330 likes | 341 Views
This presentation explores the importance of basic research in promoting breakthrough innovations and enhancing Europe's innovation capacity. It discusses the challenges faced by Europe in the field of basic research and highlights the key initiatives taken by the European Union to promote innovation. The presentation also emphasizes the need for integrating the social sciences and humanities in research and innovation strategies.
E N D
Wilhelm Krull The Innovative Potential of Basic Research Presentation for the Coimbra Group High-Level Seminar on Research Policy: “New Opportunities for University Cooperation” Venice, 27 October 2016 1
I. European Research in a Globalised World • Since the 1990ies, Europe has been loosing ground in the field of basic breakthroughs. • Still, Nobel prizes and similarly prestigious awards are won mainly by scientists working in the US. • Before the establishment of the ERC in 2007, Europe suffered from an almost total lack of transnational support for basic and strategic research. • Research is still not supported sufficiently in Europe, particularly with respect to risky, open-ended basic research. • How can we enable more breakthroughs, and thus reinforce the • innovation capacity of the EU? • What is the specific role of the social sciences and the humanities in EU RRI strategies? 2
The European Innovation Union • One of the seven flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020 strategy for a smart, sustainable, and inclusive economy. • Contains over thirty action points, with the aim to: • - turn Europe into a world-class science performer; • - remove obstacles to innovation; • - revolutionize the way public and private sectors work together. • Horizon 2020: the financial instrument implementing the Innovation Union. Running from 2014 to 2020 with an € 80 billion budget. 3
The Innovation Union – Key Initiatives • Promoting excellence in education and skills development • Delivering the European Research Area • Focusing EU funding instruments on Innovation Union priorities • Promoting the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) • Enhancing access to finance for innovative companies • Creating a single innovation market • Promoting openness and capitalizing on Europe’s creative potential • Spreading the benefits of innovation across the Union • Increasing social benefits • European Innovation Partnerships • Reforming research and innovation systems • Measuring Progress SocialSciences? Humanities? Basic Research? 4
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) The EIT is a bodyoftheEuropean Union established in March 2008. Budget:€ 2.4 billionforthe 2014 - 2020 period (EU budget). Headquarters: Budapest, Hungary (+ 17 co-locationcentresthroughout Europe). The EIT aims to facilitate the following transitions: from idea to product from lab to market from student to entrepreneur. Programme: Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KIC). …. andthe European Innovation Council? – 5
In the following I shall argue that … • If the EU aims at achieving an open society with the most dynamic, innovative, and adaptive capacities …basic research, including the social sciences and the humanities, needs to be systemically integrated in research and innovation strategies. • Preventive thinking, proactive consultation, and transparent processes of decision-making in research and innovation funding are prerequisites for achieving more breakthroughs. 6
II. Acting in a Multipolar, Increasingly Interdependent World 7 “Despite the fractures and conflicts of our age, societies are becoming more interconnected and interdependent. As a result, developments at the local level – whether economic, political or social – can acquire almost instantaneous global consequences, and vice versa. If we link to this the advances in science across many fields, often now instantly diffused through global communication networks, it is clear that the global arena has become both an extraordinary potential space for human development, as well as for disruption and destruction by individuals, groups or states.” (David Held: Global Challenges and Effectiveness, p. 217)
Innovation From Basic Research to New Products and Services • “The word innovation is one of the most overused, underdefined terms in organisational life. No one seems to be sure just what the word means.” • (Paul C. Light: Sustaining Innovation. Creating Nonprofit and Government Organisations that Innovate Naturally. San Francisco 1998, p. XIV.) 8
A linear process … “Insight must precede application.” … turnstoco-evolution ofresearchandinnovation. Photo: Wikimedia commons Max Planck (1859-1947) 9
IsthereAnythingRadically New, evenDisruptivein the Pipeline? The Economist, 12-18 January 2013
Basic Innovations (in Academia and Business) Need … • creativity • curiosity-driven research • freedom and time to mature • long-term perspectives • interactive communication • courage to venture risks • flexible methods • sensitivity for the unpredictable • serendipity Coimbra Group Position Paper: “Thereisno pre-ordained linear sequencefrombasicresearchtoinnovation andmarketableproducts!” 11
Living upto the Challenges of Transformative Research … 12 “Transformative research frequently does not fit comfortably within the scope of project-focused, innovative, step-by-step research or even major centres, nor does it tend to fare well whereever a review system is dominated by experts highly invested in current paradigms or during times of especially limited budgets that promote aversion of risks.” (National Science Board: Enhancing Support of Transformative Research at the National Science Foundation, May 2007, p. 4)
An Extraordinary Biography of Scientific and Economic Innovation 1990: “Independent Inventor” 1991: PostDoc at EMBL 1993: PostDoc in Finland 2002: Max Planck Director 2004: 4Pi Microscope (Leica Microsystems) 2006: Deutscher Zukunftspreis(President’sPrizefor Technology and Innovation) 2007: STED Microscope (Leica Microsystems) 2014: Nobel Prize Photo: Bernd Schuller, Wikimedia commons Stefan Hell 13
III. A Culture of Creativity Should Make a Difference • Creativity begins with … • Seeing things differently • Providing a stimulating environment • Encouraging risk-taking • Allowing for failures • Establishing high-trust relationships • It rests on the pillars of research-friendly governance structures and effective management. 14
The Seven C’s to Develop a Culture of Creativity • Competence • Courage • Commitment • Communication • Co-operation • Continuity • Centres/Clusters/Institutes. • Evaluation of the Danish National Research Foundation, Report, p. 13. 16
SuccessandFailure in the Labyrinth of Research Cabinet Office: R&D Assessment. A Guide for Customers and Managers of Research and Development. London 1989,12. 18
Fostering Individual Creativity by Providing Long-Term Perspectives • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (USA) • HHMI Investigators • MacArthur Foundation (USA) • MacArthur Fellows Program • Wallenberg Foundation (Sweden) • Wallenberg Academy Fellows • Wellcome Trust (Great Britain) • Investigator Awards • European Research Council (EU) • ERC Starting Grants • ERC Advanced Grants • Volkswagen Foundation (Germany) • Lichtenberg Professorship • “Freigeist” Fellowship 19
Tapping Potential for Transformative Research Ideas:Two Small Grants Initiatives “Original – isn't it?” New Options for the Humanities and Cultural Studies Experiment! – In Search of Bold Research Ideas 20
IV. The Role and Function of the Humanities Humanities ≠ Geisteswissenschaften ≠ Cultural Studies 21
Why Democracy Needs theHumanities “Thirsty for national profit, nations, and their systems of education, are heedlessly discarding skills that are needed to keep democracies alive. If this trend continues, nations all over the world will soon be producing generations of useful machines rather than complete citizens who can think for themselves, criticize traditions, and understand the significance of another person‘s sufferings and achievements. The future of the world‘s democracies hangs in the balance.” (Nussbaum, M., “Not for Profit. Why Democracy Needs the Humanities”, Princeton University Press, 2010. p. 2) 22
The Integrative CapacityoftheHumanities “How can the humanism take root if the very soil of humanistic thought is left to wither? What is tragically neglected in this era of Big Data is the remarkable integrative capabilities of the humanities. The integrative capability of the humanities has given rise to a number of hybrid and hyphenated disciplines. Prominent amongst them are the digital humanities; the medical humanities; legal humanities; ecological humanities; humanities and human rights; ‘imaging’ in the sciences and arts – to name but a few. Notice how such interdisciplinary formations display the extension of the humanities into areas of public policy, social action, ecological sustainability, and social ethics. Notice, too, how the ‘integrative’ impulse of the humanities is structured along the lines of inclusion and diversity, so that ‘public reason’ is accessible across social divisions, cultural differences, and geopolitical disjunctions. From this perspective, it becomes clear that the integrative humanities are preeminent in providing operational knowledge and ethical goods that contribute to the building of an international or global civil society.” (Homi K. Bhabha: Speech at Inauguration of UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova, Paris, November 18, 2013) 23
In Many European Universities the Humanities and Social Sciences Suffer from: • A mismatch between proclaimed objectives and available resources • Gross disparities between teacher : student ratios and expected outcomes • High teaching loads and administrative obligations vs. amounts expected in project-based funding. 24
A Way out? – Creating Stimulating Environments: Institutes of Advanced Study • Functional dimension: interdisciplinarity, stimulating new ideas, relief from administrative obligations • Personal dimension: freedom, networking, personal encounters, turning point of an individual research career • Institutional dimension: strategic cooperation, “brain gain”, counterpoint to regular university life, productive tensions. Photo: Wikimedia commons Abraham Flexner “The Usefulnessof Useless Knowledge” 25
V. Some Paradoxies and Tensions for Universities • Autonomy vs. Dependence • Core funding vs. Project-based funding • Creativity vs. Compliance • Quality vs. Quantity • Interdisciplinarity vs. Organisational structures • Reliability vs. Irreproducibility 26
Beyond European Borders: Widening the Research Perspective • “Europe and Global Challenges” (since 2009) • Integrating North-South and South-South research collaboration 27
Setting the Right Framework Conditions in a Mulitlevel Research System 28
Seven Levels of Achievement: • Well-trained early career researchers (doctoral students as well as postdocs). • Increasing the knowledge base, publications, etc. • Creation of new methods and techniques (e.g. new instruments). • Provision of social knowledge; enhancing public debate and providing advice to policy-makers. • Enhancing the society’s problem-solving capacity. • Developing adequate forms of collaboration, and new opportunities for networking. • Products, licenses, new companies (start-ups etc.), in particular in science and engineering. 31
Thank you very much for your attention! Dr. Wilhelm Krull Secretary General Phone: +49 (0)511 8381-215 Fax: +49 (0)511 8381-235 E-Mail: krull@volkswagenstiftung.de Internet: www.volkswagenstiftung.de 33