100 likes | 235 Views
Ethics. The challenges of state and non-state proliferation. Source: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. http://www.ctbto.org/specials/1945-1998-by-isao-hashimoto / (12 minutes onwards). State Proliferation. Q: Which states are ‘trusted’ to have nuclear weapons?
E N D
Ethics The challenges of state and non-state proliferation
http://www.ctbto.org/specials/1945-1998-by-isao-hashimoto/ • (12 minutes onwards)
State Proliferation • Q: Which states are ‘trusted’ to have nuclear weapons? • Q: What happens to other states who acquire nuclear weapons? • Q: Why have them if no one will ever use them? • Q: What situations would a state use nuclear weapons?
Non-State Proliferation • Never happened. • The biggest threat (a while ago) was from Nukes in the former USSR that were unsecured after the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe. • Now… terrorism? North Korea / Iran / Pakistan supplying non-State actors.
Short Answers… • Outline two perspectives on the ethical issue of nuclear armament. (6-7 marks)
Evaluation of statements The threat posed to global security from the proliferation of conventional weapons is far more real than that posed by WMDs falling into the hands of would-be terrorists.
Evaluation of statements Non-state proliferation has presented new, harder problems to the global community in the fields of arms control and disarmament.
Evaluation of statements International politics, like all politics, is a struggle for power. “Whatever the ultimate aims of international politics, power is always the immediate aim”. (Hans Morgenthau) As a result arms control and disarmament will never succeed because they seek to curtail state power.