110 likes | 233 Views
The HEAP-MM proposal. P. Piattelli. The call. INFRA-2011-1.1.23. Research Infrastructures for astroparticle physics : High energy cosmic rays , multi-messenger approach A project under this topic must :
E N D
The HEAP-MM proposal P. Piattelli P. Piattelli
The call • INFRA-2011-1.1.23. ResearchInfrastructuresforastroparticlephysics: High energycosmicrays, multi-messengerapproach • A project under thistopicmust: • provide and facilitate accessto the key researchinfrastructures in Europeformulti-messengerastronomy and astroparticlephysics • aimto integrate thesefacilities and resourceswith a long termperspective • stimulatenewscientificactivitiesaimed at taking full advantageof the possibilitiesofferedby the High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS), the Pierre AugerObservatory, the Major AtmosphericGamma-rayImagingCherenkovTelescope (MAGIC) and the newpossibilitieswhichwillbeofferedby the future CherenkovTelescopeArray (CTA) and KilometreCube Neutrino Telescope (KM3NeT) P. Piattelli
The HEAP-MM proposal • Keyword: “multimessengerapproach” • High energyprobes: chargedcosmicrays, gamma, neutrinos • Whatwe wanted toaddress • Astrophysics • Fundamentalphysics • New technologiesfor future infrastructures P. Piattelli
Aimof the proposal • Integrating the infrastructures • Science coordination • Toolsfor data analysis and data distribution • Interpretationofresults • Providingaccessto the existinginfrastructures • Accestoobservationtime • Access to data • Access to test experiments • Exploringnoveltechnologies • Improveexistinginfrastructures • Design newones P. Piattelli
Whowas in • 31 participantsfrom 14 EU countries • Existinginfrastructures • HESS • MAGIC • ANTARES • IceCube • Pierre AugerObservatory • Future infrastructures • CTA • KM3NeT • Enhancementsof the Pierre AugerObservatory P. Piattelli
Project organization P. Piattelli
Project organization P. Piattelli
Titolo P. Piattelli
Didwefailcompletely? • Proposalunsuccessfullfrom the pointofviewof the funding • Notfrom the pointofviewofstarting a discussiontoshape and bringtogether a verylarge community and toenlarge the user community “Already the work towardsthisproposalhadsignificant impact, in termsofall major facilitiesfor the very first timecommittingto open accesstotheir data” P. Piattelli
Someideasfor the discussion (randomthoughts) • Whocouldbe the users (besides the collaborations)? • Usersrequestingobservationtime (ratherclear in the case ofgamma-rayobservatories; whatcouldtheybe in the case of neutrino or cosmicrayobservatories? • Userrequestingaccessto the infrastructure • Toinstall test esperiments(test ofnewtechnologies, industrial partners, …) • Other science experiments(already under way and welldefined in the case of KM3NeT) • Access to the data (what policy and modelfor data distribution?) • How do wepublicize the accessopportunities? • Callsforobservationtime • Callsforaccessto the infrastructures • Web sitesfor open data access P. Piattelli
Global observatories • Share common practice • Share data requires common “format” • Source catalogs and open data repositories • Simulationtools P. Piattelli