1 / 20

INCOLAB comparison, preliminary results Gaber Begeš Tallin n , 15. September 2005

INCOLAB. INCOLAB comparison, preliminary results Gaber Begeš Tallin n , 15. September 2005. Introduction. Short overview of the comparison What and How to compare Difficulties Current status Results of the comparison Conclusion of the comparison. Main goals of the comparison

lisandra-lambert
Download Presentation

INCOLAB comparison, preliminary results Gaber Begeš Tallin n , 15. September 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INCOLAB • INCOLAB comparison, • preliminary results • Gaber Begeš • Tallinn, 15. September 2005

  2. Introduction • Short overview of the comparison • What and How to compare • Difficulties • Current status • Results of the comparison • Conclusion of the comparison

  3. Main goals of the comparison • is measurement place (black test corner) comparable? • is Test method / procedure comparable? • is Measurement uncertainty evaluation comparable?

  4. Packages with samples before shipment

  5. Test samples A Test samples B

  6. Temperature artefact

  7. SE EE CZ DK SI NL BG Concept of the comparison SE EE SI CZ DK I. NL BG SE EE II. DK SI CZ NL BG

  8. Preventive actions -compact box with foam inside -fragile - label -warnings for shock sensors -locked box -this side up - label -shock sensors -at each shipment phone contact with DHL courier responsible person -check measurements

  9. One cycle tasks of the LMK for the circulating sample - receive the sample from the DHL - check, if the sample or package is damaged - in a case of any damage take a photo and make a claim to the DHL - test measurements on the sample - comparison to previous measurements - preparing the outgoing and incoming AirwayBills - repackaging of the sample - contact with the DHL to pick up the sample and pay attention to the shipment

  10. Difficulties • Difficulties with the sample A in CZ - the electronics of the comparison sample failed - the sample was changed with the reserve sample • Difficulties with the sample A in NL - the electronics of the comparison sample failed - the sample was changed with the reserve sample • Shipment difficulties

  11. Difficulties

  12. Difficulties

  13. Current status of the comparison

  14. Final results will consist of: • Stability of the temperature artefact • Results of the comparison with the temperature artefact

  15. Stability of the temperature artefact Temperature artefact e= 0.9 Radiation thermometer d = 0.5 m = const.

  16. Stability of the temperature artefact Measurement of temperature artefact at 85 °C, vertical position

  17. Stability of the temperature artefact Stability of the temperature artefact in the worst point of the central part is U95(T) = 0,8 °C

  18. Conclusion • September 2005 conclusion of the comparison • Final analysis of the comparison results • Sending /Receiving the questionnaire - by the end of the 2005 • Analysis of test results and answers

  19. Conclusion • Preparation of the Draft A report of the comparison - in January 2006 (all members check their results) • Correction of possible mistakes and preparation of Draft B – final acceptance upon e-mail approval by all participating laboratories – by the March 2006 • Final report of the comparison publicly presented at the final conference September 2006 • Official final report (Draft B) in advance to all participating laboratories and Incolab partners??

More Related