1 / 16

What’s new

This presentation discusses the ohmic dissipation on the power coupler line of a 5.4.3.2.1 cavity, focusing on the new thermal shielding configuration. It details the propagation of reflection coefficient, attenuation factors, and power loss per unit length, along with considerations for connectors and cables. The presentation also covers radiation pressure and practical steps moving forward.

loisf
Download Presentation

What’s new

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What’s new Alessandro D’Elia

  2. Ohmic dissipation on the Power Coupler Line OLD 5 4 3 2 1 cavity 2000 6 131 10 63 We add more: N connectors, cables…. (see next slide) The line had been divided in 5 pieces. The dimensions are in mm We will propagate the reflection coefficient  along the line Top of the cryostat 5 4 3 2 1 x 0 L5 L4 L3 L2 L1

  3. Ohmic dissipation on the Power Coupler Line Top of the cryostat NEW Thermal shield  1000 Probably not yet the final configuration but very close to the final one 10 Thermal shielding  25 9  50 8 cavity  25 7 N connectors 6  900  50 5 coupler 10 4 3 2 1 Thermal shield x 0 L4 L3 L2 L1 L10

  4. Transmission Line Input parameters Let us assume Q0=6.6x108, =130 (previous, 200) and a resonant frequency of 101.28MHz

  5. As usual Propagation of the Reflection Coefficient Voltage and Current in the line With Propagation coefficient Propagation constant Attenuation Factor Attenuation Factor of the dielectrics This is evaluated for coax having inner and outer conductors of the same material Attenuation Factor of the conductors

  6. The perturbation method This is a standard and useful technique (e.g. R. E. Collin, ‘Foundations for Microwave Engineering’, p. 77) which avoids using L, C, R and G parameters and instead uses the fields of the lossless line with the assumption that they are not much different from lossless line fields Power loss per unit length

  7. New alfa The fields of a TEM mode propagating trough the coax in cylindrical coordinates are the following: With the surface S defined as (ab) and (0  2)

  8. Dissipated power in the “old” line Old: surface resistance calculated by considering only stainless steel conductivity New: surface resistance calculated by considering different conductivity for inner and outer conductors

  9. Results new line

  10. Some consideration Dissipation has an exponential behavior depending on  (in figure  is small and we are still in the linear part). Therefore in principle it doesn’t matter where N connectors are. In practice is always better to put them in current node positions in case of losses due to bad contacts

  11. Comments • Total power dissipation is compatible with the one in TRIUMF • Final values for each part of the line may change after thermal analysis • We know values of the dissipation factor of the cables and connectors only at room temperature • Possible cryogenic tests of cables and N connectors (in Liquid Nitrogen) to measure the behaviour of the attenuation at low temperatures... If really needed

  12. Radiation Pressure • We don’t care about microphonic excitation as we work in CW • We don’t care about Lorentz detuning as the symmetry of our structure and the thickness of the copper layer exhibit a quite safety margin • We care about additional forces on tuner plate (more expensive moving engine to buy!!)

  13. Radiation Pressure The general formula (Franceschetti, “Campi elettromagnetici”) for evaluating the radiation pressure is (1) Where it is e the electric field, h the magnetic field and in the unit vector orthogonal to the surface. The quantity W is the local energy density In case of oscillating fields the value to take into account is the effective value which means that we have to multiply for a factor 1/2 In case of perfect conducting media we have on a planar surface only the component of e normal to the surface and tangential of h. The small surfaces defined in a meshing are always planar so that the equation (1) gets

  14. Radiation pressure on the tuning plate P. Sekalski, S. Simrock, L. Lilje, C. Albrecht, “Lorentz force detuning compensation system for accelerating field gradients up to 35 MV/m for superconducting XFEL and TESLA nine-cell cavities” CARE-conf-04-001-SRF E-Field H-Field

  15. Results Total Force=-1.77N Total Strength=180g Min=-140 N/m2 It seems we are safe

  16. CLIC • Walter Wuensch would like to have from me as soon as possible (less then 1 month) a document containing what we intend to realize by pointing out the first practical steps. • He also agrees on the possibility of having someone (namely Vasim...) here at CERN for a while in order to make easier the exchange of information, but this is a future step at the moment. • I’ve spoken with Vasim on Tuesday asking for some info and especially for any kind of material in order to have a more detailed overview of the structure • I discussed also with Riccardo Zennaro and he would like to have the matrix of circuit model and also all the possible HFSS or whatever files of the structure

More Related