1 / 7

Follow-Up and Treatment Subcommittee

Follow-Up and Treatment Subcommittee. Proposed Priorities and Projects May 18, 2012 Carol L. Greene, M.D. Proposed Priorities. SCREENING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Learning from the past to inform future (recurring theme) CLOSING GAPS IN SYSTEMS OF CARE Focus on understanding process

lixue
Download Presentation

Follow-Up and Treatment Subcommittee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Follow-Up and Treatment Subcommittee Proposed Priorities and Projects May 18, 2012 Carol L. Greene, M.D.

  2. Proposed Priorities • SCREENING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION • Learning from the past to inform future (recurring theme) • CLOSING GAPS IN SYSTEMS OF CARE • Focus on understanding process • REAL WORLD IMPACTS AND OUTCOMES • Focus on outcomes

  3. “Tabled” • Name change? • Not now, possible to revisit, reasons to add “quality” in title but reasons to keep “follow up and treatment” • Beyond NBS • Focus remains on some critical NBS questions, possible to revisit

  4. Overview • Lessons from the past to inform the future • Framing questions of interest and identifying sources of data (and gaps) • Coordination across existing projects and programs • Projects of intrinsic value selected and designed to be help/model for other conditions • Focus on issues with opportunity to add value to ongoing and newly developing programs • Next steps – after input from full Committee, workgroups are poised to start fleshing out projects

  5. Screening Program Implementation – Possible Case Studies/Projects Short and LTFU and treatment - what are/should be the metrics?* what are the costs? what is the impact on families?* Explore current and possible models. • Ongoing evaluation of critical congenital heart disease (CCHG) implementation • Hearing screening follow-up • Connecting point-of-care testing with DBS screening (perhaps using HIT) *examples – impact of FP, specific metrics focused on process and on outcomes, e.g. developmental outcomes in CCHD)

  6. Closing Gaps in Systems of Care - Possible Case Studies/Projects • Roles and responsibilities in LTFU • As part of case studies, include focus on learning what are the current (and variable) roles and responsibilities in LTFU for children with hearing impairment and sickle cell (disease or carrier). • Consider a focused case study of NBS results in the EMR and the EMR as a source of LTFU data • Challenges and opportunities in the changing health care environment • Request presentation (after SCOTUS decision) on impact of changes in care systems on children with heritable disorders

  7. Real World Impacts and Outcomes - Possible Case Studies/Projects • Explore the extent to which we can document improved clinical outcomes; whether we are realizing the potential of NBS. • Sickle cell as a “test case”: gaps between technology and disease mgt.; variability in SC trait notification and FU conditions; long history, rich data sources; multiple issues that are important for other conditions • Coordinate with ongoing work including HHS initiative • Focus on developing key questions questions and on understanding data sources to identify gaps • Consider options for overarching approaches and/or other case studies or comparisons that might provide guidance to FU for those in the panel or for those to come in the future

More Related