August 24, 2011 2:00pm. Agenda . Introductions National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) FEMA Strategic Plan & Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) Goals Risk MAP Program Overview Meeting Objectives

liona
Download Presentation

FLOOD STUDY Union County, NJ

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FLOOD STUDYUnion County, NJ FEMA REGION II August 24, 2011 2:00pm

  2. Agenda • Introductions • National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) • FEMA Strategic Plan & Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) Goals • Risk MAP Program Overview • Meeting Objectives • Current Status of Union County Flood Study • Risk Assessment • Community Engagement • Questions

  3. Introductions • Local – Union County (Host) & Communities • State – New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) Senior Engineer: Kunal Patel GIS 3: Chris Gould, CFM Principal Engineer:Tom Slowinski • FEMA Region II Risk Analysis Branch Chief: ScottDuell Risk Analysis Risk Assessment Lead/Senior Engineer: Alan Springett Risk Analysis Branch Senior Planner: Cathleen Carlisle Communications and Outreach Lead: William McDonnell Study Project Manager:Paul Weberg, PE Floodplain Management and Insurance Lead: Kim Rizzo Regional Support Center Outreach Lead: Crystal Smith, CFM

  4. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) • The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 created the Federal Insurance Administration to: • Identify flood-prone areas within the U.S. • Establish flood-risk zones within those areas • Provides flood insurance only IF the community participates in NFIP • Participating communities agree to adopt and enforce ordinances that meet or exceed FEMA’s requirement • The program goal is to reduce the risk of flooding losses

  5. “The Three-Legged Stool” • The NFIP balances three related program areas • Flood Hazard Identification (Mapping) 2. Floodplain Management (Regulations such as building codes And zoning) 3. Flood Insurance (Provision of Flood Insurance for Property owners in participating Communities)

  6. Floodplain Management • Prevent increases in flood losses • Regulations, zoning ordinances & building codes • Reduce the flood risk to existing development • Disaster preparedness • Flood Insurance • Emergency Plans • Structural Measures (dams, reservoirs, dikes, levees & floodwalls) • Preserve and restore natural floodplains • Floodplain, wetland, coastal barrier resources regulations • Development/Redevelopment policies

  7. Union County – NFIP Policies, Claims, Repetitive Losses, CRS

  8. Community Rating System (CRS) • The National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) is a voluntary incentive program that recognizes and encourages community floodplain management activities that exceed minimum NFIP requirements • As a result, flood insurance premium rates are discounted to reflect the reduced flood risk resulting from community actions meeting the three goals of the CRS: • Reduce flood losses; • Facilitate accurate insurance rating; and • Promote awareness of flood insurance

  9. Premium Discount Class Points SFHA Non‑SFHA 1 4,500 + 45% 10% 2 4,000 - 4499 40% 10% 3 3,500 - 3999 35% 10% 4 3,000 - 3499 30% 10% 5 2,500 - 2999 25% 10% 6 2,000 – 2499 20% 10% 7 1,500 - 1999 15% 5% 8 1,000 - 1499 10% 5% 9 500 – 999 5% 5% 10 0 - 499 0 0

  10. FEMA Strategic Plan & Risk MAP Goals • FEMA Strategic Plan Goals 2008-2013 • Lead an integrated approach that strengthens the Nation’s ability to address disasters, emergencies, and terrorist events • Deliver easily accessible and coordinated assistance for all programs • Provide reliable information at the right time for all users • FEMA invests in people and people invest in FEMA to ensure mission success • Build public trust and confidence through performance and stewardship • FEMA Risk MAP Goals • Collaboration with Federal, State and local stakeholders to achieve goals under Risk MAP: • Address gaps in flood hazard data • Public Awareness/Outreach • Hazard Mitigation Planning • Enhanced Digital Platform • Alignment and Synergies

  11. Guiding Principles • Engage communities early and often • Agree upon and document project outcomes and responsibilities • Coordinate with other programs operating within the same community • Leverage associations to provide a third-party perspective • Use local media and language that people understand

  12. Risk MAP Program Overview

  13. Risk MAP Vision • Through collaboration with State, Tribal, and local entities, Risk MAP will deliver quality data that increases public awareness and leads to action that reduces risk to life and property. • Risk MAP will focus on products and services beyond the traditional Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). • FEMA will work with officials to help use flood risk data and tools to effectively communicate risk to citizens and enable communities to enhance their corresponding mitigation plans.

  14. FEMA’s FY10 Flood Mapping Progress Report and Production Plan • With FY2009 and FY2010 Congressional appropriations for Flood Hazard Mapping, FEMA is conducting flood map update projects: • Improve engineering and mapping for high flood risk areas affected by coastal flooding, levees, and other riverine flood hazards • Leverage established Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP) relationships and resources • To learn more, see the FEMA’s FY10 Flood Mapping Progress Report and Production Plan on www.fema.gov

  15. Recent Activities • Introduction to Risk MAP - Face to Face • Initial meetings conducted – via Webinar: • July, 2011 • Cape May, Atlantic, Ocean, Monmouth • August, 2011 • Middlesex, Union, Hudson, Essex • 2010 • April - Morris • June – Bergen, Somerset • July - Essex • August – Monmouth, Union • September - Cape May • October – Passaic, Middlesex • November – Atlantic • December – Ocean • 2011 • February – Cumberland, Salem • June – Cumberland, Union • July - Cape May, Atlantic, Ocean, Monmouth

  16. Meeting Objectives • Engage Union County and communities and promote local residents to reduce their vulnerability to risk • Provide information to local officials to help them communicate flood risk to residents and businesses • Provide an update on the current status of Union County’s Flood Study • Encourage partnerships and collaborations to leverage and advance risk management and mitigation measures

  17. Union County Flood Study -Overview • Project Team • Local Officials • New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (Cooperating Technical Partner) • FEMA • Risk Assessment, Mapping, and Planning Partners (RAMPP), a joint venture of Dewberry, URS, and ESP • Regional Support Center (RSC) • Regional Program Management Lead

  18. Union County Flood Study - Scope • Incorporation of approximately 4 miles of detailed analysis for the Elizabeth River • Restudy of all coastal hazard zones • Incorporation of NJFHA boundary to the DFIRM maps and Flood Insurance Report (FIS) profiles for the Elizabeth River • All the coastal and riverine analysis will be produced in the FEMA Countywide format in the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) • NAVD 88 = NGVD 29 – 1.1 feet Datum Conversion for Union County Elevation in NGVD 29 Elevation in NAVD 88 897.1’ NGVD 29 896’ NAVD 88 895.1’ NGVD 29 894’ NAVD 88

  19. Milestones • Coastal Surge Study complete: October, 2011 • Coastal Overland wave analysis complete: January, 2012 • Coastal and Riverine Analysis complete: Mid 2012 • Preliminary Flood Study: June 2012

  20. Union County Flood Study - Update On the Current Status • Acquisition of the effective countywide mapping data has been completed • Field survey for the approximately 4 miles of detailed analysis for Elizabeth River has been completed. Hydrology and Hydraulics processes are under way. • Coastal storm surge analysis is underway. Preliminary transect layout, field survey and obstruction carding have been completed. • Awaiting response from communities to the letters sent out in November, 2009 and January, 2010 regarding data request

  21. Union County Flood Study - Paneling Scheme • Restudy of all coastal hazard zones and Elizabeth River

  22. Local Communities – Data Gathering • Local technical data availability? • Bridge replacements; new storm water management systems; new H&H studies; new aerial photography and/or topographic information, etc. • Contacted each community letting them know about field surveys taking place in their communities back in November, 2009 and data request in January, 2010 • Only response received from City of Linden • Is this an accurate representation of your communities? • Levee impacted areas? • FEMA is exploring more precise approaches for identifying flood hazards in areas impacted by levees

  23. Coastal Storm Surge and Overland Wave Hazard Analysis Overview – Gulf & Atlantic 6. MAPPING 5. RUNUP 4. WAVES 3. EROSION 2. SETUP 1. SURGE

  24. Union County – Transect Layout

  25. Coastal Study Technical Panel • The intent of the technical panel is to engage subject matter experts in coastal engineering analysis process • Meetings were held on: • 4/14/2011 • 5/10/2011 • Members: • Academics and Other Interested Parties: • Stevens Institute of Technology • Richard Stockton College of NJ • City University of New York – Hunter College • Cousteau Institute under Rutgers University • Columbia University • Barnegat Bay Partnership • State and Local Government: • New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation • New York City • Northeast States Emergency Consortium • Other Federal Agencies: • USACE • NOAA • USGS

  26. Risk MAP Risk Assessment Tools & Resources • HAZUS-MH: Estimating potential losses from earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes • New Version 2.0 includes coastal storm surge modeling • For more information and to download the HAZUS-MH software: http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/index.shtm • National Tool: Evaluating appropriate long-term mitigation measures • For more information and to download the National Tool software: http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/floodplain/data_tool.shtm

  27. Risk MAPMitigation Planning • Hazard Mitigation Plans: • Guides your decisions on mitigation activities for all hazards you face • Are an important resource for responding to disasters • Facilitates access to federal assistance for mitigation • We reviewed your mitigation plans and found that: • Union County:2011 Mitigation Plan: • County Approved

  28. Union County, NJ Mitigation Plan Update

  29. Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) • HMA grant programs provide funding for eligible mitigation activities that reduce disaster losses and protect lives and property from future disaster damages • Communities with approved hazard mitigation plans can apply for Federal Assistance • Federal Assistance applications through New Jersey OEM (Bob Little)

  30. Risk Communications • Federal/State/Local goals: • To create safer communities and reduce risk to lives and property • To effectively communicate risk and increase public awareness, leading citizens to make informed decisions regarding their risk • Key factors contributing to successful achievement of these goals are: • Community engagement and exchange of flood risk information • Effective collaboration through partnerships • Strategic communications plan development

  31. Risk Communications • Acknowledgement of the challenges in the complex, multi-disciplinary, multi-dimensional, and evolving processes of risk communications • Conflicting priorities and messages • Difficulty in translating scientific information • Disagreements on what constitutes risk • FEMA created a list of supporting, customizable tools and templates and is currently developing those materials in order of need as identified by FEMA Regions • Region II is waiting on FEMA HQ’s development and outcomes • Region II is initiating its own risk communications strategy

  32. * * - OFA = Other Federal Agencies

  33. Risk CommunicationsNJ Coastal Outreach Strategy • The overarching goal of the New Jersey Coastal Outreach Strategy is to globally increase awareness of, and engagement in, the remapping of NJ coastal counties. • Key themes: • Flood risks have changed in many coastal communities since the date on their effective FIRM panels • When completed, the storm surge study will contain valid, defensible results • Mitigation Planning involves learning about the hazards that can impact a community, setting clear goals to reduce their vulnerability to the identified hazards, and putting in place long-term hazard mitigation strategies • Coordinated, sustained mitigation activities are the best way to ensure your community will be physically, socially, and economically resilient to future natural hazard impacts

  34. Risk Communication StrategyResources • Region III Coastal Website: • www.R3Coastal.com • Region IV Coastal Website: • http://www.southeastcoastalmaps.com • Region VI Coastal Website: • http://www.txchart.com • Region II Coastal Website: • To be announced

  35. Example FEMA Region IIRisk MAP Activities Schedule • Current: August, 2011 • Risk MAP Introduction • October, 2011 • Mitigation Planning • December, 2011 • National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) & Community Rating System (CRS) • February, 2012 • Technical Details of the Study • April, 2012 • Risk Assessment • June, 2012 • Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) • August, 2012 • Risk Communication

  36. Resources • FEMA: www.fema.gov • Floodsmart, the official site of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP): www.floodsmart.gov • Risk Assessment, Mapping and Planning Partners: www.RAMPP-team.com • NFIP Reform: www.fema.gov/business/nfip/nfip_reform.shtm • HAZUS-MH software: http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/index.shtm • National Tool software: http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/floodplain/data_tool.shtm • Hazus User Groups: http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/hz_users.shtm#4 • New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection - NFIP Coordinator • New Jersey State Office of Emergency Management

  37. Questions & Feedback • Please complete your survey. Your feedback is very important to us. • This presentation & hand-outs will be posted at: www.RAMPP-TEAM.com Contact Information • NJDEP John Moyle / Joseph Ruggeri / John Scordato / Tom Slowinski / Chris Gould / Kunal Patel NJDEP, Bureau of Dam Safety & Flood Control Phone: 609-292-2296 NJDEP website: www.nj.gov/dep/floodcontrol • FEMA Risk Analysis Branch Chief: Scott Duell / 212-680-3630 / Scott.Duell@dhs.gov Risk Analysis Risk Assessment Lead/Senior Engineer: Alan Springett / 212-680-8557/ Alan.Springett@dhs.gov Communications and Outreach: William McDonnell / 212-680-3636 / William.McDonnell@dhs.gov Study Project Manager: Paul Weberg / 212-680-3638 / Paul.Weberg@dhs.gov Flood Insurance & Management: Kim Rizzo/ 212-680-3637 / Kim.Rizzo@dhs.gov Mitigation Planning: Cathleen Carlisle / 212-680-8529 / Cathleen.Carlisle@dhs.gov HAZUS & GIS: Brian Shumon / 212-680-3631 / Brian.Shumon@dhs.gov Regional Support Center Coordinator: Andrew Martin / 646-216-3677 / Amartin@dewberry.com

More Related