1 / 3

SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}

CD FOLDER STRUCTURE. SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}. SCENARIO 2 {ANALYSIS USING CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC FLOW (LV +HGV)}. 2009. 2007. 2013. 2011. 2009. 2011. 2007. VISUM. HCS. VISUM. HCS. OTHER FILES. OTHER FILES. OTHER FILES. OTHER FILES. SIDRA. VISUM.

liona
Download Presentation

SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CD FOLDER STRUCTURE SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S} SCENARIO 2 {ANALYSIS USING CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC FLOW (LV +HGV)} 2009 2007 2013 2011 2009 2011 2007 VISUM HCS VISUM HCS OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES SIDRA VISUM SIDRA VISUM VISUM HCS SYNCHRO SYNCHRO HCS HCS OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES Analysis Year Traffic Flow Details Year Details 2007 Traffic Survey Counted Flows 2009 2009 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +40% mall occupancy Traffic 2011 2011 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +100% mall occupancy Traffic 2013 2013 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +Full Development Traffic as per ADM Approved TIS Click on the Folder Name to open corresponding files PDF Copy of Analysis Report

  2. CD FOLDER STRUCTURE SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S} SCENARIO 2 {ANALYSIS USING CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC FLOW (LV +HGV)} 2009 2007 2013 2011 2009 2011 2007 VISUM HCS VISUM HCS OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES SIDRA VISUM SIDRA VISUM VISUM HCS SYNCHRO SYNCHRO HCS HCS OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES Analysis Year Traffic Flow Details Year Details 2007 Traffic Survey Counted Flows 2009 2009 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +40% mall occupancy Traffic 2011 2011 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +100% mall occupancy Traffic 2013 2013 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +Full Development Traffic as per ADM Approved TIS Click on the Folder Name to open corresponding files PDF Copy of Analysis Report

  3. CD FOLDER STRUCTURE SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S} SCENARIO 2 {ANALYSIS USING CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC FLOW (LV +HGV)} 2009 2007 2013 2011 2009 2011 2007 VISUM HCS VISUM HCS OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES SIDRA VISUM SIDRA VISUM VISUM HCS SYNCHRO SYNCHRO HCS HCS OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES Analysis Year Traffic Flow Details Year Details 2007 Traffic Survey Counted Flows 2009 2009 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +40% mall occupancy Traffic 2011 2011 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +100% mall occupancy Traffic 2013 2013 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +Full Development Traffic as per ADM Approved TIS Click on the Folder Name to open corresponding files PDF Copy of Analysis Report

More Related