1 / 11

ESF in Lithuania 2007-2013 Key results of the Commission Ex-Post Evaluation

ESF in Lithuania 2007-2013 Key results of the Commission Ex-Post Evaluation. Impact of 2007-2013 Structural funds on Lithuanian Economy, People and Quality of life, 23 February 2017 Andris Skrastins Evaluation and Impact Assessment unit, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.

livvy
Download Presentation

ESF in Lithuania 2007-2013 Key results of the Commission Ex-Post Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESF in Lithuania2007-2013Key results of the Commission Ex-Post Evaluation Impact of 2007-2013 Structural funds on Lithuanian Economy, People and Quality of life, 23 February 2017 Andris Skrastins Evaluation and Impact Assessment unit, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion

  2. ESF 2007-2013 spending

  3. As at the end of 2014

  4. Over 1 millionparticipations

  5. Over 1 millionparticipations Participations by policy field

  6. Role of ESF Role of ESF • More than 80% of ALMP financed by ESF • 68 million reallocated to A2E from other activities during programming • Support to disadvantaged groups (including youth) • Increase admin capacity • Reduce burden for business • Support for VET and Higher education programmes • Support for R&D and researchers

  7. By the endof 2014, atleast

  8. Impacts of ESF • √ Strong link to EU2020 • √ Contribution to the various challenges identified by CSR • Expansion of ALMP measures, employment of youth, women, low skilled, long term unemployed and older workers. Quality, relevance of education. Social inclusion. Mobility. • √ Positive impacts • -on reducing early school leaving • -employment of disadvantaged groups • -increasing youth educational attainment level • -the increase in the number of researchers • -the public confidence in the state • NB Lithuania: hardest hit in EU by the crisis. In 2009 GDP fell by 14.8%

  9. Socio-economicindicators

  10. Lessons learned Programming - Flexibility helped to respond to the crisis Implementation • - Targeted interventions (women with more than 2 years outside labour market, youth with no qualifications etc) • - Quality requirements introduced in the public procurement Monitoring – Indicators did not match variety of activities funded Evaluations • - Clear intervention logic (sometimes absent) • - Availability of Micro data for evaluations (burdensome but worthwhile)

  11. Thankyou! For more information on the ESF: • http://europa.eu/!kQ97Hb • ESF Ex-post Evaluation Country report: • http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=16726&langId=en

More Related