1 / 10

Issues Resolved Since PSR

Issues Resolved Since PSR. Lester Farwell OMPS Chief Engineer. Issues Since OMPS PSR. Performance Issues (Compliance, etc) MIL-STD-1540C PFM Compliance: CLOSED Details for OMPS identified in SER (Systems Engineering Report) IN0092TST-074 Residual risk: NONE – PFM testing compliant

lloyd
Download Presentation

Issues Resolved Since PSR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Issues Resolved Since PSR Lester Farwell OMPS Chief Engineer

  2. Issues Since OMPS PSR Performance Issues (Compliance, etc) • MIL-STD-1540C PFM Compliance: CLOSED • Details for OMPS identified in SER (Systems Engineering Report) IN0092TST-074 • Residual risk: NONE – PFM testing compliant • ISS Cable Vibe: CLOSED • Questions regarding RV of flight cables with unit level testing • Residual risk: LOW (RFS=2) – Analysis coupled with SC level testing • 40 Safety Related Items: CLOSED • TIM provided clarifications: acceptable to all • SAR updated and submitted for approval • Residual risk: NONE – SAR complete • FSW Change from 3.4 to 3.5: CLOSED • V 3.4 Updates for EEPROM Refresh Capability • EDCM_Inhibit_Enabled changed for TLM • V 3.5 Resets EDCM bit to V 3.3 state • Residual risk: NONE – No impact to mission Significant Hardware Issues • EEPROM Reset Line and Function: OPEN • SBC EEPROMs (two) share common reset line: on-orbit operational concerns for memory volatility • Residual risk: Low (RFS=3) – Redundancy available / Refresh capability • GD SBC Solder Stress: OPEN • Component lead solder stress cracks on similar boards and part types as SBC • Questions on thermal stress analysis approaches and resulting outcome • Residual risk: LOW (RFS=2) – FS >2 (300 cycles) • Activated Flux Cored Solder: CLOSED • BATC MAB: incorrect solder used for processing hardware • Residual risk: NONE – No impact to OMPS • S-lead Component: CLOSED • Questions regarding use of low temperature solder on electrical parts • Determined acceptable • Residual risk: LOW (RFS=2) – Redundancy available

  3. EEPROM Reset Line and Function: OPEN Problem Statement • SBC EEPROMs (two) share common reset line • Drain resistor 4.75 KOhms • Worst case (EV) reset voltage > Spec 0.8 V DPSR Risk Assessment • Current risk assessment: Moderate (RF=3) • Likelihood (Probability): • Remote: L = 1 (<10% chance) • Impact (Technically): • Moderate: I = 3 (degraded sys performance • Same part on-orbit: CALIPSO 2 years – NO Resets or problems • SBC redundancy available • EEPROM refresh capability Potential OMPS Impacts • Potential for on-orbit malfunctions during mode transitions of EEPROM reset voltages • Possible corruption of EEPROM memory • Could impact two simultaneously DPSR Status • Part characteristics critical: assessing • Plan to UAI Status: OPEN OMPS UAI Resolution Methodology • Investigate input leakage current • Present EOL value is 100 uA: Realistic?? • Estimates range from 2x smaller to 10x smaller in value • EOL calculations for WCA reset voltage dependent upon leakage value

  4. GD SBC Solder Stress: OPEN Problem Statement • BATC FRB responding to GD alert for component stress from thermal cycling • Impacts two part types (inductor & IC – 1553 chip) • Component stress cracks on PWAs other than SBC • Same production line • Same part types and application process DPSR Risk Assessment • Current risk assessment: LOW (RF=2) • Likelihood (Probability): • Remote: L = 1 (<10% chance) • Impact (Technically): • Low: I = 2 (minimal sys degradation) Potential OMPS Impacts • Cause GD SBC incapable of proper operation, causing mission compromise DPSR Status • Results not expected to change: FS > 2 Resolution Methodology • GD performed additional accelerated thermal cycles to 300 over the range 140 oC DT • Stress marks developed after 24 thermal cycles • Stress cracks occurred after 93 thermal cycles • Stress cracks continued to degrade after 300 thermal cycles • No electrical failures were seen at 300 cycles. • BATC analysis for OMPS test and flight environments • Fatigue factor 4x in calculation • FS > 2 for OMPS expected application life • Additional analysis (BATC/GSFC) in progress: ~ 2 wks • Results not expected to change Status: OPEN OMPS SBC expected to be compliant

  5. None Activated Flux Cored Solder: CLOSED Problem Statement • Solid flux-cored solder with activated rosin flux use for flight hardware within BATC • BATC Mission Assurance Bulletin MAB-2008-006 issued: • Notify assembly technicians of discrepant solder issue • Provide programs with a consistent approach to assess risk for affected hardware • Direct programs to review all solder spools for compliance and to identify all affected hardware DPSR Risk Assessment • Early cable risk factor assessment determined:3 (Likelihood = 1; Impact = 3-4) • Risk to TSP (TLM & signal) and co-axial cable lines (FPA clocks) • Current risk assessment: (after accelerated life test) NONE Potential OMPS Impacts • FPA’s – no impacts: cleaning and early fabrication • PWA’s – no impacts: cleaning and NVM measurements • Cables – Possible impacts: risk is possible corrosion at the solder locations of cable shield terminations only DPSR Status • NO cable degradation, corrosion, etc. Status: Closed No OMPS Impacts Resolution Methodology • Hardware testing – DOE by BATC MA & M&P • Testing completed for 10 year ground • NO corrosion, damage, or contamination • Root cause – determined • Discrepant solder removed from company • Corrective action for OMPS – None

  6. S-lead Component Resolution: CLOSED Problem Statement • Micro circuit (UC1717) failed during MEB integration • Parts (8) are used on each Motor Driver Board for Cal Mech ops • Failed after PWA thermal cycling: +90 oC to -50 oC DPSR Risk Assessment • Current risk assessment: LOW (RF=2) • Likelihood (Probability): • Remote: L = 1 (<10% chance) • Impact (Technically): • Low: I = 2 (minimal sys degradation) Potential OMPS Impacts • Inability for Nadir and Limb to perform proper on-orbit calibration operations, compromising OMPS mission data DPSR Status • NO SPFs are mission limiting • NO Failures are propagating Status: Closed Minimal OMPS Impact Resolution Methodology • DPA of part indicated part was good internally • Fishbone diagram pointed to lead solder to part body • LCC using low temp solder • Soldered to PWB with low temp solder; then, reflowed • Part replaced; PWA, MEB, etc tested successfully • Functional (>1310 hrs – Pri, 600 hrs – Red, Failure free) • Environmental: RV, TVac, EMI • Reviewed solder application & process validation • Reliability analysis for part, functions, FMECA, SPF

  7. None MIL-STD-1540C PFM Compliance: CLOSED Problem Statement • Determination of MIL-STD-1540C time & temp correctly • Determine final time vs hot dwell time against 200 hour measure • Determine complete PFM testing vs MIL-STD-1540C “Protoqualification” testing DPSR Risk Assessment • Current risk assessment: NONE Potential OMPS Impacts • Flight hardware not fully tested in environments • Insufficient environmental testing • PFM hardware lacks full environmental “qualification” DPSR Status • PFM testing compliant with tailored MIL-STD-1540C protoqualification requirements Status: Closed OMPS Compliant Resolution Methodology • Provide PFM test matrix vs MIL-STD-1540C “Protoqualification” testing • TIMs with NGST to assess final status of testing and completeness of documentation

  8. ISS Cable Vibe: CLOSED Problem Statement • Questions regarding RV of flight cables with unit level testing DPSR Risk Assessment • Current risk assessment: LOW (RF=2) • Likelihood (Probability): • Remote: L = 1 (<10% chance) • Impact (Technically): • Low: I = 2 (minimal sys degradation) Potential OMPS Impacts • Flight hardware not fully tested in environments • Insufficient environmental testing • PFM hardware lacks full environmental “qualification” DPSR Status • LOW risk for testing of cables at NPP SC level Status: Closed OMPS Fully Compliant Resolution Methodology • Analysis to indicate relative loading vs connector interface location • Analysis indicates negligible impact to hardware performance; hence, mission success • Validation of impact demonstrated at NPP SC RV & acoustic testing

  9. None 40 Safety Related Items: CLOSED Problem Statement • NASA/GSFC and IPO Safety Engineering provided various comments for closure to the OMPS SAR (Safety Analysis Report) DPSR Risk Assessment • Current risk assessment: NONE Potential OMPS Impacts • Delay OMPS shipment for non-approval of SAR DPSR Status • All comments addressed and closed Status: Closed OMPS Fully Compliant Resolution Methodology • Resolved all open items from GSFC Comments of NP-EMD.08.K121.098 • TIM held with NASA/IPO/NGST/BATC to address all final comments and closures

  10. None FSW Change from 3.4 to 3.5: CLOSED Problem Statement • Limb straylight test (after PQ completion) performed • Full frame, single image contained LF pattern noise; not seen previously • FPA dark current not changed significantly DPSR Risk Assessment • Current risk assessment: NONE Potential OMPS Impacts • NONE to science • Additional 80 Hz noise negligible • Most images: EV with binning and co-addition • Problematic when viewing full frame images: 1 orbit/week DPSR Status • NO performance impacts: full ISS calibrated performance restored Status: Closed OMPS Fully Compliant Resolution Methodology • Performed investigation under flag for ISS configuration • Analysis & test configurations pointed to EDCM_INHIBIT_DISABLE bit as culprit • Change “0” to “1” for TLM dropouts (SW 3.3 – 3.4) • OMPS ERB decision to revert to “0” (SE 3.4 – 3.5)

More Related