1 / 24

Summary of Simulations from KIT

Summary of Simulations from KIT. Robert Eber, Martin Printz. Contents. Simulation all carried out with Synopsys Sentaurus Layout Performance Un-irradiated charge collection. Electric Fields – n- bulk before irradiation. Comparing (p90,w20), (p240,w20), (p240,w60), (p90,w60)

lise
Download Presentation

Summary of Simulations from KIT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summary ofSimulationsfrom KIT Robert Eber, Martin Printz

  2. Contents • Simulation all carried out withSynopsysSentaurus • Layout • Performance • Un-irradiatedchargecollection

  3. Electric Fields – n-bulkbeforeirradiation • Comparing(p90,w20), (p240,w20), (p240,w60), (p90,w60) • Highestfieldsforverysmallwidth/pitch • (p90,w60) not converging (too high fields)

  4. P-stop Simulation • P-type sensorsrequirestripisolation– bestconfiguration? • Sensor • Implant 20µm, pitch 90µm • w/p = 0.22 • P-stopimplantmaxconc. 5x1016cm-2 Atoll SimulatedAtollversion P-stopwidthvaryingbetween 4µm and 8µm P-stopdistancebetweennear-strip and half-pitch P-stopwidth Distance = 0 Distance = 1

  5. Electric Field with p-stop • High fieldswithlowdistancetostrip (breakdown) • p-stopat large distancetostripandsmallwidthensuregood HV operation E (V/cm) Strip Strip Potential (V)

  6. Effectsof p-stop on Eta Distribution • P-stopaffectselectricfieldandthereforechargesharingbetweenstrips • Effect on eta (chargesharingbetweenstrips) Eta also depends on oxidecharge (irrad. Sensors) More chargesharingwithhigherirrad. (onlyoxidechargesimulatedhere) CBC: lowerchargesharinggoodforbinaryreadout

  7. Electric Field p-spray • Cut 100nm belowoxide • P-spray conc = 4e15cm-3 • Qox=1e11cm-2 • 200µm ImplantDepth

  8. Irradiated Strip Sensors • Effective Irradiation Model (tunedespeciallyforprotons)

  9. Electric Field atthe Strips – n-bulkF=1e15neq/cm2 Increase in Eworsewithirradiation High Qox Low Qox

  10. Electric Field atthe Strips – n-bulkF=3e14neq/cm2 • Soft breakdown due tovery high electricfieldsatthestripswithhigheroxidecharge

  11. P-bulk

  12. Electric Fields – p-bulk Sensors • Comparisonbetween 320µm and 200µm thick FZ p-bulksensors • Not muchhigherelectricfieldsthanfor 320µm devicesatstrips (centerofstrip) • Higher fields in thebulk • Lowerfieldsforhigheroxidecharge – intrinsicallygood! Higher Qox Higher Qox

  13. Electric Fields atthe Strips – FZ320P • Atlowoxidecharge: Electricfieldsincreasewithfluence • Not critical Alu overhang Strip P-stop

  14. Electric Fields atthe Strips – FZ320P • At high oxidecharge, electricfieldsevenlower… (tbc) Alu overhang Strip P-stop

  15. Electric Fields atthe Strips – FZ200P • 200µmthicksensors • Influenceof p-stopdoping after irradiation: higherfieldsathigherdoping P-stop Alu overhang Strip

  16. Electric Fields atthe Strips – FZ200P • High p-stopdopingand high oxidecharge: very high electricfieldsat p-stop Alu overhang Strip

  17. Summary ofdesign (electricfields) • Beforeirradiation • Larger pitch/widthreduceselectricfieldsbetweenthestrips • P-stopshouldbeplacedawayfromthestrips • Small p-stopwidthforlowerelectricfieldsat p-stop • After irradiation • N-bulksensorsperformworsewithhigheroxidecharge • Electricfields in p-bulksensorslowerwithhigheroxidechargeatthestrips • 200µm thicksensorsshow same behaviouras 320µm • High p-stopdopingmaybeworseafter irradiation?

  18. Performance

  19. Charge Collection Efficiency

  20. Charge Loss between Strips

More Related